Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think I know a little about this car. If the plates are still on the same car that is. But there was a blue r34 in Adelaide with these plates in around 2003. It was stock engine and turbos making about 260awkw with an exhaust and power FC. So yeah I would really doubt the claims of it being a 2.7 built in Japan!

I heard back from the guy with the SIL80 last night. He's doing the KA24 with twin TD06 turbos now. Insane?!?!

sounds like it will be a weapon for sure... wonder if he will let me have a look at it when its done

What ECU do you run, Force? Or just a standard?

I'm still waiting for Dysonest to get his ass over here and help me decide on what I want.

But yeah, apparently the RB26 D'Jetro splices pretty simply into the KA24 system. Almost nearly just plugs right in.

Actually, I even modded one to run my mates r32 gts-t and it was still simple. Barely any cutting or soldering.

the mafia is deffinately the person for the job by the sounds of it

Keep it up, you can pretend that you are cool. But you really must fail at life. I'm glad constantly trying to be cool on a forum makes you feel a little bit better about it.

If I wasn't such a calm person, I would have ended up punching you in the face by now if I knew you or met you. But, instead I'll just feel sorry for you needing to make up for your shortfalls.

Good luck anyway. Your mouth will catch up with you, not all people are smart enough to control themselves like I can.

Edited by The Mafia

I think I know a little about this car. If the plates are still on the same car that is. But there was a blue r34 in Adelaide with these plates in around 2003. It was stock engine and turbos making about 260awkw with an exhaust and power FC. So yeah I would really doubt the claims of it being a 2.7 built in Japan!

Reminds me of a mackay guy that said his RB20 was a forged 2.4 stroker. Sold it as that too. Engine died and my mate obtained it for parts. Was a 100% stock RB20. NOt a single bolt touched on the engine. Probably not even for servicing.

What ECU do you run, Force? Or just a standard?

I'm still waiting for Dysonest to get his ass over here and help me decide on what I want.

But yeah, apparently the RB26 D'Jetro splices pretty simply into the KA24 system. Almost nearly just plugs right in.

Powerfc mate L-Jetro, Will be getting removed and swapped for a Haltech Platinum Pro plugin at end of year. Needs the nismo AFM's if I wanna push the turbo's to their "potential" without issue..... or I swap to ecu with MAP sensor.... :)

Depends on who you want to tune it mate and what your needs are really..

Yeah, I've heard that too! LOL

Trained for 10 years. I think that's enough for me.

But you're just a smart mouthed dickhead that has read a few forums. I bet youve done f**k all actual modding. If any at all.

I don't know what you're trying to prove either, you keep coming back here. Must have a boring life.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...