Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PLEASE CONTACT PAUL FOR MORE DETAILS ON THIS CAR: 0438 377 028

ENGINE :

2.7 LITRE

T88-34D TURBO ( HIGH FLOWED AND OVERHAULED )

HKS MANIFOLD

EXTERNAL WASTEGATE

N1 BLOCK

TOMEI PISTONS

TOMEI RODS

TOMEI CAMS

NISMO METAL HEAD GASKET

HKS VALVES

HKS VALVE SPRINGS

HKS VALVE GUIDES

HEAD PORTING

TOMEI TIMING GEARS

NISMO OIL PUMP

GTR33 BALANCED CRANK

JUN OIL BLOCK

JUN OIL BAFFLE

MILES OIL COOLER

ARC ALUMINIUM RADIATOR

CUSTOM INTERCOOLER PIPING

TRUST BLOW OFF

Z32 AIR FLOW METERS

APEXI AIR INTAKE FLUTES

CUSTOM OIL CATCH CAN

NISMO 720cc INJECTORS

GREDDY FUEL RAIL

NISMO FUEL REG

BOSCHE RACING FUEL PUMP

TRAIL SURGE TANK

POWER EXTREME 680x280x120 HUGE INTERCOOLER

TRUST 3” FULL STAINLESS EXHAUST SYSTEM

NISMO TIMING BELT

CAM COVERS AND PLUG COVER CUSTOM PAINTED

EXTENSIVE USE OF BRAIDED LINES

DRIVE CHAIN:

OS GEIKEN TRIPLE PLATE CLUTCH AND FLY WHEEL

OS GEIKEN CROSS RATIO GEARBOX ( 1st, 2nd AND 3rd )

CUSCO LSD

SUSPENSION:

TEIN COILOVERS

NISMO FRONT AND REAR STRUT BRACE

HKS UPPER LINK

MINES STABILISER

CUSCO PILLAR TENSIONER

BRAKES :

BREMBO CALLIPERS

MILES BRAIDED BRAKE HOSES

TOMEI MASTER CYLINDER STOPPER

NISMO BRAKE PADS

WHEELS

18x 10.5 DT-05 WHITE RIMS

NEW 235 x 40 KUHMO TYRES

ALLOY WHEEL NUTS

ELECTRONIC :

APEXI POWER FC AND COMMANDER

HKS BOOST CONTROLLER

HKS TURBO TIMER

BLITZ TORQUE CONTROLLER

ULTRA SPEED & REV DIGITAL METER

INTERIOR:

TOMEI 310 KM SPEEDO

BRIDE FIXED BACK RACING SEAT

HKS PEAK HOLD BOOST GAUGE

HKS EXHAUST TEMP GAUGE

GREDDY OIL PRESSURE GAUGE

GREDDY OIL TEMP GAUGE

GREDDY WATER TEMP GAUGE

GREDDY FUEL PRESSURE GAUGE

CARBON FIBRE DASH SURROUND

5 ZIGEN RACING STEERING WHEEL

FACTORY 10 STACKER CD PLAYER

EXTERIOR:

CUSTOM PAINT PROFESSIONALLY PAINTED BY DMD BRISBANE

NISMO BONNET LIP

NISMO INTERCOOLER AIR DUCT

THIS CAR HAS RECENTLY BEEN INSPECTED AT GAVIN WOODS WORKSHOP AND COMPRESSION TESTED ETC. ALSO HAS BEEN FULLY TUNED BY MATTHEW SPRY AT PITS PERFORMANCE TUNING.

$ 37,900

bluegtr32frontjq2.jpg

ca2vs5mjzd4.jpg

caevc9mvey6.jpg

caoh14vxbs9.jpg

Edited by 07xtc
bump. why advertise if your not going to answer your phone. ffs

Hey guys Im paul the guy who owns the car. The car is definitely not an x drifter also empivian I cant understand why you say I dont answer my phone - I have never had a message from you on my phone and if I did I would I would ring you back immediately.

awesome gtr goodluck with the sale

how much power this baby putting out?

took it the track yet?

Havent taken it on the track yet . It made 450 HP at 1.3 ( safe tune )

has a balanced r33 gtr crank as in spec list

Sorry Paul havnt been on here to check the net. Been flat out with work.

