Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

go the gt2860r ike

I assume you mean gt2860r-5 what are the gt2860r-7's like slightly less hp but more response??

yeah the price difference would be a set of hks dump pipes apparently the actuators on the gt-ss are 50%

stronger according to the blurb. Do the garretts have the same actuators just for better boost control that is

Does anyone know if you have to pay duty on stuff from overseas, maybe better to haggle locally for those garrets but which ones.

all da best

  • Replies 157
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

^^^^^^^^any more news on ya power levels.or ya still looking for gearbox mate?

also what did yo do to modify the oil returns,just re-drill the whole to fit.????

I removed all the broken teeth from my box and have been driving -around with no 3rd. Looks like I have an OS box lined up.

I have recieved my FC-Datalogic so been doing some tunning. No idea on power levels, however boost response is insane and dataloging indicates faster accel between 1st and second with 1.4bar.

good response that unreal hope to be installing mine today. but still have other things to do so sadly no start up..

so sounds like your happy with the turbos then

thanks boostd,yeh i thought thats what i had to do(elongate)holes.

as i dont have hks turbos b4,will i need to change the part your talking about.also some said in another thread i was reading,that oil restrictors will need to be put in place with ball bearing turbos. something about seals blowing otherwise?

thanks boostd,yeh i thought thats what i had to do(elongate)holes.

as i dont have hks turbos b4,will i need to change the part your talking about.also some said in another thread i was reading,that oil restrictors will need to be put in place with ball bearing turbos. something about seals blowing otherwise?

Yes this is interesting. I posted a question about restrictors many months ago and got varied results on the answers.. What I can tell you though is that I replaced std GTR turbos with Garrett 2860R (the 707160-7's) and went racing.. 5 laps into it I had blown the oil seal on the front turbo... Whether this was a symptom of another fault - or whether this was due simply to high oil pressure I am not sure..

On the Garrett Website under the FAQ though, it does mention the 'best' oil pressure to have for Ball-Bearing types:

http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...r/faqs.html#t16

It would be good to be able to measure or regulate the pressure at the turbos - but I don't want to simply fit a restrictor and then under supply them...

Anyone know the real answer to this?

BB turbs generally need half the oil supply of a bush type turbo, so a restrictor would be recommended if changing to a BB turbo.

Some companies would sell restrictors for oil lines, can't think of any off the top of my head.

On that note, can anyone elaborate:

R34 GTR BB turbos would have to have a restrictor or smaller oil inlet hole?

I remember my GT30 had an internal oil restrictor on the cartridge.

I would assume other Garrett turbos would be the same... i didnt blow a seal on my single...

and not with gt-ss, far as im aware we have not added any restrictor either

thats good to hear,cause ill be putting my turbos on this week i hope. but if anyone has the 2860r on there car and has put some sort of oil restrictor in could please advice us,cheers

UPDATE: I decided to purchase a new set of Garrett 2860R -5 and managed to pull a 274kw @ 16psi.

I was hoping to pull 300kw...Car has cat back exhaust, front pipes, dump pipes, Power FC, Gizmo Boost Controller and Bosch 040 Fuel Pump.

Oh Well.........I think a TRUST T78 is on the list now *S*

UPDATE: I decided to purchase a new set of Garrett 2860R -5 and managed to pull a 274kw @ 16psi.

I was hoping to pull 300kw...Car has cat back exhaust, front pipes, dump pipes, Power FC, Gizmo Boost Controller and Bosch 040 Fuel Pump.

Oh Well.........I think a TRUST T78 is on the list now *S*

What size injectors are you using Gavin

UPDATE: I decided to purchase a new set of Garrett 2860R -5 and managed to pull a 274kw @ 16psi.

I was hoping to pull 300kw...Car has cat back exhaust, front pipes, dump pipes, Power FC, Gizmo Boost Controller and Bosch 040 Fuel Pump.

Great news JUN....Cam gears would help you get a bit more and earlier, high flow or *cough* spec R cat would help too. Intake? Pods?? I have the -5's and they get it done...

we just put the garret - 5 on our car, havnt got it dyno'd yet but just pulls from 3500 all the way up to 8.

feels about 300kw or so. but until we get it dyno'd and a good computer who knows

cheers

Nick, I have the std 440cc injectors in the car atm.

Do you think a replacement cat would help? any good recommendations on where to get one?

I have 2 x Pod Filters...unsure of brand.

Not sure of which cam gears to get....leaning towards Tomei ones over the HKS ones.

Edited by JUN R33
Nick, I have the std 440cc injectors in the car atm.

Do you think a replacement cat would help? any good recommendations on where to get one?

I have 2 x Pod Filters...unsure of brand.

Not sure of which cam gears to get....leaning towards Tomei ones over the HKS ones.

If you are using factory injectors then 270+ kw at 16psi is impressive.

Without knowing the rest of the specifics about your setup, fit some larger injectors and up the boost and you will hit 300 without much trouble.

If you dont have cams already, Tomei sells a bundle with their Type B poncams and cam gears at a pretty decent price.

Tomei and HKS cam gears are much of a muchness now, the new HKS design is far improved over the old ones which had a bad tendancy to wear around the teeth.

Yep....Std 440cc injectors but, I just expected more then 270+ *S*

The car is pretty much standard except for the items I mentioned earlier.

My tuner said the car did make 300kw but, it wasnt at an acceptable level of tune....was tuned safe and made the 274 run.

I'd rather be safe then sorry.

I have a dyno sheet which I hope to have up by tomorrow for all to look at.

LOL you have a Power FC take the car for a run and have a look at what the duty cycle hits and then you will know what Blitz means. Its common knowlegde that stock fuels system runs out of puff around 260-270kws.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...