Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

Just wondering if any GTS-4 drivers have put a boost gauge into their car. I've searched and found instructions for a GTS-t and a GTR, but say to splice the stock boost gauge line, which the GTS-4 does not have. I could have a crack at finding a solution, but thought I may as well ask if anyone has done it before.

The GTS-4 really is the oddball of the family, maybe we need our own section.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143508-boost-gauge-into-r32-gts-4/
Share on other sites

No, there isn't. But there is provision to put a fitting in the back of the plenum. (While you are there, why not re-locate the turbo wastegate line up there as well.)

Or, you can 'T' into the FPR hose.

While you are there, why not re-locate the turbo wastegate line up there as well.)

don't take this advice. it can cause spiking. and you want your wastegate line as short as possible. thats why a lot of turbos have the wastegate line come straight off the compressor housing. it is also best to have the wastegate line before the intercooler so that your turbo only ever works at a certain max boost. if it is after the cooler, and the cooler ads a fair bit of restriction at higher boost, the engine may be only getting 12psi, but the turbo may be producing more. which means more pressure, more heat, less life.

don't take this advice. it can cause spiking. and you want your wastegate line as short as possible. thats why a lot of turbos have the wastegate line come straight off the compressor housing.
so that as the compressor spools up, it spikes the wastegate, and before the engine has even seen the increased boost, the exhaust gas is dumped past the exhaust wheel.
it is also best to have the wastegate line before the intercooler so that your turbo only ever works at a certain max boost. if it is after the cooler, and the cooler ads a fair bit of restriction at higher boost, the engine may be only getting 12psi, but the turbo may be producing more. which means more pressure, more heat, less life.
so that the engine never sees the "wastegated" boost. Unless you pick up the signal for the boost gauge off the back of the compressor, your turbo will always be producing more boost than the boost gauge is indicating.
which means more pressure, more heat, less life.

RE: The actuator boost signal

The ideal place is to always receive the boost signal from the plenum. But this is not really optimal as it requires a long run from the plenum to the actuator. Only possible when using an EBC.

So... Just do what Nissan did with the R33. Run it from the IC pipe directly before the cross over pipe. Close enough is good enough.

The ideal place is to always receive the boost signal from the plenum. But this is not really optimal as it requires a long run from the plenum to the actuator. Only possible when using an EBC

if that is the case then why to hks and other turbo makes put a nipple on the compressor housing of the turbo? if the intercooler causes a restriction of 5psi at 15psi manifold pressure (example only) then the plenum is reading 15psi, but the turbo is actually running 20psi. thats why it is best to have both wastegate and gauge read before the cooler.

They don't place a nipple on the comp cover for the reason your suggesting.

Unless your talking stock turbo then running 20psi at the turbo isn't an issue providing the motor is tuned to run 15psi and all is well. At least you achieve a stable boost curve that doesn't tail off as airflow increases (as your ic restriction example would suggest)

Its only my view, I care less how much the turbo is pushing out as long as boost holds and makes power. :happy:

:P

i care more about how much the turbo is pushing out so i get a longer life from it. i'd rather know that my turbo is running at 12psi for sure than thinking my turbo was running at 12 psi when it is actually getting up as high as 14psi. then having it blow and wonder why it blew if i'm only running 12psi.

Its not actually that bad if you run an fmic.

My small bar/plate fmic (bar and plates known for being restrictive) has a pressure drop of 1.5psi at 580hp worth of air.

So unless your running on the stock IC worry not. :happy:

Years back Tim from RPM (Where used to take my car when I first got it) had an article in Zoom showing the pressure drop caused by the stock IC. It was measured up to ~7psi from memory on 11psi, at the same boost level 11psi the pressure drop was next to nothing.

Its not the boost that kills the turbo's anyway..

Tuning, detonation, high EGT's and a little bit of bad luck is what throws the wheel in to your (or lack of) cat.

but yeah, i'm talking stock turbo only. on an aftermarket turbo where there isn't as much chance of the exhaust wheel ending up in the cat it isn't so much of an issue.

So are you suggesting we take the boost reading from the turbo's nipple and set boost to 12psi from there NOT the plenum as every one else does?

  • 9 years later...

I am currently figuring out where to run the gauge from and this thread also confused me so if someone could reply with a clear answer as to where to run the vacuum line from that would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance

Ignore nearly everything said in this thread. I can't even bring myself to read most posts after the first completely stupid thing said in each one. Usually the first sentence.

The answer is so very very simple. Any tapping point on the plenum. Any tapping point at all. Any hole in the plenum that has a fitting that you can connect a vacuum hose to, and that does not have a one way valve or other stupidity in it. Any port in a storm.

And that's just to sort out the boost gauge connection silliness in this thread. The wastegate stupidnesses up there still have me shaking my head and I can't frame a coherent sentence to debunk the nonsense. Suffice to say....the correct advice has been posted on this forum umpteen dozen times.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can we see a scan of the original quote? The problem with engineers (and by this, I mean, all engineers across all engineering industries) is that there are "engineers" and there are "engineers" (you'll have to imagine the two different vocal emphases on those two versions of the same word. Engineering is a mindset - your farm kid who spent his life rebuilding the tractor will likely make a good engineer. The farm kid who spent his life taking photos of butterflies.. perhaps not. But on top of that mindset, the modern engineer has to learn how to write so that there is absolutely no way of being misunderstood. Proposals/budget estimates/quotations are one place where this is absolutely vital. You have to delineate your scope of supply with extremely hard boundaries, and anywhere where there is any possibility of not being able to have such a hard boundary, you need to write language that will cover you from scope creep, cost overruns, the inevitable interference of the client or their "engineer", etc etc. Now, if your clients are the BHPs and the Rio Tintos of the world, and similar, then you get good at this. If you are an automotive engineer, pitching work to the great unwashed masses, your skills in this area might not be well developed, because you're only dealing with knuckle draggers trying to get a big block legal in a Torana. And when I say "might not"....I'd suggest there's a better than even chance that any such skills might be completely absent. So, we might be able to look at your quote and see what the opportunities are for rebuttal.
    • It’s an rb25 so a gtst and I’ll get that valve
    • Thank you for this my turbo doesn’t have the nipple so I’ll get one installed in the turbo to Intercooler piping. I’ll get everything I need and locate it all using the information you both gave and get back with an update. 
    • Please do not connect it to your manifold. If you do, as GTS suggested please record the lot in 4K with good mics attached.   On the factory Skyline, there's a upside down pipe that allows it to breathe, looks like this   
    • For me I'd need some serious justification for why it has blown out.  Have you questioned him on it?  To be honest if you didn't question him right from the get-go on the first invoice that was already way over the initial quote and then you've (presumably) then paid another $1375 on top of the first invoice, then you're pushing shit uphill to get a favourable result now... It was years ago I last got an engineer out but it was around $450-$550 per visit.  That was just to inspect each progress point he gave me for the project.  Is he just doing progress inspections or is he providing engineering diagrams, technical assistance, etc??  If he's not, he's a filthy rip off merchant.  If the $3100 is the final sign off then you need to cop it on the chin, pay it and move on.  If it's not, piss him off and get a new one.  Not many Jeeps I'd value at $10K full stop let alone just engineering fees on a written off, half actual value WOVR Jeep....
×
×
  • Create New...