Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, for no particular reason other than curiosity I am looking for a list of performance cars and their power/torque to weight ratios.

anyone have such a list?

interested in any/as many as you have or if s0omeone has a site that lists some.

did a fair bit of googling and found none.

just interested as to what else is in the range of

5.75kw/kg..

Edited by CEF11E
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/142739-power-to-weight-ratios/
Share on other sites

Any good with a calculator?

In doing calculations, weight is specified in tonnes (1000kg = 1 tonne); capacity is specified in litres (1000ml = 1 litre); power is specified in kilowatts (kw) and is measured at the engine flywheel.

The weight of a vehicle is the unladen mass specified by the manufacturer for the stock standard vehicle

For example, a V8 vehicle weighs 1382kg with a power rating of 185kw.

Therefore, the power to weight ratio is: 185/1382 x 1000 = 130kw per tonne.

hope that helps :P

I am going to assume you are meaning 5.75 kg/kw not 5.75 kw/kg, since the latter would be the equivalent of a Toyota Yaris with 6,000kw, or a VE Commodore with 10,000kw...

Best bet is Motor magazine - full list of performance cars currently on sale in Australia with their power to weight ratios. I'll chuck some in for an example, for a complete list just buy the magazine!

Sedans:

12.1 kg/kw Audi A4 1.8T Quattro - ouch!

11.5 kg/kw Mazda 6

8.8 kg/kw BF Ford Falcon

8.8 kg/kw VE Holden Commodore SV6

7.5 kg/kw Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX

7.2 kg/kw Subaru WRX STi

6.9 kg/kw BF Ford XR6 Turbo

6.7 kg/kw Audi S4 V8

6.6 kg/kw VE Commodore SS

6.6 kg/kw Maserati Quattroporte

6.4 kg/kw BF FPV F6 Typhon

6.3 kg/kw BF FPV GT

6.1 kg/kw BMW 550i

6.0 kg/kw Audi A8 W12

6.0 kg/kw Chrysler 300C SRT8

6.0 kg/kw Jaguar S-Type R

6.0 kg/kw Mercedes E500

5.9 kg/kw VE HSV Clubsport R8

5.6 kg/kw Jaguar XJR

5.3 kg/kw Audi RS4 V8

5.1 kg/kw BMW M5 V10

4.7 kg/kw Mercedes E63 AMG

Coupes:

10.2 kg/kw Hyundai Tiburon V6

9.7 kg/kw Audi TT 1.8T

7.9 kg/kw HSV Astra VXR

7.1 kg/kw Nissan 350Z

6.8 kg/kw BMW 335Ci

6.2 kg/kw Lotus Exige

6.2 kg/kw Porsche Cayman S

6.0 kg/kw Chrysler Crossfire SRT6

5.9 kg/kw BMW M3

5.8 kg/kw Mercedes CLK500

5.8 kg/kw Porsche 911

5.7 kg/kw HSV GTO

5.7 kg/kw Lotus Exige S

5.7 kg/kw Maserati Gransport

5.6 kg/kw Bentley Continental GT

5.6 kg/kw Mercedes CL600

5.4 kg/kw Porsche 911S

5.3 kg/kw Aston Martin DB9

5.0 kg/kw Aston Martin Vantage

5.0 kg/kw Mercedes CLK63 AMG

4.7 kg/kw Mercedes CL65 AMG - it takes a LOT of power to get something this heavy so far down the list :P

4.6 kg/kw BMW M6

4.6 kg/kw Ferrari 612

4.5 kg/kw Porsche 911 Turbo

4.0 kg/kw Ferrari F430

4.0 kg/kw Lamborghini Gallardo

3.9 kg/kw Lamborghini Murciellago

3.7 kg/kw Ferrari 599GTB

3.0 kg/kw Pagani Zonda C12 S

...and bored now. That better be what you want coz it took me like 15 minutes to type it all out...

This one copied (not typed!) from Supercar's.net - the top 50 powertoweight supercars:

1. 1000.0 bhp per tonne : 2007 Caparo T1

2. 963.27 bhp per tonne : 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero TT

3. 902.56 bhp per tonne : 2000 TVR Cerbera Speed 12

4. 890.59 bhp per tonne : 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero

