Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, just had a quick question

i did the rb25 transplant in my 32 a little while back and have noticed it is a little more front heavy.

Does anyone know exactly how much more the rb25 weighs compared to the rb20?

Also, to counteract this problem, would fitting a CF or fibreglass bonnet fix the problem?

The car does feel a little more front heavy at times which is only noticable with some spirited driving.

Anyone else have this problem and have a good solution?

Cheers and thanks in advance :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143198-weight-balance-of-r32/
Share on other sites

I call placaebo effect. The RB25 is on a very basic level essentially an RB20 with bigger holes in the engine block, so I wouldn't think the weight shift would be much. The amount of fuel in the car would have more of an effect on weight balance than the new engine IMO.

Anyone got the actual engine weights?

i do remember seeing a thread a few months back where someone knew the actual figure differences of the two engines.

think it was in the 100's or something. can anyone confirm that?

also, how much weight does replacing the stock bonnet with a fibreglass item save?

This is a good question, Im planning the rb25 conversion now and would like to know the weight difference and how it affects the balance of the car.

I have a few other questions for you phantom:

Did you change the gearbox aswell? do you have to?

How is it to drive? is the torque increase huge?

Sorry to hijack the thread with my dumb questions but hey :pirate:

i do remember seeing a thread a few months back where someone knew the actual figure differences of the two engines.

think it was in the 100's or something. can anyone confirm that?

also, how much weight does replacing the stock bonnet with a fibreglass item save?

There's like 100kg between the SR20, an all alloy 4 cyl, and the RB20, an iron block 6cyl. I can't imagine the gap between RB20 and RB25 to be greater than the gap between SR20 and RB20... COuld be mistaken though...

Tuff R32 - yes, i did the gearbox too

in short, once u have the rb25 you will realise how much of a lagger the rb20 was. Torqe is increased dramatically, overall driveability is greater, you don't need to hit boost to get the car to move.

I've also been told that a 200rwkw rb25 in an r32 can do a 12sec run?? altho i'm not sure on those figures.

If u have any other questions on whats required to make it all fit, shoot me a PM>

Rizz, i know u know heaps about the different models nissan produces - anything in there about engine weights?

we're talking high twelves aren't we?

with good driver skill.

my mate had 230kwatw in his 180 and ran a 12.5 on street tyres and we consider him a pretty damn good driver.

i'm a little doubtful about 12's with 200kw....was at calder the other night and there were easily 200+ lines there but they were doing in the 13's

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The smart thing is to actually locate the pump at the right point down the hanger, so that the strainer can stay sticking out at a right angle, but near the bottom. This is the perpetual hassle with retrofitting any different pump to the factory hanger. Some just go where you need it to, some need fiddling and faffing, and modifying of stuff.
    • Some updates. After a lot of praying and some inspecting of crank threads, we've found that they were both kinda munted but nothing seemed terminal. The other option was drilling and helicoiling the crank. That is obviously the last option so we decided to at least try to get a OEM GM bolt in to GM Specs. So after honing/linishing the balancer from it's .002" interference fit to a .0018" to .0015" to .0013" it eventually slotted on to the crank. ATI state the interference is nominally 0.0007-0.0009... so it's still snugger than ATI reckon and explains the issues we had to fit the thing to begin with. New GM bolt went in at 37 ft/lb then torqued 140 degrees after which was EXTREMELY   but it tightened up to 140 degrees and it was a lot of force. So all things considered, the balancer is secured to the exact specs that GM want with the OEM Stretch bolt, (that ATI say you can use..) and the balancer itself is seated and snug AF. So WOO. Engine is now back in the car with lots of swearing. Bellhousing bolts done up, driver side manifold is on, AC Compressor and hard lines are back on the car. Next step will be to connect various engine bits/wiring/intake/radiator etc. Then oil and coolant and ... test start it? And of course, looking into this issue... which actually doesn't look so bad - It looks like it can be twisted back into shape with a set of multigrips. Anyone wanna buy my bonnet? Boy it looks good over there and sunk cost sucks.
    • Also this may be a stupid question, but how would you recommend getting the strainer on a downwards angle ? as they tend to obviously clip to the bottom of the pump which usually sits level 🥴
    • Most of the R33 GTST S1 are all like "airbag? What airbag?!"
×
×
  • Create New...