Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Any thoughts on a Silver R34 GTR?

Only reason I am not 100% keen is because I have already owned a silver GTS-T.

Sliver or White is a good choice, all the others

-Bayside Blue yuck not a fan of it.

-MNP in all 3 versions impossible to keep clean(been there done that will my R33 GTR)

-Black is the same hard to keep clean

-Millenium Jade, good luck getting that colour I do like it but, would be my pick just because its rare.

-Yellow is shit also (been there done that also my 350Z).

Thanks for all of the input. Ben, I am starting to think that you are right on the money. I have been wanting bayside blue but I am starting to think the colour is a bit full on for me. Don't want white though, I dunno, just not keen on it. They look good, but I just don't want to own a white car? haha

My favourite colour is actually that darker grey that came in the later models. These are the colour codes:

KR4 - Darker Grey - in later models

KV2 - Most common, like the R33 GTS-T silver (Mine in my sig)

WV2 - Lighter than KV2

Here are some pics from another thread:

KR4

sp_b_3_h.jpg

KV2

sp_b_2_h.jpg

WV2

sp_b_3_h.jpg

R34 GTRs are definitely getting rare - I am having trouble finding them these days. Auctions are just white ones, or crashed ones.

Tonights Efforts:

9328104692_835aa706e0_b.jpg
IMG_4892 by 89CAL, on Flickr

9325719047_8e37620bd1_b.jpg
IMG_4863 - Copy by 89CAL, on Flickr

I missed a spot in the second photo, looks pretty obvious now but maybe it was just to late when I was playing with photos lol

  • Like 1

pics came up well Cal, looking good.

regarding colours on 34 GTR's i'd say white is my favourite - take Scott's GTR for example. I also am a fan of the grey, Bayside Blue looks great with black wheels.

The yellow i don't mind either, definitely not my first second or third choice but i've seen yellow GTR's come up looking really nice

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cool to see you're on the forum man, think you've met my twin brother a few times (Brent).
    • Yeah everyone always seems to refer to them as S13 wheels however they came on R32 Skyline, A31 Cefiro, C33 Laurel etc., and also came polished diamond cut or painted depending on the model. Congrats on your GTS purchase! I'd personally leave it NA.
    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
×
×
  • Create New...