Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi.

I'm thinking of changing my GT3037R turbo to a GT3582BB .82A/R (Aka GT3540), I use 272in/264Exh cams, greddy intake++ and the rest of the engine is fully built. The GT3037R made 430Rwhp at 1.3 bar, that was with an SSauto exhaust manifold, now I have a 6boost manifold and a Turbosmart 45mm WG that will go on along with the GT35...

Anybody here that use the GT35 on a RB25? When will I see full boost?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/141734-gt3582bb-on-a-rb25det/
Share on other sites

I think I have read that tread..

I found this post by Hyper33:

1994 GTS-T S1

Power FC

Tomei Poncams (rest stock internals)

Sard 850cc Injectors

FMIC

Sard FPR

GT3540R .82 EXH on high mount

Turbosmart 48mm progate wastegate

Bosch 044

Z32 AFM

BP Ultimate fuel

full exhaust mods from turbo

Pod filter

15psi boost

410.7rwhp (306rwkw)

Do you have the Ft-pund/Nm figures from this pull?

post-21189-1162630484.jpg

Well its actually 13psi at peak power. Interesting indeed. Although the intake temps on the shootout sheet are a bit high at 48C.

No doubt the 0.82 housing with a GT35 turbine is very efficient too for the power level.

Can you tell us which exhaust housing your GT3037R has please , sounds like a HKS version and I'm curious to know the exhaust housings AR ratio and mount flange style ie T25 or T3 .

Also the 3037 was available in three compressor trims of which the 56T is common and the 52T not so common . The 48T version must be rare as . The highest spec version will be the 56T and HKS's exhaust housings went up to 1.12AR ratio . As I said recently I'm not sure if they still sell non gated exhaust housings in T3 flange but the T28 flanged ones are still available .

If your not using the larger/est housings available you won't get the most from a GT3037 . Some of the response problem with the GT3582R is the extra innertia to overcome from the larger diametre turbine but its needed to drive the larger diametre compressor . The only other available non hybridised off the shelf turbo from Garrett is the HKS specific GT3240 , this is a modified GT3582R , its had its turbine cropped and its compressor trim is 82mm GT40 in 54 trim vs the GT3582R's 56 trim . I've only ever seen them with a .87AR T25 flanged HKS exhaust housing , these will be an expensive option but is money is no object ....

Cheers A .

I made 315Rwkw (430rwhp) at 18PSI (on a Dynopack) with a GT3037R so 410Rwhp with a GT3540 shuld be right,

Depends how agressive you want the Tune

I made 502 rwhp on 18 psi and run 10.8 @ 129 mph

Ive got customers cars running around with Gt35/40`s making 430 rwhp all day everyday on pump fuel @ 18psi

Can you tell us which exhaust housing your GT3037R has please , sounds like a HKS version and I'm curious to know the exhaust housings AR ratio and mount flange style ie T25 or T3 .

Also the 3037 was available in three compressor trims of which the 56T is common and the 52T not so common . The 48T version must be rare as . The highest spec version will be the 56T and HKS's exhaust housings went up to 1.12AR ratio . As I said recently I'm not sure if they still sell non gated exhaust housings in T3 flange but the T28 flanged ones are still available .

If your not using the larger/est housings available you won't get the most from a GT3037 . Some of the response problem with the GT3582R is the extra innertia to overcome from the larger diametre turbine but its needed to drive the larger diametre compressor . The only other available non hybridised off the shelf turbo from Garrett is the HKS specific GT3240 , this is a modified GT3582R , its had its turbine cropped and its compressor trim is 82mm GT40 in 54 trim vs the GT3582R's 56 trim . I've only ever seen them with a .87AR T25 flanged HKS exhaust housing , these will be an expensive option but is money is no object ....

Cheers A .

I have the T3 0.96 it think (it is over .90), I bought it from Horsepowerinabox, it has a AR 60 compressor house and antisurge :laugh:

I dobbel checked my order from when I bought it and it was a .82 house that I have on my GT3037R :) "it is also calld GT3076R same turbo several part number references"

Edited by Quicksilver_Supra
I dobbel checked my order from when I bought it and it was a .82 house that I have on my GT3037R :) "it is also calld GT3076R same turbo several part number references"

Yes the GT3037 56T and Garretts GT3076R use the same cartridge/wheels so compressor must be 56 trim .

Turbo number should be 700382-12 and CHRA no 700177-0007 or -5007 .

In the first pic the tag was badly stamped "30037" - should read 3037 .

The second pics says 700382-11 because of different housing options used by HKS .

Cheers A .

post-9594-1162716311.jpg

post-9594-1162716446.jpg

Edited by discopotato03

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man that dinner was such a long time ago....2010! I would only replace the rubber coolant lines with silicone these days; cheap, readily available and will last for ever. You will need new hose clamps though eg https://justjap.com/products/cooling-pro-silicone-engine-heater-hose-set-black-nissan-r32-gtr-rb26dett
    • I wouldn't look too hard at what they did with the R32 GTR in endurance racing in Australia... Lots of things weren't actually available from the factory in the way those cars ran them... Japan also followed what Fred Gibson was doing here with some of there endurance cars in Japan... Australia is also the reason for things like the Brembo brakes, and the change in the gearbox... And quite a few other tricks they used to pull. There's a few other SAU peeps still on these forums that will have heard the stories direct from Alan Heaphy, Fred Gibson, and Jim Richards when we were lucky enough to have a great dinner with them
    • For all the talk of "these parts are junk" I generally recommend OEM because it's really not as bad as claimed. I have never seen or heard of a case like the N63 where the oil returns completely clog with coked oil for example in ~10 years or less. Would it be nice if it were a straighter path? I guess, but most modern cars use a scavenge pump instead of a pure gravity return. Also the factory lines that would be relatively simple to convert to braided are generally speaking hardlines from the factory. I would consider braided line to be a regression, not an improvement. It's also been engineered such that all the hardlines have appropriate strain relief where needed. There's absolutely room for improvement, for example the HKS advantage heritage intake piping shows just how much can be done to make the turbos fight each other less in OEM twin turbo configuration and reduce compressor surge but it's rarely a simple/straightforward process. I recommend looking at what the group A/N1 cars did, generally speaking the changes they made were necessary and proven in endurance racing.
    • Yes, multi relays needed, and possibly a diode. I'm not actually going to think about it though.
×
×
  • Create New...