Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just bought a new autometer Air/Fuel Ratio gauge and installed it into my rb20det bmw. The gauge shows that i'm running stoich when the car is warm, but it's about 2 led's away from running lean.. Should my car be running in the middle of stoich (12 o'clock)?? When i rev the car, it seems to stay around that same area, it never really enters the lean section, or rich section (though the car has only been running with this new engine for a week, drove it for the first time last night)..

I'm scared even though it's showing stoich, that it's a bit to close to the lean area.

any help appreciated, thanks.

post-30449-1161668499.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140135-what-afratio-is-safe-to-run/
Share on other sites

Your still only using a narrowband oxygen sensor so you will only ever be able to tell if its running lean or rich, not the actual AFRs. I think you'll find it will run around stoich < 3000 rpm because its using the oxygen sensor to stay at stoich (closed loop). If you give it some revs it should drop into the rich section since your running open loop and the stock ECU is very rich. If not your O2 sensor may be screwed.

The standard slow and narrow lambda sensor only sees A/F ratios around stoich. It is too slow and too narrow to record A/F ratios outside that area.

Well buying a useless gauge was a waste of money, wasn't it?

;) cheers :D

you should see the guage bouncing back and forth from rich to lean when in closed loop mode as its aiming to acheive an average afr of 14.7:1.

when you are under high load or wot, it should go into the rich zone and when the de-accelerate it should go lean or off altogether as the injectors are cut off.

the afr gauges are pretty useless, for reasons suggested above.

The stock o2 sensor is pretty useless, the stock ecu uses it when cruising to gradurally lean out the mixture safely, but it's too slow to rely on the readings when doing anything else other than cruising!

If you had a wideband o2........

As far as turbo's go, most tuners aim for 12:1 or 12.5:1, N/a cars can be tuned leaner than that 13:1 - 15:1

i don't recommend tuning it yourself unless you have the equipment and you know what you're doing!!

a turbo car running 14.7:1 on boost is bad news! it is too lean (hot) and you will burn out valves...

the afr gauges are pretty useless, for reasons suggested above.

The stock o2 sensor is pretty useless, the stock ecu uses it when cruising to gradurally lean out the mixture safely, but it's too slow to rely on the readings when doing anything else other than cruising!

If you had a wideband o2........

As far as turbo's go, most tuners aim for 12:1 or 12.5:1, N/a cars can be tuned leaner than that 13:1 - 15:1

i don't recommend tuning it yourself unless you have the equipment and you know what you're doing!!

a turbo car running 14.7:1 on boost is bad news! it is too lean (hot) and you will burn out valves...

Some WRX's hold closed loop until around 8Psi of boost from the factory. And alot of modern cars are now coming out with wideband 02 sensor factory.

The standard slow and narrow lambda sensor only sees A/F ratios around stoich. It is too slow and too narrow to record A/F ratios outside that area.

Well buying a useless gauge was a waste of money, wasn't it?

:( cheers ;)

i find it hard to believe that autometer marks these gauges as "not for use with wideband oxygen sensors" and sells them knowing that they aren't useful. If the 02 sensors output voltage drops to 0 volts, i would see that it's running lean, right? so it would be doing its job in that sense...

They aren't anywhere as accurate as their display would suggest, they should just have three led's rich' lean and stioch, but then they wouldn't sell very many. Neither would they if they made it a proper kit with a wide band sensor and sold it for $800

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dang. I love the little 'oil used' bingo card on the side.   🤣  Well, now they can use a box and an oil-filled goon.
    • Many many moons ago, I was chatting with Andy Wyatt, about his auto ignition tuning. One of the HUGE things he said to me, when tuning for power, right where you hit peak ignition timing for your max torque, dramatically increases NOx emissions. He was finding in testing, particularly on engines you could advance timing beyond peak torque, that backing the ignition timing off a couple of degrees only made for a small drop in torque (compared to if you keep backing it off further the same amount of degrees) but dramatically reduced NOx emissions. I'd say targetting for 14.7, and he's even mentioned in some scenarios going slightly leaner, and pulling a few degrees of IGN timing will help pass for emissions quite a lot. However, who tunes an RB for emissions
    • The main stuff from.Vibrant I see is more their intercooler piping, and everyone raving about their clamps, but when I looked it was about $150 per clamp... I was a bit   I also thought the public price SP had up was high. As Mark said, a normal exhaust shop can fab them. It was many years ago that I had a full exhaust built, but for a full turbo back exhaust, and 2 custom built mufflers, plus a high flow cat, was about $1,100, and that was fully installed, drive in, drive out. I believe SP was about $900 for 2 mufflers, just supplied   These days, I just buy the material and built it myself, because I need to stretch my $$$
    • I'm pretty sure if it's considered a gasoline powered vehicle you have to do certification against a fixed, very expensive certification fuel.  If you add two precats and then replace the main cat with two cats back to back you can get an RB26 to do 0.24 g/mi HC, 1.6 g/mi CO, and 0.3 g/mi NOx on the FTP-75 drive cycle. Found this out courtesy of California's laws at great expense. Divide by 1.61 to get g/km. So even with extra cats + precats you're blowing past the NOx limit by probably 2.3x. Probably the only way to get an RB25 or RB26 to meet euro 4 purely from an emissions per km standpoint and not durability/OBD2 requirements is retrofit at least intake side VVT, clearance the pistons to allow the full 50 degrees of advance so part throttle EGR can be maximized, and change the wastegate control from conventional 7 psi spring for example to one that is always fully open if the wastegate line is at 1 atm or higher and only close it in response to vacuum. See BMW's N54 engine as a reference for how this works. You would need to find space for a vacuum tank to function as an accumulator in this system. That way you can avoid any heat loss to the turbine as much as possible during cold start to heat the catalyst faster. Then find some way to eliminate as much as possible cold start enrichment to light off the catalyst rapidly. Maybe secondary air injection if there's no way to avoid cold start enrichment. Close coupled catalysts in the downpipe are probably necessary. I would also probably swap to EV14s, pick something with the correct spray targeting + dual cone pattern for the intake manifold you're using. EV1 style injectors to pass anything resembling modern emissions requires a very annoying air assisted injector system to break up the droplets at part throttle/idle which still doesn't work that great compared to just having smaller droplets from the injector to begin with. Realistically, you're probably going to be financially ahead if you just pay the fines instead. Or don't drive it into the city center. There's a reason why Nissan never bothered to even attempt certifying an RB for CA/US emissions. The VG30 needed external EGR on top of NVCS to pass in the 90s. Doing all of this work is also distinctly expensive and you're going to struggle to find anyone who is remotely interested in helping. 
    • I remember those, people use to steal them to make bongs.....
×
×
  • Create New...