Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 251
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

rb25 auto awd - front driveshaft pulled for rwd dyno

249rwkw at 17/16psi 3rd gear

Garrett GT3076 700177-5015 IWBB Turbocharger with ported Nissan 45V4 front / AVO .73 rear housings

60mm diameter 84-trim GT30 turbine and 76mm diameter 7/14 bladed compressor wheel in 56.9-trim

JDM S15 Silvia 450/480cc injectors

z32 afm, tomei head, 3" exhaust, remap

I used a Dynapack hub dyno, they read higher than DD - its not magically higher but enough to make a difference. I don't know what the difference is, the one I did 300kw on is thought of by a few (who are used to Dynapacks) consider it a heart breaker for hub dynos but still no DD style heart breaker.

I know this is probably annoying for you, honestly it was for me too and its all my fault - so sorry about this. I have never removed the PRV as I don't have some vacuum hose long enough to reach from the wastegate to the boost source... the PRV has been spliced into my old one since I got it. I went and grabbed some the other day and went to put it on for the dyno tune (which was booked at the last moment) and found it didn't fit. The result of that is the PRV keeps snapping open and closed and stuffing up the boost curve and makes it not a realistic representation :D

For what its worth, when the PRV settles down the boost holds very very stable - I am going to get some vacuum hose that suits and am being hassled into putting my car on a dyno day in a couple of weeks so may end up just giving in to that without the valve and seeing what that does to the curve. I'll post the boost plot from that :happy: I didn't even bother getting this one printed.

Its definitely going to make it build less, not more aggressively when I remove it - the curve will be more consistant. Strangely it doesn't seem to behave the way it appeared to on the dyno on the road.... Not sure what was up with that.

  • 2 months later...

just read through most of this thread, some very informative stuff in here!

seems there is not much love for the 3071 .82; is the 3076 .82 really that much better for someone chasing 260-270rwkw?

just read through most of this thread, some very informative stuff in here!

seems there is not much love for the 3071 .82; is the 3076 .82 really that much better for someone chasing 260-270rwkw?

3076 .82 would be the way to go. you will get bored with 270rwkw. atleast with the 3076 you have some more power left in it.

my 3076 makes 335rwkw on e85.

Good to see this thread still going! I see it a lot when I am googleing.

how do some of u guys get over 300kw with only 17psi on 3076r? hmmmm

I made 314rwkw on 18psi with water methanol injection. Torque was 720nm from 3000rpm all the way to the limiter.

mods:

Garrett GT3076, 0.6 compressor cover, 0.63 rear housing

Powerfc (Tuned by me)

Water Methanol Injection

Standard Engine

Standard Manifolds

Front mount Intercooler

Big Exhaust

Nismo 555cc Injectors

Standard FPR

Nismo 275lph In tank pump

just read through most of this thread, some very informative stuff in here!

seems there is not much love for the 3071 .82; is the 3076 .82 really that much better for someone chasing 260-270rwkw?

They aren't really that great. Better off with a GT3076 with a 0.63 rear.

3076 .82 would be the way to go. you will get bored with 270rwkw. atleast with the 3076 you have some more power left in it.

my 3076 makes 335rwkw on e85.

I'll be keen to test that with the RB30.

what would be the difference in response though?

not with a 0.63 rear.

I have a like new 0.63 internal gate rear housing for sale if anybody wants it, and a dump pipe to cat to suit. I'm unloading it because I have a RB2530 and the 0.63 rear might be fun, but is a little too restrictive for the RB30s extra breathing.

Sale thread here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...ml#entry5264403

  • 6 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

i'm looking at buying one of these

700177-5007

gt3076R

external gate

front trim 56, .60 ar front surge slotted

.84 rear trim, .82 4 bolt rear

i have the option of the .60 or .70 front

is tthere going to be much difference?

my combination at the moment is a standard rb25det

Ive got a 6boost and plazmaman

was recently making 300rwkw on a standard exhaust manifold. 3076R.70 front. .82 rear internal gated

i

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sag as in the windows start to slowly open themselves, or they're just slow to go up/down with engine off?
    • It looks like it needs a big worm gear drive on it to control the rotating, not a few sloppy pins!
    • As Duncan said, first there was OBD, which few cars used, then came OBD2.   Now an interesting point, OBD2 isn't even for what you want to do. OBD2 is for emissions testing. There is some sensor data on OBD2, but it's up to the manufacturer what they're putting on it. Most scan tools operate on UDS, which like OBD2 is a standard built on-top of CAN. UDS specifies how to structure a message, what very limited things mean such as "read memory address" but it does not specify what is stored in which memory address, that is all up to the manufacturer. You either a scan tool compatible with that vehicle, or to know how to reverse engineer all the data, which can take a VERY long time and a lot of vehicles to get it right. Oh and then the manufacturer does a firmware update and changes what's where... Ask me how I know that as fact Oh, and by the time you've got the scan tool that supports all the manufacturers stuff, well, you're back at "But a consult cable and the Nissan software" The main difference being most manufacturers software these days works with the same hardware readers, as the readers are built to support J2534 which is another standard for how the PC communicates with the tool to make it do specific things on the car...
    • Rotisserie is fully assembled apart from centre connector which obviously isn't required until the car is on it. It packs away fairly neatly and doesn't take up too much room. (Now that I actually have some room after my clean up!) Overall very happy with the quality of it.  Assembly was a piece of piss.  The only thing I didn't like was that the pins that lock the rotation lock wheels in place were a bit of a dick in a bucket scenario. It allowed the arms to rotate a significant amount even when locked in place.  To fix that i measured up the hole and went and grabbed a couple of 18mm fully threaded bolts and a thread tap to suit. I ran the tap through top and bottom so it was threaded both ends.  Then just threaded the bolt through both sides.  It has made a massive difference which hopefully you can tell in the before and after video how much difference it made. 20250207_161431.mp4   20250207_161431.mp4 Hopefully back working on the car over the next few weeks.   20250207_162801.mp4
    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
×
×
  • Create New...