Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've found a hks cast exhaust manifold - used.

Facts: Its an external wastegate ported manifold with a T04 turbo mount.

Now the questions:

Can it be changed to a T3? I'm told this can be done.

Whats best leave as a T04 or change it to T3? Does this weaken the unit?

I was going to get it checked, decked, extrude honed, coated etc so it could be changed at the same time.

I wanted to run with a GT3076R [it was gunna be a IW but now I have the hks manifold it will be a WG], thus the change to T3.

If it can't be changed to a T3, can you get the GT3076 in T04? [i'll also check the turbobygarrett and ATP site on this one].

Comments and help appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/143987-hks-cast-exhaust-manifold/
Share on other sites

If it's a split-pulse manifold like this one

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=43991

then you don't want to try modifying the flange (you will find it very hard to weld the 'split'

part of a new flange on).

You also want to check it for cracks, like the ones displayed in that pic.

Regards,

Saliya

If its what I think it is its flanged for the RB26 head not RB20/25 . Originally part of a kit with their old dinosaur TA45S turbo .

ATP do a .82 and 1.06 AR T4 flanged housings but I think only for the GT35 turbine ie GT3582R and not integral waste gated . I think the 1.06 is split flange TO4 and the 0.82 open or single entry .

Nice for RB26/30 .

The one shown in the picture is definately from an rb26 ta45 kit. (nice crack btw)

The rb20/25 specific models seem to have a wider flange specifically to allow either a t3 or t4 turbine housing to be used. What i don't know is if the size of the outlet from the manifold is bigger on the t4 ones.

surely is. I have one down in the shed its a laser cut t3 tigged onto a laser cut t4 with studs screwed in to each side.

This is the one! Brought and paid for, coming to a street near me!

Its already been set up for the T3 turbo mount, just gotta check the threads etc are OK.

post-5748-1164074704.jpg

post-5748-1164074720.jpg

post-5748-1164074756.jpg

post-5748-1164074768.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...