Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

T517Z's 2860R HKSGT2530

At 95km/h, 85kw, the 2860R's 95kw 90kw

At 112km/h, 105kw compared to 140kw 120kw

At 128km/h, 155kw compared to 240kw 200kw

At 145km/h, 255kw compared to 305kw 313kw

At 160km/h, 330kw compared to 325kw 315kw

At 178km/h, 360kw compared to 350kw 355kw

At 194km/h, 365kw compared to 358kw 372kw

I have no idea what boost or mods the other GTR's had..

I have

Tomei 260 9.15 cams

87mm pistons

1mm oversize valves

chinese manifolds

ARC twin entry intercooler

twin 3" exhaust

Apexi pods

PFC

22psi

AFR 11.2

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

T517Z's 2860R HKSGT2530

At 95km/h, 85kw, the 2860R's 95kw 90kw

At 112km/h, 105kw compared to 140kw 120kw

At 128km/h, 155kw compared to 240kw 200kw

At 145km/h, 255kw compared to 305kw 313kw

At 160km/h, 330kw compared to 325kw 315kw

At 178km/h, 360kw compared to 350kw 355kw

At 194km/h, 365kw compared to 358kw 372kw

I have no idea what boost or mods the other GTR's had..

I have

Tomei 260 9.15 cams

87mm pistons

1mm oversize valves

chinese manifolds

ARC twin entry intercooler

twin 3" exhaust

Apexi pods

PFC

22psi

AFR 11.2

BOOSTD, thats very interesting, the 2530's are very similar to the 2860R's, looks like the 2860R's still have more down low till about 178km/h, the 2530's have more top end..

I have the same cams, same pistons, standard valves, standard manifolds, trust intercooler (76mm thick), 3.5'' HKS Hiper exhaust, same pods, but both were done at 20psi boost. Not sure on AFR, as graph has power and boost level....

Can't wait to see how you go with the 2860R's....

Also don't forget each dyno is different, and mine wasn't done in 'shoot-out' mode...

ok sweet, I'll do a run at 20psi aswell. I will be using the same dyno in shootout mode. I have changed back to the standards manifolds however match ported to the turbo's as they were a good center meter out. Chansing average power rather than top end, my previous setup was ever so slightly laggy for my liking.

JAGR33 if im reading that right it 2530s make more power by 145kms then not much and back up again.Because his graph has a dip in it at that point(wheelspin maybe) anyway both come alot nicer then the T517z by the look of it.

JAGR33 if im reading that right it 2530s make more power by 145kms then not much and back up again.Because his graph has a dip in it at that point(wheelspin maybe) anyway both come alot nicer then the T517z by the look of it.

Yeah your right, although at 160km/h the 2560R's are making more power....

BOOSTD, if the 2530's were a little laggy for your liking, I can assure you you will like the response of the 2860R's....

Either way, they are much more responsive than T517Z's.... Bush bearing versus dual ball bearing....

This car has -5s and the tune has more left in it because the boost controller was playing up.

Now has better controller and large injectors on the way so we can crank more boost into it.

For turbos not much over 1k each their hard to beat.358rwkw

This car has -5s and the tune has more left in it because the boost controller was playing up.

Now has better controller and large injectors on the way so we can crank more boost into it.

For turbos not much over 1k each their hard to beat.358rwkw

thats unreal man cant wait to see what these make with more power make sure ya post dyno results....

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok, my 2860-5's are on. In forth it makes 15psi at 4200rpm. which is a few hundred rpm at least under my 2530's. I have only run 1.4 bar so far. I'll change my plugs and run 1.75 for a comparision run against my 380rwkw HKS GT2530's

Ok, my 2860-5's are on. In forth it makes 15psi at 4200rpm. which is a few hundred rpm at least under my 2530's. I have only run 1.4 bar so far. I'll change my plugs and run 1.75 for a comparision run against my 380rwkw HKS GT2530's

they look like unreal turbos.im so glad i picked them over the gt-ss...

im still waiting for mine to turn up :thumbsup: but well worth the wait aye

This car has -5s and the tune has more left in it because the boost controller was playing up.

Now has better controller and large injectors on the way so we can crank more boost into it.

For turbos not much over 1k each their hard to beat.358rwkw

hey nib what were the specs for this car ?

i have so far amassed :

gt2860-5 x2

sard 700cc inj

nismo fuel pump

greddy dump/front in one (the one with LONG split pipe)

nismo cat /hks catback

powerfc djetro

still debating tho

tomei exhaust manifolds

pon cams

adjustable cam gears

if anyone has any thoughts on if these extras will be worth the cost I would love to hear

sorry for mini hijack

Edited by arkon
hey nib what were the specs for this car ?

i have so far amassed :

gt2860-5 x2

sard 700cc inj

nismo fuel pump

greddy dump/front in one (the one with LONG split pipe)

nismo cat /hks catback

powerfc djetro

still debating tho

tomei exhaust manifolds

pon cams

adjustable cam gears

if anyone has any thoughts on if these extras will be worth the cost I would love to hear

sorry for mini hijack

cam gears and cams are a must, stock manifolds will be fine....

Car has Stock ported exhaust manifolds,Arias Pistons,Eagle rods,N1 oil pump,260 Tomei Poncams + gears, stock head,Stock GTR intake manifold with single throttle kit,600cc injectors and V400 Wolf ECU.

Big injectors and full tune coming when we open at Topracing after our Xmas break.

Car has Stock ported exhaust manifolds,Arias Pistons,Eagle rods,N1 oil pump,260 Tomei Poncams + gears, stock head,Stock GTR intake manifold with single throttle kit,600cc injectors and V400 Wolf ECU.

Big injectors and full tune coming when we open at Topracing after our Xmas break.

sounds like quiet the collection there mate,how much power ya aiming 4

Thought I'd comment,

this is my old motor with 2530's and low boost with a poor cat, same sort of mods as you guys minus the computer still using the stock one modified and no cam gears

Old engine hks 2530's

Fresh motor and some extra goodies should see over 500rwhp will be on the dyno in the next month hopefully

Edited by monga
Thought I'd comment,

this is my old motor with 2530's and low boost with a poor cat, same sort of mods as you guys minus the computer still using the stock one modified and no cam gears

Old engine hks 2530's

Fresh motor and some extra goodies should see over 500rwhp will be on the dyno in the next month hopefully

thats nice power...

let us no when ya tune it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...