Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

love the Top Secret TE37s, but those fenders are horrible. even if the style is not to my taste (which it's not) at least they quality could have been good, but it's terrible. The engine work also looks like arse, but the idea does have some merit and if it runs well will be quite fast. considering the car was possibly stolen in japan and sold to someone in UAE for $10 or $20K then it's not a bad way to build a cheap fun car.

still such a butchered car by now considering the LHD conversion, the dodgy kit and the engine swap. :(

Haha yeah.

GTR with:

- Maxima dashboard

- Supra Engine

- No 4wd

- Botched widebody disaster

- Cheap and nasty respray

God i hate this more than anything.

Top secret TE37's they may be but considering how dodgy the rest of the car is they're probably resprayed VORK RAVS or regular TE/LE37's at best....

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don’t mind it.. Then again the Toyota motor is a far superior motor to any Nissan motor *waits for Nissan groupies* You all know its true.

There is a Gtst-4 in Thailand with a 2jz, with a butchered 4wd system. Seems to work..

I don’t mind it.. Then again the Toyota motor is a far superior motor to any Nissan motor *waits for Nissan groupies* You all know its true.

There is a Gtst-4 in Thailand with a 2jz, with a butchered 4wd system. Seems to work..

picsorban

where can i find more info on this?

It was on a google search.

I was searching things like 2jz skyline conversion, 2jz R32 conversion, 2jz R32 engine mounts ect. The link will be a Thailand performance forum

The idea is Awesome. But I agree that its a shit idea to ruin a AWD car just to fit a FAR SUPERIOR ENGINE They should have left the Nissan engine if they couldn't be bothered getting the AWD to work. That said, any RWD Nissan deserves a 2JZ or even a 1JZ.

T060809A-5693.jpg

12.5 @ 115mph, stock ECU, stock turbos stock auto.

BTW anyone wanting to fit a 2JZ with stock turbos in a Nissan PM me. I have a special dump and front pipe that crosses under the engine and re routes to the passenger side. It has good ground clearance. I am upgrading to a single turbo and won't need it. (top dump section has since been HPC coated in silver)

post-2657-1164964241.jpg

post-2657-1164964611.jpg

Edited by DennisRB30

omg just chill, if the owner wanted a 2jz, that fine. i like the wide body kit. i dont see nothing wrong with it.

maybe he wanted the r34gtr shell but doesnt like the rb26 or 4wd, ever herd off bog? most 4wd cars suffers that.

and who the f**k says "poorly executed", that thing pull 600+rwhp untuned wtf.

who gives a f**k what u think all think of the car. toyota make dam good engines. and just when did modifying your car involes someones else opinion. if he wanted the 2jz good on him.

thats a great conversion if they retained the 4wd, and how do u guys know they havent? i dont think fitting the gtr sump upto the 2jz would be that hard with an adaptor plate same as they do to rb30s. i'd go a 2jz over rb26 anyday of the year :P why have a built motor for 600hp+ when u can run stock internals and do it easy :P checkout the yank supraforums and u guys will start to realise the 2jz is alot stronger than the 26's in holding big power. ive got a jun 2.7L rb26 so dont think im against 26s at all i just know the money i spent i could of got a stock 2jz and made the same power with a monster turbo and 1/4 of the $$$.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...