Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Warpspeed - that's exactly what I was looking for ;)

I remember a person on another now defunct forum called lott004... who was a garrett engineer as well.. he was a bloody helpful and friendly bloke too... Is this the same person?

Cheers,

Matt

Yes, its the same guy. He has in the past been swamped by morons and people begging for compressor flow maps that Garrett will not make public. So he stays hidden these days. Don't blame him either. Hehehe.

Jezz,

I'm more of a circuit racer than a drag racer, and as such, I want as much response as possible.

I considered the 2530s, which are meant to be "the best turbos for street and track", but I can't understand how that can be when they come on 500rpm later than stock turbos.

The GTR is laggy enough as it is, in fact when I first test drove one, after owning two GTS-ts, I thought that the engine was busted. Seriously.

So the GT-SS are meant to come on earlier than the stock turbos, AND make more power (I've been told 320kw @ all four is possible, but I'm aiming for 300kw @ all four) which sounded perfect for my needs.

I'll let you know how they go when they get installed, which has been pushed back another month or so now that I'm waiting for forged rods to come from the US :)

Andrew... I think everyone has seen the Best Motoring Mines 34 video.

Would you call that spooling up late? It's perhaps a bit hard to tell as it spends all its time above 3,000 but I'd imagine it's the total package making for the response (ie. VX-Rom, cams etc.)

T.

Andrew... I think everyone has seen the Best Motoring Mines 34 video.

Would you call that spooling up late? It's perhaps a bit hard to tell as it spends all its time above 3,000 but I'd imagine it's the total package making for the response (ie. VX-Rom, cams etc.)

T.

Yes. everyone has seen it, and if you look closely, it never falls below 4000rpm, except for once or twice and when it pulls from 3000rpm, it's nothing like the pull it gives when exiting a 4000rpm corner...

In reality, stock GTRs hit decent boost at 4000rpm, and 2530s lift that to 4500rpm, and that's extra lag that I don't need.

2530s might be fine for trackwork, but they won't be as good as the GT-SS or standard turbos for street use, where you are mostly around 2000-4000rpm.

This is all theory btw, I'll let you know how these GT-SS go in about a month's time.

Perhaps 2530s are ultimate for the track, but they certainly aren't ULTIMATE for the street. There are better.

edit: Maybe Mines are able to lower the rpm when the 2530s kick in with their combination of parts and tuning, but unfortunately I don't have the money for a Mines crate engine :rofl:

Yes it's true that Garrett make HKS turbo chargers, but also a majority of sports compact racers in the USA use Garrett Turbochargers not HKS. On the Japanese HKS website it lists the different sizes of turbine wheels, these are the same sizes on the Garrett turbos. We purchase a range of turbos from a company called Precision Turbo and Engine and one of these is a GT37 we retail this turbo for $1850 now the closest comparison to this in the HKS range is a ball bearing one which on the HKS USA site retails for about $3880 US, (ball bearing and non ball bearing is whole other argument) and this only has a TO4E cover on it.

Andrew... I think everyone has seen the Best Motoring Mines 34 video.

Would you call that spooling up late? It's perhaps a bit hard to tell as it spends all its time above 3,000 but I'd imagine it's the total package making for the response (ie. VX-Rom, cams etc.)

T.

Yeh awesome footage, but it was also using +9,000rpm rev limit on a modded engine, id love to see that footage in a std weight R34 GTR with std engine and 2530s :headspin:

Fair to expect quite a difference in performance? :confused:

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Merli, we have just tuned another GTR with 2530's (an R33 this time), it makes more power EVERYWHERE than it did with the standard turbos. It makes more power off boost, as well as on boost, maxed at 310 rwkw. It makes 1 bar 250 rpm earlier than it did with the standard turbos. The only extra bits it has, other than turbos themselves, are the HKS split dumps and a tune.

I am not the only one, I suggest you have a look at MarkR34GTR's recent results with 2530's.

If there is a better combo (road and track) turbo than a pair of 2530's on a 2.6 litre GTR, I have yet to see it. Remember I am not a HKS fan, if there was something better I would use it. But I can't find them and I have been looking for 4 years. If anybody can produce a better all round dyno graph on an internally standard RB26DETT, then I'll be pleased to eat my words.

Hi all,

I've asked this elsewhere but I believe it may be more appropriate here as this eems to be the house of expertise...

I've seen lots of claims of "Garrett GT3040". Unless I am completely missing something, what is this turbo exactly? I certainly cant find an official reference to it by Garrett. GCG's web site say GT3040 and quote a part number GSB8005A. I have a Garrett SB8005A and I cant see where the '40 comes into it, it has a T04s compressor not a GT40 and is a GT30 series turbo. Are they making hybrids and adding the HKS naming for marketing reasons or have I missed something??

the hks 2530 versus a garret simmalar item has got so much more potential, more power, smoother flow and a simple jab of the right pedal can light up the rears nstantly.

garrett send hks the housing then hks start their own little process on shaving the insides, different internals and a wheel that only hks can get.

mines gtr, perfect example.

Hi Merli, you asked "if I am able to bring the turbos on 500rpm earlier than stock with my GT-SS turbos, would that be better for street than GT2530s in your opinion?"

Yes, if the GTSS's make more power than the standard turbos EVERYWHERE, then they are better than the standard turbos. But in order to be better than 2530's they have to make more power EVERYWHERE than the 2530's.

If the result is mixed, GTSS's better at low rpm and 2530's better at high rpm, then we can argue about which is better forever and not get a result. I would argue average power over the rpm range used is as good a method as any. So if you want to do a comparison then let's do it, here is my submission based on Mark's result, since it is published on this forum.

296 rwkw @ 7250 rpm

295 rwkw @ 6750 rpm

292 rwkw @ 6250 rpm

280 rwkw @ 5750 rpm

240 rwkw @ 5250 rpm

200 rwkw @ 4750 rpm

140 rwkw @ 4250 rpm

249 rwkw Average

So in my opinion if GTSS's make 249 rwkw average between 4,250 rpm and 7,250 rpm then they are better than 2530's for all round use.

Over to you.

SK, i'm not sure that doing a comparison based on those revs (4250 ->7250) is going to be that valid. I'm pretty sure that a big single could whip those figures at all rpms quoted - does this mean a T88 is better than 2530's?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A few things that seem a bit off here. - why is there 2 BOV’s?  - the turbo smart BOV on the compressor housing, is it turned up ALL the way? I have seen this become an issue on old man Pete’s car. It would push open and recirc, turbo speed would rise and the boost pressure would do weird things. - stock head? Does that include springs? - tried a different MAC valve? Is it plumbed correctly?
    • Photo of manifold showing gate location? I mean, it's 6Boost, so we probably shouldn't be worrying, but always wroth knowing what the layout is. Plumbed back to atmosphere? Or into the dump?
    • Yes correct. Also, I'd avoid applying it to soft paint (however I doubt you'll ever have to deal with it in practice). So any paint that hasn't fully hardened, could be a 1k paint that never fully hardened or it could be a 2k paint that was laid down thick and hasn't yet fully hardened. 
    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
×
×
  • Create New...