Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

Was getting my HKS camshafts that have done 5000klms in my mates r33 GTR yesterday installed in my 32 GTR when I got a phonecall saying that they had installed the inlet 256 8.7mm lift but while installing the exhaust 264 8.7mm lift it broke. Now they are saying that HKS camshafts are of poor quality and that this happens all the time and they are passing the buck to HKS.

What I want to know is this the case? are HKS camshafts poor quality and is it like the lottery- some snap and some dont? any help on this would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144406-r32-gtr-broken-camshaft/
Share on other sites

Tell the workshop to cough up.

If they can't install a cam shaft without snapping it then they are are obviously doing something wrong. You can also point out that someone obviously managed to install them correctly once before as they were in your mates car.

Guys went to the workshop today and they are going to replace the broken cam with a new one.

Cheers for the replys on this.... hopefully should get some good power.. just for interest sake does anyone know how these cams inlet 256 8.7mm lift and exhaust 264 8.7mm lift will change the power? car has fc and 34 n1 turbos + injectors etc?

Edited by jonnyo

Easy to break the cams.

Even easier if your doing it on the cheap and didn't replace the cam retaining bolts/studs with new ones.

Hopefully you did replace them because that new cam/s may let go (along with the motor) later on thanks to a fatigued old bolt that breaks. You dont have much lift on those cams so you might be lucky. Then again.....

From what i have learnt off all Serious RB Engine builders is

If you havent smashed an oil pump or Snapped a cam your not a serious rb motor builder

this sounds pretty ridiculous, so your saying unless you have broken a cam whilst installing them your not a serious engine builder ??

if the torqueing procedure and order isnt followed correctly sure they will break, but thats because your either being lazy or dont know what your doing, i dont see how this makes you better/smarter somehow ?!

with that sort of logic, im finding it hard to understand what exactly went wrong in this case...

Edited by mokompri

The cams are so long that they are very fragile when being torqued down.

I blame the nissan torque steps being too few. I didn't trust them when I first un-torqued and then retorqued mine the first time and I had no issues. I threw in 3 extra steps in between to be sure.

I think if you do enough of them (cam changes) you are likely to break some, especially when customers aren't willing to go for the extra expense of new bolts. Add to that big cams and beefy springs and it doesn't help. 90% of the time old bolts might work could be even higher as a percentage but, that still means you do enough and you get a few broken ones.

The cams are so long that they are very fragile when being torqued down.

I blame the nissan torque steps being too few. I didn't trust them when I first un-torqued and then retorqued mine the first time and I had no issues. I threw in 3 extra steps in between to be sure.

I think if you do enough of them (cam changes) you are likely to break some, especially when customers aren't willing to go for the extra expense of new bolts. Add to that big cams and beefy springs and it doesn't help. 90% of the time old bolts might work could be even higher as a percentage but, that still means you do enough and you get a few broken ones.

Thats comming from hi octane

anyways

we made longer studs to help tension larger lift cams in straight

That happened to my car. the cams i was about to put in looked almost brand new. they were installed but fortunatly they broke before the covers went back on. the crack in the metal was there for a while, oil that was to lube the cam had penetrated the crack quite some way through which makes me think they were damaged or broken already. got tomei poncams now, all good!

Hi MR331307,

Who are Hioctane? Do you mean the company over east? or some sort of mag?

I initially did the torque steps because I took the cams off without a manual, so I was carefull and used a bit of logic to guestimate the sequence, kind of easy to do though. Then a friend let me have a look at the manual he had before I put the new cams in and I just decided there needed a few more steps.

The cams are so long that they are very fragile when being torqued down.

I blame the nissan torque steps being too few. I didn't trust them when I first un-torqued and then retorqued mine the first time and I had no issues. I threw in 3 extra steps in between to be sure.

I think if you do enough of them (cam changes) you are likely to break some, especially when customers aren't willing to go for the extra expense of new bolts. Add to that big cams and beefy springs and it doesn't help. 90% of the time old bolts might work could be even higher as a percentage but, that still means you do enough and you get a few broken ones.

lets stop for a second and see what your saying implies. "if you do enough cam changes you are likely to break some", now this begs the question... what about the ones that didnt break ?? why DIDNT they break ?

and so what seperated them, from the ones that broke ? if the problem is not with the installation, then it goes back to being the product, and i dont think a company like hks will have random quality control of their camshafts.

if nissans torqueing procedure isnt sufficient, then a "serious engine builder" should know better. either from experience (which the workshop in this topic claims to having), or knowledge.

and as for replacing new bolts, i dont see how this will affect breaking the cam, if the bolt is too fatigued/stretched to be reused, and is used, then it will snap/shear. it should not have any bearing on the breakage of the cam. i know this, because i snapped a bolt when i did my cam change :spank::sick:

Edited by mokompri

Mokompri,

The world of mechanics is ruled by Murphys law as well as those physics ones.

One of the most common misconceptions about using a torque wrench to tighten bolts like these or on a head is that the torque reading on the wrench indicates how much load is on each bolt. The reading on the wrench only tells you how much twisting force is being applied on each bolt. The actual clamping load will be much, much higher, and will depend on the friction in the threads, the size, pitch and diameter of the treads, and the length of the bolt, temp (good to do it on a hot day but, not for the person) and things like how long the stupid cam is and the bending forces it goes through on the way to sitting nicely in there.

For example a stretched bolt might bottom out at a different height to a healthy bolt from and therefore can give you issue. Sometimes not right away but, maybe the next week or next month it goes or you get lucky and nothing happens for a year till you go racing.

