Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the map isnt closed loop, your fuel map is determined by the amount of air passing though your AFM.

your larger turbine will come in later and suck more air later, so until it comes on boost, the ECU will add the correct amount amount of fuel for manifold vacuum.

when it does come on boost, it will see more air going through the AFM and compensate with more fuel

i've got an safc2 which was tuned. from my knowledge about them they correct fuel at SET rpm points, not 'when the turbo kicks in'. someone correct me if im wrong.

i've got an safc2 which was tuned. from my knowledge about them they correct fuel at SET rpm points, not 'when the turbo kicks in'. someone correct me if im wrong.

You're not wrong :santa:

do you plan to turn the car off after a few hot runs to see if the bearings fail?

thats a serious question

Why would you want to do that? Seems stupid to me...

One of the important things about journal-bearing turbos is that oil flow must be maintained. Why would you want to risk farking the turbo by shutting the engine off when the turbo is red hot, just to see if it fails or not? Maybe it won't fail, but you may have caused minor damage which later compounds and causes a bearing to let go???

I would not encourage hot shutdown's, Even with ball bearing turbo's damage can be caused.

It is now common knowledge that doing hot shutdown's not only can damage your turbocharger but damage your engine.

The topic has been covered many times before and logic always prevails.

GTR's have nearly all journal bearing turbo's from factory and very rarely fail unless overboosted.

The failure is because they have ceramic turbines not because they are journal bearing.

Silvia's Journal bearing from factory.

Toyota Supras, Surf's, Celicas.... Journal bearing.

In some cases these are still all going after 100.000km.

So saying that journal bearing turbo's previously have shorter life spans then ball bearing is a little hillarious.

These at the end of the day have been driven like normal cars for many years and nothing has happened in most cases.

There are always a very few amount of people that like to start the debate up every time with the same outcome.

Sometimes hot shutdowns are unavoidable and i have had it occur many times due to something as little as an atmospheric blow off valve making the car stall.

I have pulled apart many turbo's after this instance and bearings have been fine.

There is this huge halo around ball bering turbo's and thoughts that they dont fail.

This is not true and i have had pallot loads of ball bearing turbo's taken away as they do not have the versatility that journal bearing turbo's do and ease of repair.

:D

yeah you know what, that makes sence. why risk farking my turbo? if it fails in the line of duty then so be it, but if it fails from me running it in a way where i wouldnt usually, then whats the point?

exactly.

There are just some haters out there that can't hack people buying $800 hiflows that are comparable to $1600 hiflows.

I won't raise the argument again, but just leave each to their own. I know what i'd rather spend the extra money on :D

  • 4 months later...

i thought an update was needed after so damn long.

the turbo is going strong. VERY strong. im running it on 14psi daily. might hit 18psi a bit later but i havent been bothered opening up my bonnet for a few weeks after all the time ive spent under it lately!

i've sold my SAFC and was getting around 380/tank with the tune i had. on the standard computer im getting 430km/tank which im finding strange.

anyways, the reason for the long reply was i had a few oil problems. i did my valve stem seals, fixed up the pcv and its all running sweet.

also because of the n1 oil pump im using which pumps 25% more oil ive been told, ive made the reducer 4mm as to not flood the turbo.

im going for the greddy ultimate so ill be back with results after im finished with all of my uni work and exams are over (i know ill spend too much time on the car if i get it before!).

What sort of power are you getting out of your beast?

I had my powerfc installed after running my sliding performance high flow on the stock ECU for about a year. It's now putting out 190rwkw on stock boost (7psi), but i cant boost any more at the moment, cause my clutch is slipping!

Time for a new clutch, and then aiming for 230-240kw on slides awesome turbo!

  • 1 month later...

Hey mate, just wondering how its all coming along?

I'll be getting my highflow in a couple of weeks off of slide and this thread is a great read :thumbsup:

Cheers mate

Phil

Edited by PM-R33
Hey mate, just wondering how its all coming along?

I'll be getting my highflow in a couple of weeks off of slide and this thread is a great read :P

Cheers mate

Phil

its going well. comes on boost nice and hard, even with the standard computer.

Interested to see what piggy back your gona put into that car, since its an auto

i can use a pfc if i wanted to champ. dont believe everything you read :mellow:

but i've decided to go with the emanage ultimate (also off slide). its got everything i need + more. i'd probably even go for it if i had a manual.

its going well. comes on boost nice and hard, even with the standard computer.

i can use a pfc if i wanted to champ. dont believe everything you read :mellow:

but i've decided to go with the emanage ultimate (also off slide). its got everything i need + more. i'd probably even go for it if i had a manual.

Hmm i think the emanage provide fuel control and ignitition, but i have read somewhere that the ignigtion control 'retard' is handled by the ecu for shifting.. So i think that you would only benefit from the fuel control.. lol dont qoute me on this but im sure i read it sumhere :P

Hmm i think the emanage provide fuel control and ignitition, but i have read somewhere that the ignigtion control 'retard' is handled by the ecu for shifting.. So i think that you would only benefit from the fuel control.. lol dont qoute me on this but im sure i read it sumhere :P

it is true that the ignition retard is influenced by the auto ecu, but because you have control of ignition through the emanage you can turn that timing back to where its supposed to be at any particular rpm.

this is very interesting because its nearly exactly the same setup as i am going to run..except for the e management (going pfc) and a avcr.

so i am keen to see the results as i am deciding which high flow to go with - the journal like this or the ball bearing., i am not sure that the dramatic increase in price is justified given the comparision of the results.

get it up and keep it posted mate

im trying to get my car ready for the track so i dont think ill be getting an emanage just yet. after the track day ill be saving up for it + a tune. i'll also be getting the sensor so i dont need to run an AFM.

ill MAY be hitting the dyno before the track day to see where my AFRs are at so ill keep you all posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam camp bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
×
×
  • Create New...