Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Need help.

The car is R34-GTS-T, had done this mods when i got it:

HKS cat back systems

HKS air intake systems

HKS intercooler

HKS evc

I'm thinking to get the cpu change, like Apexi Power Fc, Greddy e-manage, or HKS F con S. But my friend told me it's better to get the fuel pressure regulator and fuel pump change.

1. A'm I make a good decision by upgrade the cpu?

2. What would be better for the next upgrade?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14523-next-upgrade-newbies-question/
Share on other sites

1. Front/Dump pipe (you'll be suprised at the midrange power)

2. Switch the boost up to 11-12psi (dont run any higher)

3. Exhaust Cam Gear

4. Fuel pump / Regulator

THEN.. start on the easy things like ECU, etc.

Make sure your pod filter is sealed from the engine heat, and has a decent air duct from the front bar to the pod.

I Agree fully with benm, except for step 4/. fuel reg. and pump should be up to the task. When and if you decide to upgrade the turbo then do these mods.

I have an after market ecu and the gains were very noticable. Still running factory pump and reg. without any signs of leaning out, up top. a/f is approx. 12.2, which sacrifices a couple of rwkw to keep the engine very safe. Car pulls alot harder and feels alot stronger when tuned properly with a ecu.

My 2c

Alan

Guest Master of Disaster

I dont know about 34 fuel pumps, but 33 ones are known for unreliability, which is why so many go straight for the bosch alternatives when powering up.

But yeah, as suggested, do the dump and front pipe first, and if fuel system is up to it, do the ECU.

As far as i know, no one can really proprerly tune an F-con in australia? Its certainly not as well known to tuners as the power FC, which has been tried and tested over and over. The E-manage apparently has some really good featurs that even the FC doesnt have, but again, less people know how to tune it properly.

Id go the Power FC, you cant go wrong. I dont know who would tune it in wollongong, but you can always go to croydon's in sydney. I think they did the tuning on the R34 gt-t project running in HPI mag.

Also, as suggested, apparently its a waste of time having a pod filter if its not partitioned.

Cheers, have fun! :burnout:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...