Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

there is a good explanation of it in the review of the r34 GTR in car uk magazine, it works as djr81 says. steering the opp way on turn in is meant to make turn in feel sharper, although imo it just makes turn in feel wonky and unsettled. once in the turn, the wheels turn the same way, which is meant to make the car feel more stable mid corner.

Ill try to remember to scan and post up the article soonish. it clears up a lot of ideas about how hicas an attessa work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145273-hicas/page/2/#findComment-2720481
Share on other sites

Maybe the R33 system is more noticeable than the R32's, I suppose it has to work faster to maneuvre the heavier body of a R33 than a R32 at a similar speed.

But in the 6 years in my R32 GTS4, with several track side excursions, driving on the limits of adhesion and beyond I never felt the 4ws doing anything that unerved or scared me. The time when the rear did feel dodgy was when the bushes got really worn(subframe and rear hubs) and then the rear felt like it was steering a bit on its own.

To me it seems unlikely that the Hicas is useless, most of the gear on a Skyline works well and better than a lot of other cars and I can't see Nissan putting it on their cars if it doesn't have a genuine benefit and why they would continue from the R31 to R34s. With my experience in my R32 it seems more likely that the cars that are behaving strangley re Hicas are doing so because the rear components are either very worn or a combination of suspension modifications has modified the HICAS response away from its original design.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145273-hicas/page/2/#findComment-2720953
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

in my r32 gts-4 i came out of a corner and planted it in 4wd and it kicked out like normal and usually the 4wd will strighten the car out but the hicas interfered and flicked the car back harder and harder each way till i slowed down to 20kms then it was fine ...next day it was gone and the car feels 100% better never had the problem sense

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145273-hicas/page/2/#findComment-2742079
Share on other sites

I think in general that people attribute more of the cars handling to the HICAS system than it really justifies. ON my R32 I didn't have a huge problem with it, other than in two particular circumstances:

1. Off camber turn in. In this instance the back end can get a bit light in any case. Having the HICAS add its little bit to the turn in can make it hard to tell the difference between the rear end sliding & just the HICAS working.

2. Mid corner phase change. Not exactly brown underwear stuff, but a bit disconcerting through long corners on the circuit when you are trying to maintain your line.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145273-hicas/page/2/#findComment-2744323
Share on other sites

^^^^^^

I thought hicas only worked above 70 km/h , i hope your not doing 70 down small streets

just the back wheels. lol.

more seriously, especially in the wet it is amazing how you can be lighting it up and it will limit how sideways the car will go. it feels like someone is pushing you straight from the side.

hicas may have a negiative aspect in particular circumstances but as someone who often drives my car pretty hard i say keep it, its more help than hindrance.

yes, i've been in an r33 that felt all funny through corners like the hicas was packing up... it was some bushes at the rear can't remember which ones.

Edited by bobba
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145273-hicas/page/2/#findComment-2747851
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...