Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im only 2 months new to my skyline and havent been on a long trip with it yet , i was wondering how many kms do you guys estimate on a full tank , going at 100/110 kms - any one know roughly how much i would be expecting to get ? thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/144689-fuel-consumption/
Share on other sites

hey mate i got rb25 same as you judging by your sig and i find that it uses little to none on the hwy to the coast n thats 110kms.. topped it back up to full yesterday after driving to the coast n back which is bout hour each way plus stuffin round n that while there n only took 20L which i thought was good !!

be interested to see what other people think

i usually drive from sydney to brisbane . in old car id fill up 2 full tanks and a just a quater . 1000 kms one way . smaller tank though and 4cyl ..

but i wouldnt boost her at all on the drive itd be good to get around 500

thanks for the posts

i do trips to coffs harbour all the time from syd, fairly stock r33. Used to get around 8L/100km but now my o2 sensor is on the blink i think i get around 10L/100km. So still not bad. City driving is a different story altogether, lucky to get 300km from 3/4 of a tank

Don't know my actual reading,

but I used to get 230KM to the halfway mark, around town.

Did a trip up the freeway yesterday, go home, sitting at 190km, and it's only on the 3/4 mark. So used half the fuel, for basically the same, and I generally get 12:/100 around town, so that's looking at around 6-8L/100KM on the freeway.

Damn good if you ask me (Considering if I felt like it, 6 or so seconds on full throttle in 5th gear has me seeing 170 odd KM/H if I need to overtake on a country highway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...