Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day all,

I just wanted to know what everyone thinks about the reliability of Pivot's speedmeter. I had one installed recently and on my second attempt on the M4, my 0-100 figure was 6.00 sec. I was pleased with this because I had the silencer on my muffler fitted in.

The times varied from between 6 sec and 6.3.:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/
Share on other sites

well standard is 6.2 for 33 with approx 140rwkw. Id say add exhaust and filter and boost and youd be pushing 160rwkw, and mid 5seconds to 100? Go a FMIC and some sort of management for 190+rwkw, and id say low 5seconds to high 4 seconds 0-100.

does this sound right?

Guilt toy, 4.77 is pretty quick, you must have 200+kw at the wheels? The only thing is, how do you get the traction to pull a 4.77 0-100? what tyres you got, and how did you launch?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-296975
Share on other sites

yeah dude, i doubt 3.4 sec as well... i would say thats impossible on street tyres!! i dont think any RWD street car will be able to crack the low 4 seconds, apart from these "street" cars in japan running Nittos and 10sec qtrs!

I remember i test done with propper equipment on Kingsley Heads GTR 32, big single conversion, and i think he was only just in the high 3sec to 100 bracket. BIG power and RWD on street=inability to do exceptional 0-100's!! The power becomes a problem rathere than an aid in low gears.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297178
Share on other sites

250rwkw is a heap of power, and if you could get it down you'd probably do 3.4secs! But no way espec with the shit 235's you mention!

when i went from 160 to 200kw i could no longer just plant it in 1st due to traction breaking, wheras before i could let 1st wind right out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297188
Share on other sites

dumb question but how does it measure the distance ?

If you sat their and ripped a burnout (tyres spinning faster than what your car could move) it would give you a 'really' quick 0-100m time wouldnt it ?

/end dum question.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297247
Share on other sites

Originally posted by toby19

pivot speedmeter measures 0-100 kph, 0-200 kph, 0-300 kph and 0-400 metres. To make it more clear, an olympic runner does about 9-10 sec for the 100 m sprint. A 6 sec skyline (0-100m) wouldn't be faster than a human by only 3-4 sec to 100 m would it.

LOL - I'm pretty sure they are talking about 0-100 k/ph, not 0-100m :)

J

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297616
Share on other sites

Jay,

Your posy doesn't make sense. Toby is the one started this thread which is about the reading he took from his pivot speedmeter.

Toby,

One way to find out whether you are in fact measuring 0-100kmh is to set the meter and go for a run sitting at 60kmh. You can do this as you are cruising and don't have to do it from stand still.If it beeps and gives you a reading it is clear that the reading is for 0-100m not 0-100kmh. You can try the same for 0-200, 0-300 and 0-400. I am sure you will find that all the readings are for distance not for speed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297640
Share on other sites

A cheetah would be faster than our beloved skylines over a sprint of 100meters. Basically having to move a mass of 1.5 ton and not being able to put all the power to the ground from stand still (read traction) hass all to do with it.

Obviously as the distance is increased there is no comparison.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297661
Share on other sites

With 180rwkw (about 2 years ago), I clocked off about 5.2 secs with a g-tech... 206rwkw and I managed a 4.9...

Much faster than that and you're pushing shit uphill with only two wheels driving, as you can only put down so much power in first and second...

Try a 100-200 time estimate if you want an indication of a cars power :)

matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/14631-0-100/#findComment-297994
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...