Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20933070-1702,00.html

surprise, surprise...

for the lazy people who don't want to click a link

_______________________________________________________________

By Rhys Haynes

December 15, 2006 06:05pm

Article from: AAPFont size: + -

Send this article: Print Email

SEVEN Network's Today Tonight program has been given a slap on the wrist by the media authority after knowingly reporting incorrect facts about a Telstra staff conference on Lindeman Island.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) found that Today Tonight breached the Commercial Television Industry Code of Practice 2004 three times in the space of a month over two separate Telstra stories.

ACMA said Today Tonight breached clause 4.3.1 by failing to "represent viewpoints fairly'' when it broadcast a story about Telstra's billing systems on September 13, 2005.

Telstra said it had attempted to contact the program before the show aired, but it was not given an opportunity to respond until just hours before the broadcast.

"It also failed to provide sufficient details of the story to permit a meaningful response,'' Telstra said.

ACMA also found that Today Tonight breached the same clause in a program on October 12, 2005, when it aired a follow-up story to a September 26 broadcast of a Telstra event on Lindeman Island for 200 senior staff and some of their partners.

"The (original) story broadcast incorrect facts about the size and cost of the event,'' Telstra said.

"Two weeks later, on October 12, 2005, the program repeated claims about the size and cost of the event, this time knowing them to be incorrect.''

ACMA found that Today Tonight breached the clause twice on October 12 by failing to present factual material accurately and by not promptly remedying that failure.

The clause includes that the television broadcaster presents factual material accurately, represents viewpoints fairly and makes reasonable efforts to correct significant errors of fact.

The Seven Network told ACMA it would use the breach as an example in staff training, and report on this investigation to the company's board.

Seven today said it would be "taking the ACMA report seriously'' and acknowledged its duty to be fair and accurate "as much as humanly possible''.

"Today Tonight got a lot more right in the story than Telstra claims today,'' spokesman Simon Francis said.

''... We are happy to correct any errors of fact.''

ACMA today said it would take no further action.

The authority added that it was "concerned'' about the number of recent complaints to it relating to potential breaches of the code by news and current affairs programs.

"The authority will be closely monitoring this trend, including whether it raises issues for consideration in the forthcoming review of the code, expected to commence by mid-2007,'' it said

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nope, still smaller rear, put on the 4inch exhaust and picked up power everywhere, ended up just shy of 800rwhp.   Didn't seem to be hitting any walls either, so perhaps could have pushed for more but all maybes and the fish that got away etc etc. 
    • Races cars don't care for VIN either...
    • This could be sold and shipped to the US for many gold pieces. RMS has no say in that. Ask various Western Sydney inhabitants how it works.
    • Ha ha ha, mine loves to spend, all on the dogs (they're our kids, and her spending would likely rival that of some people raising children!) the only benefit is, her spending is tax deductible as she runs a business in the dog industry 😛 The above all means she can spend race car budget quicker than I can. 😛 That and a lot of the things I want are very expensive, and I can be a bit "you want how much for that?!" And at other times overly impulsive. Or I start the w days of research, get to day 1.5 and get really annoyed that no one will advertise actual specifics and it's just marketting BS and I go "well, now I don't want anything to do with that now!" Also I hate paying lots of money for something I can make from $50 in materials. Then I get the shits halfway through making things and wonder why others who just buy parts have more fun... 😛  
    • Their 240Z with the RB26 would be a real nice thing to have in a garage to come out for an occasional weekend cruise It's such a cool thing in so many ways Sadly, we have a blue 240Z shell that I walk past every day, just sitting outside a shed at work, it has been slowly disintegrating and falling apart into the ground for the last few years, the owner cannot be found, and I am unable to "claim it" I've been told by work and the RMS, the rust in the body is excessive though, and it has had most of the salvageable stuff, like panels, trim and switch gear stripped off it over the last year or two, work keeps threatening to put it in one of our metal scrap bins, I wish they did though, as it makes Mark sad walking past it  
×
×
  • Create New...