Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

"i dont wanna have to make it a Nissan Highline just to get it past the pits tho."

you dont want to but if u want to pass u mite have too.. part and parcel of owning a hpi. do wat you gotta do, hell return it to dead stock if u have too den go to welshpool or o'connor/myaree and pass first time. saves u grief.

like dey say do it once do it right.

here's another thing. suck up. do wat dey say dont argue and for ffs dont b cocky and think ur all dat. dey deal with this shit everyday, and to them ur another one.

just my 2c. (yes, i frequent the pits a hell of alot)

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i dont get it? how does having faded/silver windscreen wipers make your vehicle unroadworthy? thats the biggest load of shit ever :S

Its called ADRs, wipers etc should be non reflective - you cant beat adrs, unless you get an engineers report.

100mm is legal, I actually passed my car over welshpool pits slightly lower than 100mm (ie, it scraped when it went over) but the guy there thought it was close enough and let it slide

I also passed welshpool with coilovers - I really dont trust outstation pits, unless its pretty much stock, they dont like passing anything.

We have had to change the same bushes on a car 3 times. Then after telling us what a POS it is, he could only find 1 door handle you had to fiddle with to get open. If they don't want to pass you, they will find something.

Pit day 2 = ARGH!

Failed. again. Nothng mentiond about the previous problems. Now my front indicators are 2 far in, and not high enough. So looks like im in shopping for a new front body kit :)

Did you go to welshpool? Those reasons are BS. What bodykit do you have?

Aye i went to Welshpool. A 32 was in front of me.. got a little asian guy inspector, passed him after like a 5 min expection. I was like pleeeeeeaseeee give me him, he probaly owned the GTR i saw in the parking lot :) Then i saw the inspector from kelmscott come out and im like ohhhh shit! I had my friends mum take my car thru, and lucky he went to some other guy instead of to me... then the asian inspector waved my friends mum to come forward so i watched from the seats at the side. Went around all the outside of the car and checked all the lights horn etc. He stopped at the front of the car and looked at my indicators and is like to the guy that failed me the first time (the old kelmscott guy).. they look okay to you? and of course he said no. i was like GRRR so i ran over and asked what the problem was. He explained my lights were to far down and to far away from the outside of the car. He also said that if my headlight indicators were working it wouldnt matter. I then told him that R33 indicators are not apart of the headlights and they are below the lights on the body kit. He just said it dont meet standards, and failed my car ;)

So ive done a bit of looking around on SAU and ive found a number for a panel beater so im gonna go in tomorrow and get a quote.

post-32545-1162284792.jpg

here's pic sorry about quality.

A 32 was in front of me.. got a little asian guy inspector, passed him after like a 5 min expection.

heys, dat was me in the skyline (if it was a white one, and if your 33 had a black fmic). the 5 minute job was a re-inspection.

btw on a side note wat colour was the gtr in the car park? i didnt c one...

We got told off for having 8 1/2 inch rims on a Commodore (back in Trev days) but then if it was a "HSV" or "SS" it would have been ok but it wasn't. Doesn't matter that they are exactly the same under there.

Then had tail lights checked on a 31 "they were too dull" but then next inspection I said "checked by an auto sparky and said they were normal" and the inspector says "oh they are fine". Grrr....

Can see why people get annoyed.

indicators are to be within 400mm of the side of the car i think..

i have a very similar model bar to yours, and this is where mine are mounted.

(in the right/left hand vents, up the top)

ADR 13/00 INSTALLATION OF LIGHTING

front direction indicators

no more than 400mm inboard of vehicle outer edge

at least 600mm apart

between 350 & 1500mm above the ground

visible 45 deg inward & 45 deg outward

visible 15 deg upwards & 15 deg downwards

(dont look at my front bar lol)

We got told off for having 8 1/2 inch rims on a Commodore (back in Trev days) but then if it was a "HSV" or "SS" it would have been ok but it wasn't. Doesn't matter that they are exactly the same under there.

Then had tail lights checked on a 31 "they were too dull" but then next inspection I said "checked by an auto sparky and said they were normal" and the inspector says "oh they are fine". Grrr....

Can see why people get annoyed.

vehicles are not supposed to have any variation to running gear from what came from factory with out engineers report

does not matter if the cars are identical , if the factory did not fit it then they can knock it back

Ive never been over the pits, but some of the reasons they give are just total BS. Things that affect car safety, ok, but indicators too far in, what the f**k does that even mean from a car owners POV? isnt that where the manufacturer put them?

these aftermarket front bars are made for looks only

the reasons are BS but the line needs to be draw somewhere

there are enough bad drivers out there that dont need any help from poorly designed body kits making it harder to see the safty equipment (thats what these lights are) than they need be

IMO

vehicles are not supposed to have any variation to running gear from what came from factory with out engineers report

does not matter if the cars are identical , if the factory did not fit it then they can knock it back

not quite, new federal standards allow quite significant variation in wheels sizes and also allow for variation of track up to +25mm without engineer certification.

My 17x9x10 inch rims passed over welshpool on an S13, and yes they did measure the wheels, check track, and check tyre size - all legal.

there are lots of changes to federal stds going on all the time

the problem is that the state authorities dont always know there has been a change unless someone informs them

also the guys at licensing dont know all the adr's and vsb's that are being developed, if you are aware of some change but you still get knocked back, its probebly because they are unaware and you need to inform the top bloke there (John Dombrose) of any changes to the regulations.

also comes down to the individual checking the vehicle, and he can knock it back for any reason he wants

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...