Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im looking at getting my car chipped and tuned by my mechanic, i had a good look through sau about the power fc but i am unsure what would be better? i know the chip and laptop tune is cheaper,but would i benefit more from the power fc? are they hard to use or to find a good mechanic to tune one? im hoping one of u guys who use the power fc can help me out!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145309-power-fc-or-piggy-back/
Share on other sites

Yeah, they've discontinued the PFC's for the RB25's. Not sure on the RB25 NEO but I'm almost 100% that they use the same PFC as a R33 RB25. You can still pick them up but I wouldn't leave it too long

They have discontinued the Power FC for some models...... but the R34 is a different part number to the R33

Apexi Power FC 414-AN012 Nissan Skyline ECR33 RB25DET No longer in Production

Apexi Power FC 414-AN008 Nissan Skyline ER34 RB25DET No Longer in Production

Otherwise if you can pick up an PFC they are great!!

Mr Sniper911

Yeh definatly another vote for the FC here!, and there are many many people that can tune them............ just you need to find the right one that tunes them well! As Heslo said Shaun at Boostworx has done a crap load from here, and i'd say a crap load more from people not on here! Seems as the Power FC and Nissan are a quite the combo!

dont say there is no substitute for a Power FC this is just electronics... what is the alternate solution if they do not exist anymore. Alot of people would benefit from that sort of information.

Added bonus is that you can plug the PFC in yourself and drive to the dyno and get a tune.

The PFC isnt obvious, so there is a lot lower chance of a defect than having a SAFC mounted on the dash.

There are other options, but bang for buck and simplicity are in favour of the PFC

R34 ECU has self learning function, hence piggy back (SAFC) is not a good choice as it will return to basic ECU mapping after power cycle.

as the mapping developement will never be the same, a retune is require if the car run out of battery :(

i remeber Andrew is having such a problem with Unichip on his S15

Edited by Maxx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you tried another indicator stalk? Sometimes these go bad and cause issues.
    • They're so beautiful 馃槏
    • Early last week, I became concerned that the car was feeling....slow. Most of my driving is commuting to/from work and there are few opportunities to get up it and convincingly make boost/power. It drives in vacuum almost all the time. But when you do occasionally get an opportunity, and.... it takes a little longer to start making power, and then there's not as much as you'd expect, and then you run out of road anyway and have to bottle out - it can be hard to be convinced that there's something wrong. But by the end of the week I was pretty convinced. Made an effort to get a decent test run. Took bloody forever to come up on boost and when it did it would only make about 50 kPa of pressure. There was no black smoke, no noise of a boost or exhaust leak, no evidence anywhere of an intercooler hose clamp being sloppy enough to let air escape. So.... not that sort of problem. Brainstorming led to thinking that the boost controller's solenoid might have failed in some way. No active boost control would just give wastegate pressure, which I was more or less getting, and the laggy behaviour could just be "normal" shitty boost response from an uncontrolled highflow. But a little extra 3rd party brainstorming led to the thought that the actuator circlip might have jumped off leaving me with a bluetooth wastegate. So, on Friday, off comes the stock heatshield (which is an annoying enough job on its own) to reveal - yup. WG is wide open. And.... it won't come back. It is jammed in the dump. Put the rod back on with a new circlip and tried driving it to get it hot in the hope that the capture was from thermal effects having been blown into the dump when hot and since cooled. Nope. Won't move, even with screwdriver mediated force when hot. Ran out of time to play. Came back to it yesterday. Unbolted the dump. Was lying under it with the dump jammed up against my guts undoing the bottom 2 bolts. Got them most of the way out and gave the dump a serious heave. It didn't noticeably move, but there was a satisfying "plink" noise from up to. Shuffle out and sure enough, gate is now closed. Nevermind that there was still the better part of an hour after that required to put it all back together. f**ken cars.
    • For your application, where you'll be at that 1/2" size or perhaps larger, yeah, excellent. Although not if you need a tight bending radius anywhere, because the corrugated stuff is not anywhere near as flexible as rubber/teflon cored stuff. But for turbo oil lines? No. Too big. They just don't do the corro stuff down at the ~1/4" ID size that you'd want, and if they did the OD of it would probably be a bit too fat for fitting it into the tight spaces available. I use hoses like that all the time for fuel gases (LPG, NG) and liquid fuels (HFO, diesels, waste oils). When we did the London Olympic cauldron, with the 204 individual burners on it, we had miles of the stuff (although a lot of that was teflon core). A bunch of that crap is still cluttering up the workshop, more than 12 years later!
    • Would something like this be an option  https://processhose.com/products/configurable-metal-hoses/1-2-in-t316-stainless-steel-annular-corrugated-configurable-flexible-metal-hose-assembly-with-ends-t304-single-braid-masterflex-af5550.html I'm looking at this for replacing the OEM EGR when installing a aftermarket intake plenum 
  • Create New...