Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

champion, Ill find out if they are the same

edit: they are I'll send you a PM

You sure bout that rolls? I remember seeing something in the RB30 build PDF giving specs and they looked different...

Ill go download it and find out...

EDIT:

Cam duration and lift is the same...Lobe centre angles are different.

David

Edited by R32Abuser

he only has the intake instead, bummer.

Anyone else got an rb25det exhaust cam they are looking to get rid of?

ive got one for a S1

but im in Thailand atm and won't be back until the 19th march if u can wait until then

Im looking for a few bits so that i can put the rb25 in my r31drift car!

-RB25 Clutch fan hub only

-RB25DET (S1if its any different?) Valley coil pack cover

-RB25DET S1 TPS

-RB25DET Turbo oil feed banjo bolts (Both on the block and turbo itself)

PM me on here if you have any of the above parts and want to get ride of them!

Edited by ljblacket

WTB:

Good condition (preferably) FACTORY undertray plastics and brake ducts for R32 GTR

Mine have half of the mounting holes broken, hence chasing new ones. If you have screws / clips to go with thats a bonus

Contact via PM if you have something

WTB:

Good condition (preferably) FACTORY undertray plastics and brake ducts for R32 GTR

Mine have half of the mounting holes broken, hence chasing new ones. If you have screws / clips to go with thats a bonus

Contact via PM if you have something

If you are going for a defect inspection you don't need them, mine were cut in half and one was missing completely. If you just want them then feel free to ignore this lol

If you are going for a defect inspection you don't need them, mine were cut in half and one was missing completely. If you just want them then feel free to ignore this lol

I think Mattys R32 race car wont be seeing the road. Its way off from getting off defect.

If you are going for a defect inspection you don't need them, mine were cut in half and one was missing completely. If you just want them then feel free to ignore this lol

nah, the GTR isnt registered mate, i need it for their actual aero benefits :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...