I can say that this car is one of the nicest GTR's I have ever layed eyes on, top quality build. And I am not just saying this because it is a friend's car. I can honestly say that you wont ever be able to find a GTR and then modify it (to the quality that this is) the way this one has been modified and have any change left of twice or more than the asking price.

This car has hardly even been on the road since it came in from Japan let alone been drifted. It has been off to shops being modified, and having dollars spent on it! Paul imported this car and has imported several other high performance import cars (some of which are drift cars) so yes you will see his number spread across many forums.

Enjoy cleaning your underwear after going for a ride in this animal LOL

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, all the crude is used for fuels and petrochem feedstocks (pesticides, many other chemicals, etc etc). But increasingly over the last few decades, much of the petrochem synthessis has started with methane because NG has been cheaper than oil, cleaner and easier and more consistent to work with, etc etc etc. So it's really had to say what the fraction either way is. Suffice to say - the direct fuels fraction is not insigificant. Heavy transport uses excruciatingly large amounts. Diesel is wasted in jet heaters in North American garages and workshops, thrown down drill holes in quarries, pissed all over the wall to provide electricity to certain outback communities, etc etc. Obviously road transport, and our pet project, recreational consumption camouflaged as road transport, is a smaller fraction of the total liquid HC consumption again. If you're talking aboust Aussie cars' contribution to the absolute total CO2 production of the country, then of course our share of the cubic mile of coal that is used for power generation, metallurgy, etc adds up to a big chunk. Then there is the consumption of timber. Did you know that the production of silicon metal, for example, is done in Australia by using hardwood? And f**king lots and lots and lots of hardwood at that. Until recently, it was f**king jarrah! There are many such sneaky contributors to CO2 production in industry and farming. NG is used in massive quantities in Australia, for power gen, for running huge water pumps (like, 1-2MW sized caterpillar V16 engines running flat out pumping water) for places like mine sites and minerals/metals refineries. And there are just a huge number of those sort of things going on quietly in the background. So NG use is a big fraction of total CO2 production here. I mean, shit, I personally design burners that are used in furnaces here in Oz that use multiple MW of gas all day every day. The largest such that I've done (not here in Oz) was rated to 150MW. One. Single. Gas burner. In a cement clinker kiln. There are thousands of such things out there in the world. There are double digits of them just here in Oz. (OK< just barely double digits now that a lot of them have shut - and they are all <100MW). But it's all the same to me. People in the car world (like this forum's users) would like to think that you only have to create an industrial capability to replace the fuel that they will be using in 10 years time, and imagine that everyone else will be driving EVs. And while the latter part of that is largely true, the liquid HC fuel industry as a whole is so much more massive than the bit used for cars, that there will be no commercial pressure to produce "renewable" "synthetic" fuels just for cars, when 100x that much would still be being burnt straight from the well. You have to replace it all, or you're not doing what is required. And then you get back to my massive numbers. People don't handle massive numbers at all well. Once you get past about 7 or 8 zeros, it becomes meaningless for most people.
    • @GTSBoy out of the cubic mile of crude oil we burn each year, I wonder how much of that is actually used for providing petrol and diesel.   From memory the figure for cars in Australia, is that they only add up to about 2 to 3% of our CO2 production. Which means something else here is burning a shit tonne of stuff to make CO2, and we're not really straight up burning oil everywhere, so our CO2 production is coming from elsewhere too.   Also we should totally just run thermal energy from deep in the ground. That way we can start to cool the inside of the planet and reverse global warming (PS, this last paragraph is a total piss take)
    • As somebody who works in the energy sector and lives in a subzero climate, i'm convinced EV's will never be the bulk of our transport.  EV battery and vehicle companies over here have been going bankrupt on a weekly basis the last year. 
    • With all the rust on those R32s, how can it even support all the extra weight requirements. Probably end up handling as well as a 1990s Ford Falcon Taxi.
    • Yes...but look at the numbers. There is a tiny tiny fraction of the number of Joules available, compared to what is used/needed. Just because things are "possible" doesn't make them meaningful.
×
×
  • Create New...