Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey ppls.

Over the last month or so, a few of us have been conspiring together to bring you a super cool Dyno Chart comparion tool.

Willo, the PHP Guru man that he is, took ideas and suggestions from a few of us and prepared a comparion thingo which allows us to enter our RPM/Speed and power figures from Dyno Pulls and compare them to anyone else we like.

Check it out, post us your graph and let the Chart Bashing begin.

HOOOGE thanks to Willo for donating his time to this worthy cause.

http://sau.garagespank.com/login.php

It's pretty self explanitory, put in EITHER RPM or Speed Verses Power. That's it.

Cheers

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145250-new-sau-dyno-comparison-tool/
Share on other sites

It's starting to get interesting now that more people have entered their graphs.

I'm hoping that in months to come heaps of us enter our runs and we can, as they say in school, compare and contrast.

Thanks heaps Willo. You're a champion of the highest order.

does this take into account automatics, including the fact that full throttle is only achieved when the operator is sure it won't kick back? that makes them hard to compare for low down power

plus they lose more power through the drivetrain..

Just added my last run from September 01... can't wait to see what the difference is now with more boost.

Great work guys...

Perhaps explain how to actually use the system; things like gear ratio and final drive, intial values.

Also; is it possible to have the graph display to be larger?

4.089 for the auto R34 but R33 and R34 manuals are 4.111

Yeah I think comparing to your own previous runs is another great advantage of it.

I don't think torque will ever get on there. We have asked for boost but that is down the track if at all.

The general consensus seems to be boost would be the preference for a second Y-axis scale. I will start looking at it again after I get over all my sh*t being stolen.

The gear ratio, final drive and wheel size parameters are used to auto calculate RPM from speed or speed from RPM. This is a theoretical value only due to real world factors like tyre slip etc. but I'm hoping it is close enough. If you enter values for all these fields and then enter a value in a RPM or speed field it will auto-update the other.

I think I will add a help page as part of the next round of changes as well.

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
    • Just one more post to show the final result and the original "janky" solution for a laugh. Everything feels really tight and no wobbling at all, very pleased 🙂
    • After drying a few days, time to put her back together 
×
×
  • Create New...