Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys/Girls

need help with identifying the circled part so I can order it from Nissan or somewhere.

car has a high/hunting idle which it developed after I changed the plugs and re-connected everything back up.

I have checked and re-checked everything, CO contact cleaner sprayed connectors/electrical plugs all after my Consult display said 3 sensors weren't happy (I now have no sensor faults and the engine dash icon is off) but the idle problem is still there.

I'm hoping in replacing this part my idle problem will cease. I have searched but everything idle thread is turbo related. It's either this or taking it to an import workshop.

thanks

Reggie.

post-1904-1165229519.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145918-part-id-help/
Share on other sites

Eug, yeah I took the pic with that hose removed for a better view of the part i'm talking about.

Woolls, you sure mate? it's really loose in it's cavity in the head. the hose is fine, it's just the connector or valve, whatever it is.

anyone else can confirm it being the PCV valve?

will call nissan tomorrow.

thanks all

Reggie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145918-part-id-help/#findComment-2725951
Share on other sites

100% man, just replaced mine a few weeks ago, 30 bucks I think. :)

Eug, yeah I took the pic with that hose removed for a better view of the part i'm talking about.

Woolls, you sure mate? it's really loose in it's cavity in the head. the hose is fine, it's just the connector or valve, whatever it is.

anyone else can confirm it being the PCV valve?

will call nissan tomorrow.

thanks all

Reggie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/145918-part-id-help/#findComment-2726443
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...