5. 862.07 bhp per tonne : 2005 Leblanc Mirabeau

6. 757.89 bhp per tonne : 2006 a.d. Tramontana V12

7. 754.12 bhp per tonne : 2004 Orca C113

8. 747.38 bhp per tonne : 2006 Saleen S7 Twin Turbo Competition

9. 727.27 bhp per tonne : 1991 Koenig C62

10. 724.64 bhp per tonne : 2006 Gemballa Mirage Evolution

11. 708.74 bhp per tonne : 1994 Dauer 962 LeMans

12. 683.05 bhp per tonne : 2006 Koenigsegg CCX

13. 673.68 bhp per tonne : 2005 Ultima GTR 640

14. 655.2 bhp per tonne : 2004 Koenigsegg CCR

15. 650.84 bhp per tonne : 2004 Chrysler ME Four-Twelve Concept

16. 640.0 bhp per tonne : 2003 Radical SR3 Turbo

17. 633.71 bhp per tonne : 2004 SSC Aero

18. 626.09 bhp per tonne : 2002 Laraki Fulgura Concept

19. 625.0 bhp per tonne : 1992 DP 962

20. 615.38 bhp per tonne : 1995 Renault Espace F1 Concept

21. 611.11 bhp per tonne : 1998 Koenigsegg CC Concept

22. 605.0 bhp per tonne : 2005 Radical SR8

23. 595.45 bhp per tonne : 2000 Koenigsegg CC

24. 590.91 bhp per tonne : 2006 Gumpert Apollo

25. 588.85 bhp per tonne : 2006 Sportec SPR1

26. 571.43 bhp per tonne : 2006 Mosler MT900 GTR

27. 560.54 bhp per tonne : 2005 Saleen S7 Twin Turbo

28. 550.09 bhp per tonne : 1994 McLaren F1

29. 550.0 bhp per tonne : 2006 Ferrari P4/5 by Pininfarina

30. 545.83 bhp per tonne : 2002 Koenigsegg CC 8S

31. 531.91 bhp per tonne : 2004 Caterham Superlight R500 Evolution

32. 524.81 bhp per tonne : 2004 Evans 486

33. 524.34 bhp per tonne : 2005 Edo MC12 R

34. 523.08 bhp per tonne : 2001 B.Engineering Edonis

35. 522.45 bhp per tonne : 1997 Dodge Dakota Sidewinder Concept

36. 514.47 bhp per tonne : 2006 Donkervoort D8 RS06

37. 510.2 bhp per tonne : 2005 Pagani Zonda C12 F

38. 507.81 bhp per tonne : 2006 Pagani Zonda C12 F Roadster

39. 504.41 bhp per tonne : 2006 Factory Five Racing GTM

40. 500.1 bhp per tonne : 2006 MB Roadcars EOS

41. 496.14 bhp per tonne : 2006 Carbontech Redback Spyder

42. 496.03 bhp per tonne : 2002 Morgan Aero 8 GT

43. 491.53 bhp per tonne : 1986 Ford RS200 Evolution

44. 488.89 bhp per tonne : 1970 Lamborghini Miura Jota

45. 481.75 bhp per tonne : 2002 Ferrari Enzo

46. 475.0 bhp per tonne : 1998 Westfield FW400

47. 474.15 bhp per tonne : 2004 Fuore BlackJag Concept

48. 470.59 bhp per tonne : 2005 Lotus Sport Exige

49. 470.17 bhp per tonne : 2006 Lingenfelter 427 Corvette Commemerative Edition

50. 468.75 bhp per tonne : 2006 Ascari A10

Edited by Big Rizza

Compare to imports:

8.7 kg/kw 1988 S13 Silvia K's (CA18DET)

8.4 kg/kw 1992 R32 Skyline GTS-T Type M

7.7 kg/kw 1991 S13 Silvia K's (SR20DET)

7.6 kg/kw 1999 R34 Skyline GT-R V-Spec

7.5 kg/kw 1996 R33 Skyline GT-R V-Spec

7.4 kg/kw 1996 R33 Skyline GTS-T Type-M

7.3 kg/kw 1994 R32 Skyline GT-R V-SpecII

7.3 kg/kw 1999 JZA80 Supra RZ

7.0 kg/kw 1993 Toyota MR-2 GT-S

6.8 kg/kw 1998 R34 Skyline GT-T

6.7 kg/kw 2002 Nissan S15 Spec R

6.6 kg/kw 1991 Honda NSX

6.1 kg/kw 2002 Mazda RX-7 Type R

Obviously some of these are misleading due to some models having actual power slightly higher than the quoted 206kw.

I'm tired now... no more typing...

Edited by Big Rizza

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah yep. I asked a auto electrician about getting a cheap rebuilt alternator vs a new one. He also said he used to it back in the day but it ended up costing similar to what a new one would and recommended getting a new one,.
    • Ah, to clarify if the car has already been tuned and has been modified and you want to go from a oem cat to a 100 cell or decat or vice versa.Are you saying that the car doesn't need to be tuned after a cat change if it's already been tuned?
    • This has been covered a bazillion times but google wet boiling point vs dry. Motul is only good when it's fresh, once it absorbs moisture it gets pretty average very quickly. So as above, make sure you change it if you're going racing. I run the Endless brake fluid in mind, but only because a mate is a distributor and it's cheap. It's not quite as good as SRF but I'm running 380mm rotors on a Skyline so it's not like they get hot.
    • That's the thing, they still add it and it makes fuel cheaper, implying adding 10% of it drops the cost of 91 by what, 5c a liter? I remember when it was barely half the price of 98. Because you know, 85% of what is in the fuel is way cheaper than 91 fuel is by volume.
    • Auto electricians that do repairs on automotive AC systems can source service kits. I don't know where they actually source them. I do know that there is one available for the R34 comp that I would need it for. If you have to pay someone to dismantle, clean and do needed repairs and fit kit contents, then you'd probably end up spending a good fraction of the cost of a new one. I would not be paying for that, because I would be doing it myself. My mechanic (bro-in-law) will happily source what is needed. Back in the day (like in the 80s and 90s), rebuilding an AC compressor was the standard approach, same as for starter motors, alternators, etc, because new replacements were v. expensive. After the China manufacturing boom and the rise of the disposable approach to everything, people just started throwing broken/worn stuff away and not rebuilding things.
×
×
  • Create New...