Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all

I have a set of Advan Racing RG wheels on the car. The rear is running 265/50/R17 on it.

Now, the current Falken tyres are rat house, so I went looking at the tyre shops for new tyres (Just for prices atm) and I can't manage to get any.

Can anyone recommend somewhere in Sydney to buy them from (I'm even thinking of putting Semi slicks on it for track use)

I'm currently in wollongong.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/140353-gah-cant-find-tyres/
Share on other sites

Sam, can you explain why they are wrong?

I don't understand how a profile can be "wrong" or do you mean wrong for keeping the speedo accurate?

As so far, I've checked it against a mates car, with basically stock tyres, and both speedos read identical...

Will the drop in size be that dramatic on my speedo reading also?

i'm not sure why, but the wider you go the lower the profile. that's how it usually works.

i have 265/35/18's on the rear, they are impossible to find in 40 series. but my front 235/40/18 are easy to get.

maybe someone can shed some more light.

You have a R33 GTS-T. That would mean the stock tyre size is 205/55/16 right?

I have plugged in a few details into a calucator that is located here: http://www.1010tires.com/TireSizeCalculator.asp

Stock Tire - 205/55R16

Rim Width Range: 5.5 - 7.5 in

Overall Diameter: 24.87 in 631.69 mm

Actual Speed: 60 mph 100 km/h

Tire 1 - 265/50R17

Rim Width Range: Unrecognized tire size.

Overall Diameter: 27.43 in 696.72 mm

Speedometer1: 54.3 mph 90.6 km/h

Speedometer Difference: 10.30% too slow[/color][/size]

Tire 2 - 255/40R17

Rim Width Range:8.5 - 10 in

Overall Diameter: 25.03 in 635.76 mm

Speedometer1: 59.6 mph 99.3 km/h

Speedometer Difference: 0.637% too slow

Edited by Thunderbolt

And 255/40 R17 are piss easy to find. You can get soft street tyres, or a more touring tyre, and most of the more "street sports" oriented companies (Toyo, Falken, etc) have a range of tyres in that size.

Since it keeps your speedo so much more accurate, I'd suggest going there instead.

that's a handy tool.

says mine is:

Stock Tire - 205/65R16

Actual Speed: 60 mph - 100 km/h

Tire 1 - 265/35R18

Speedometer1: 62.8 mph - 104. km/h

Speedometer Difference: 4.699% too fast

Diameter Difference: - Diameter Difference: 4.5%

sounds about right. thanks for that link

And 255/40 R17 are piss easy to find. You can get soft street tyres, or a more touring tyre, and most of the more "street sports" oriented companies (Toyo, Falken, etc) have a range of tyres in that size.

Since it keeps your speedo so much more accurate, I'd suggest going there instead.

I will run 265 on mine as soon as it's time to replace them.

As for Falken having 255, not anymore, there largest tyre is now a 235. Don't ask me, I was only speaking to the reps.

Also, Falken = THE SHITTEST tyre ever. Absolutely, ZERO traction! Get them slightly warm, and they walk all over the road too!

Looks like you guys worked it out earlier in this thread.

265/50 is too big in diameter, the "50" is the profile of the tyre as a percentage of the width.

265/40 is much closer (very slightly larger) to stock diameter.

265/50's would look like tractor tyres?

Also, Falken = THE SHITTEST tyre ever. Absolutely, ZERO traction! Get them slightly warm, and they walk all over the road too!

That's true for the Ziex series, especially the 326's, but they do make some reasonable tyres.

The infamous RT215s stick like shit on carpet unless its wet and they're worn, the ST115s aren't bad as a more long-lasting street sports tyre, and I've heard that the FK451s are a good "touring" tyre.

I will run 265 on mine as soon as it's time to replace them.

As for Falken having 255, not anymore, there largest tyre is now a 235. Don't ask me, I was only speaking to the reps.

Also, Falken = THE SHITTEST tyre ever. Absolutely, ZERO traction! Get them slightly warm, and they walk all over the road too!

what are you talking about mate?? Falken make probably at least 15 different types of tyre suitable for a passenger car with a 17inch rim. so i'm assuming you've tried them all? and they are all shit? or are you just talking nonsense? Sorry if it sounds harsh but it's so tiring hear people sprout rubbish.

I've tried a mere 4 different types of falkens in 17s. 1 was terrible, 1 was excellent and 2 were quite good. so you could understand why I would think it strange you think all falken tyres are crap. I also highly doubt they only make 17inch tyres up to 235 wide.

Go down to a tyre shop, and ask to have a look at the new Falken range.

As for Falken tyres being shit.

I haven't ran various ones in 17", but I've driven many a car with Falkens fitted, and not a single one will grip at all.

As for the 265/50 looking like tractors... Nope, still quite a small profile really... It's weird. I'll check them again, but I swear it said 265/50/R17

Okay, just went and washed the car, and took a VERY close note on what size they are.

Sizes:-

Front: Falken ZIEX ZE326 235/40ZR17

Rear: Falken FK451 265/40ZR17

Don't ask me what the "Z" stands for.

So as for FK451 being a good touring tyre. THEY'RE UTTER SHIT on my car.

And you can't blame my alignment either. I got it aligned 2 weeks ago incase it was out. Which it was. Badly. Stupid previous owners!

Okay, just went and washed the car, and took a VERY close note on what size they are.

Sizes:-

Front: Falken ZIEX ZE326 235/40ZR17

Rear: Falken FK451 265/40ZR17

Don't ask me what the "Z" stands for.

So as for FK451 being a good touring tyre. THEY'RE UTTER SHIT on my car.

And you can't blame my alignment either. I got it aligned 2 weeks ago incase it was out. Which it was. Badly. Stupid previous owners!

I knew you didn't have 265/50's!

But anyway.

I still can't seem to track down 265 in Wollongong, anyone know a good tyre shop in Sydney (I'm NOT talking Tempe) I'm half tempted to go and buy a set of Semis to put on the RG tyres, and buying maybe some stockies for the front and rear with just average tyres on them, for wet weather/winter days.

why not just get some 255s? 10mm difference will mean SFA. plus due to variances in different manufacturers tyres it's quite possible some 255s will have as much tread as some 265s.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...