Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, I'm gonna brave the near certain flames I am gonna get for this one, but has anyone out there ever made any enquiries about a dedicated gas conversion to a series 1 RB25DET? I have been asking a few fitters here in WA (wait awhile) and all I am getting is horror stories about melted pistons and such. Now, acording to my research, LPG has a much higher RON than even Premium Unleaded so, in theory, this would be a Good Thing in regards to the tuning scope allowed, not to mention the savings in fuel costs.

The fact that the WA gubberment is now offering $2000 on top of the Federal gubberments $1000 rebate plan means that I will be spending bugger all of my own money to get this done.

My main questions about the conversion are centred around the fact that this would have to be a "blow through" set up and what effects is this likely to have on the standard throttle body? I am seriously considering this because I believe that with a gas dedicated cam grind, a purpose built exhaust and some quality time on the dyno, 200awkw would not be out of the question.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142404-gas-conversions/
Share on other sites

I think the "Gas Research" gas throttle body in place of std TB would compensate for turbo pressure similar to a rising rate Fuel Press. Reg. does.

Gas Injection like the new Fords have is probably the way to go though, but I dont know if this is available aftermarket or not and wether it would be able to be tuned by aftermarket ECU.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142404-gas-conversions/#findComment-2651766
Share on other sites

Here’s a quick run down on why LPG is a bad idea;

1. You need 1.3 litres of LPG to go as far as 1 litre of 98 ron.

2. The LPG tank (being a pressure vessel) has thicker walls, hence for the same outside dimensions it will hold 20% less.

3. Add 1 & 2 together and it means 50% less distance between refills compared to he same dimensioned petrol tank.

4. LPG is now 99 ron, the 110 ron dropped to get the price down

5. There isn’t an LPG system designed for RB’s, so you would need one to be made up “special”. Think lots of $’s.

6. They will use a single point gas mixer (not 6 injectors, not sequential), it will simply be connected to the throttle, more throttle opening = more gas squirted in. No fuel mapping as such.

7. Your standard ECU will run the ignition etc

8. Driveability, cold start and run, hot run etc will all suffer as a result of the poor (in comparison) fuel metering.

9. If you live in a cold area you won’t be able to drive your car until it warms up. If you don’t warm it up, drive off and accidentally use too much throttle you may well get a gas explosion in the inlet system. Not large enough to hurt you but large enough to require a top end rebuild.

And a few others I have forgotten.

:wave: cheers :P

I don't think it is a great idea...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142404-gas-conversions/#findComment-2651771
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
×
×
  • Create New...