Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hah so true! I was trying to talk my mate into buying that 14k GTR with the dropped valve and putting his RB30DETT in it.. for some stupid reason he prefers it in his commodore? o_0 i must say though, on the strip with slicks there is no wheelspin whatsoever.. just very dangerous to drive on the street :D

His justification was that he couldn't bolt the powerglide up to the 4wd..

then he tried to talk me into buying the engine off him and putting it into my 32 gtst.. I don't think my poor lil 32 would like that too much..

Well i still use my stock cranck shaft and rev the to the 10k barrier. my cranck was extensively prepped tho. it was cryo treated and then nitrated to harden it up, then painstakenly balanced. i put the HKS damper on, and watch the revs fly. i dont push big horsepower on it. want to look into somthing more exotic next year, like a step 3 and a N1 or a GT block next year. i want to rev it 11800 :rofl::P

well thats a good question, how did i come up with this number. well evrybody wants 10k, 11k 12k. i want none of that, more in the terms that my car has to be exclusive. so i dont want to rev 12k, but 11800:D:D

also. if ya want to rev the thing like a motorbike your gonna have to spend som decent dollars up staris to do that. not to mension the oiling system.

cubes and 8k would be the most cost efective. and most of the 2.8 engines in japan stop making power at around 8.5k. evan with 3240's etc etc.

id say the tomie kit is better. just in finish and build quality

anyone have info on the Crower 2.9 kit?

Working on a 2.9L (88mm bore x 79mm stroke), but it will not be available

until Jan-Feb 2007.

Pricing depends on the style of rods, but in the neighborhood of $5000 w/BC Pro

Series (1500HP rating) or $5800 if Carrillo rods desired.

BC 4340 billet steel crankshaft.

BC 4340 Econo or Pro Series steel billet rods w/ARP 220,000 psi fasteners.

CP aluminum forged pistons (any bore size, any compression ratio).

9310 nickel carbon steel alloy wrist pins.

Ductile iron plasma top rings, tapered second ring, low tension oil rings.

Fully system balanced and ready to install.

88x79 gives you 2.883 L so i think it would be much safer to go 87x79 for a 2.818L

2.9 is pushing it.

and most of the 2.8 engines in japan stop making power at around 8.5k. evan with 3240's etc etc

Interesting... a friends GTR runs a 2.7L stroker kit and HKS 3240's and the thing doesnt even come close to making peak power till its past the 10,000rpm barrier, and I dont imagine a 2.8L would be that much different... maybe a few hundred rpm less. Granted while it is making alot of power at 8500rpm, its just starting to get really fun.

Having gone through all these options recently and doing alot of research, I went the JUN 2.7L stroker kit. Value for money its hard to beat. They have been used in many of Australia's high power GTR's with no reliability problems, and depending how much money you have spent on the head as well will spin up to 11,000rpm (change the rods and even higher) and handle mammoth amounts of power (said GTR above runs a JUN kit and reels off 600+kw at all four wheels day in day out).

As for the Nismo crank, I have it on good/reputable word that Tomei actually make them and they are one in the same.

Well i still use my stock cranck shaft and rev the to the 10k barrier. my cranck was extensively prepped tho. it was cryo treated and then nitrated to harden it up, then painstakenly balanced. i put the HKS damper on, and watch the revs fly. i dont push big horsepower on it. want to look into somthing more exotic next year, like a step 3 and a N1 or a GT block next year. i want to rev it 11800 :P:sick:

Why get it cryo treated and nitrided? Cryo is meant to work on the whoel grain structure while nitriding only does the skin grain structure to a couple of thou. I wouldnt have thought it was needed to do both ?

Has anyone every tried to alter the geometry of an RB engine to really make it rev?

What about using an RB30 block with and RB26 crank and pistons. The de-stroke of the engine gives you 0.444" extra deck, and then using RB26 compression height pistons would give an extra 0.020" or so. To restore the deck to 0 you can then run a 6.4" conrod which changes the rod ratio to 2.2:1.

There is a huge range of chevy rods available that would help this too. TItanium and aluminium etc.

Also, i've read you can bore an RB30 block to a 90mm bore, so there's the 2.8lt capacity, plus a 2.2:1 rod ratio, and a crankshaft thats proven to high rpm's from factory.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...