These bolts are run of the mill units that acheive maximum clamp at thier yeild point which if exceeded has them deform to some extent, permanently. Unlike a TTY style of head bolt these don't spring back up to it's yield point as they deform. So if they have had some use you are best to ditch them. It also means even new ones can cause grief as the leverage along such a long stick of metal makes for a bigger margin for error.

So change those old bolts and cross your fingers.

Hope that sheds some light.

Then again maybe an engine builder or two would like to put thier hand up for a record number of RB cam changes without a breakage?

Edited by rev210

physics i agree, but murphys law is philosophy - i dont think it belongs here. murphys law is something thats used when shit happens and the real problem cant be explained, but i believe theres a reason for everything.

friction on the threads should always be around the same, as your supposed to oil the bolts and the holes so that variation doesnt occur, and all those other variables stay the same anyways (size, pitch etc). the temperature variation you get in aus is probably around 20 degrees celcius through the year, hardly something that will have much affect in the process.

in my engine i had the snapped bolt removed, and replaced with a new one. the engine ran thousands of km's after that, then i sold the car. but anyways, with all that you have said it practically puts the cause of inconsistency here to murphys law, which doesnt really say much at all does it

physics i agree, but murphys law is philosophy - i dont think it belongs here. murphys law is something thats used when shit happens and the real problem cant be explained, but i believe theres a reason for everything.

friction on the threads should always be around the same, as your supposed to oil the bolts and the holes so that variation doesnt occur, and all those other variables stay the same anyways (size, pitch etc). the temperature variation you get in aus is probably around 20 degrees celcius through the year, hardly something that will have much affect in the process.

in my engine i had the snapped bolt removed, and replaced with a new one. the engine ran thousands of km's after that, then i sold the car. but anyways, with all that you have said it practically puts the cause of inconsistency here to murphys law, which doesnt really say much at all does it

Hey Guys,

Just for your info we have built over 1000 RB engines and have never had 1 breakage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of an update to this one. Having some issues on the dyno that held us back (boost spiking) and I want to pass some info over you guys and see what you think is wrong with my setup. The current readout on this dyno is 462rwkw on a low reading dyno so keep in mind it is a real world 500rwkw setup on a hub dyno. Don't read into the power figure too much as a sign of the issue. The short and curly of it is: 2.8 Litre Racepace build RB25 NEO N/A Head with VCT (internally standard however ) Borgwarner EFR 8474  Turbosmart 50mm Straight Gate + Mac valve 6Boost Manifold 4" dump to full 4" exhaust (nil restrictions) Wastegate plumbed back in and all angles in the exhaust system are acceptable and not too sharp. GFB SV52 BOV in cooler piping  Turbosmart BOV in EFR Housing   The issue we are having is it comes onto full boost for example at 4000rpm and spikes to 24/25psi, before dropping down to 17psi before slowly rising back up to the target boost of 23psi. It was extremely uncontrollable and the tuner actually had to ramp in boost progrssively with each 1000rpm on each boost setting we selected to try and reduce the amount of spiking. Sometimes we would see a drop of 10psi from the peak at the beginning of the run, to the low, until it took the next 500-1000rpm to stabilise back up to the target boost. The tuner is pretty confident that the straight gate is just a poorly designed product and leaks too much boost upon cracking the gate open and theres no way to fix it other than going to a poppet valve. He's also confient theres no ignition breakdown or floating valves. The fueling is extremely stable as well. Turbo speed is somewhere around the 109,000rpm area. The spanner in the works for me is that prior to this Borgwarner and StraightGate, the car was tuned on -5 twins at a diferent tuner, and he also had issues controlling the boost with it spiking around the same rpm range, so to me this sounds like the same issue and it can't be anything on the turbo side as this was all changed and I think the behaviour is extremely similar, if not the same. We also removed the mac valve and did a run on wastegate pressure and it still spiked and had the same behaviour. My thoughts on possibilities are: Boost Leak VCT Cam Gear isn't reliably activating consistently - (On this however, we did a run with the VCT disabled and the boost still spiked) Turbosmart BOV is not handling the boost? However this seems unlikely to not be able to handle 20psi. I have a couple of logs that I can't make sense of if anybody knows how to read them and can obtain further logs of other parameters if they are not enough, happy to pay for anyones time. The dyno readout with the power figure is the most recent last week. The other picture is from two weeks prior to that where we couldn't break 400kw (we removed the cat), however the issue of the boost control persisted. @Lithium @Piggaz @burn4005 @GTSBoy @discopotato03 I've tagged those that were quite active in recent pages here, no disrespect to those that know turbos well but I missed tagging. Cheers 
    • I recently purchased a 2018 Infiniti Q60, which has an SD card navigation map. I can see my system has options for real time traffic updates etc, and am wondering if there is something I can purchase to get this working? I can see there are at least updated maps for USA and Canada, but nothing for Australia. Surely Infiniti took changing road systems and city expansions into account when they decided to use an inbuilt navigation over Android Auto/Apple Car Play, or are we doomed to drive on streets that don't exist in the navigation system if you drive to a new area?
    • Luckily I didn't put in etch primer as I just found out it's not compatible with my body filler lol. Also just need to sand the panel anywhere between 150-400 grit so I'm in the clear there. It does say to not apply to soft old paint, I assume that means paint that is flaking, peeling,etc
    • @dbm7 and @GTSBoy thank you both very much! will give that a shot!
×
×
  • Create New...