Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Paul;

My comment about the F-CON being used in the top GTRs in the world was in response to a previous comment that needed justification. I totally agree that it has zero relevance to this case.

"any ecu can make a car go fast, its how well its tuned and of course additional features it has"

Little bit contradictory...

True any ECU can be made to tune a car so it's fast... but as you just said: how well it's tuned and the features. Can't tune a ECU well when it just doesn't have the features nor does it have the tunability.

SAFCII is good; but not for the power you're talking about 250rwkw? Don't think so...

Finally, back on the E-Manage topic:

If you do some research you will find that many SAU people have had major problems with just the INSTALLATION of the E-Manage let alone using it. 666DAN will be able to back me up on this. You simply cannot just plug it in an make it work. I think there was a lot of DIY involved in order to make it work stably.

MAP capabilities? Using the Profec B? Hmmm.... and just take a look at N I B's comment.

F-CON, hasn't skipped a beat~

why do you think the safc cant get to 250rwkw? all it does it bend the afm signal. sure its a comprimise but all of the solutions are comprimises.

i dont see why a particular ecu would be limited to a power level, its just ign and inj values. i see no reason why the safc could not get a customer to 250rwkw. it will be a more tedious to do the initial tune as youll get to a point where it will advance the timing too much and induce detonation, but you should be able to get 250rwkw.

SAFC is a signal bender only with all fuel tuning changes have an affect on timing with no means to sort this problem.If you lean out an SAFC it tells the ECU its under less load so it moves the ECU into a lower load zone delivering less fuel but also more timing often leading to detonation.

SAFCs place in the food chain is basic modded cars only.

As far as I know SAFC is a fuel controller only (+/- 16 points) along a preset RPM range.

Problems:

1) No ignition changes

2) No compensation for bigger injectors (stock ECUs won't even work with bigger injectors)

3) What N I B said...

of course the safc wont work with bigger injectors

the user doesnt need to change injectors

it will move the ign timing around as the afm signal it bent

as the load is moved around, so to are the ign/inj load points

yeah Paul is correct from my exp.

I have run them had not real issues...

max'n out injectors is mod/tune dependant - mine were 95% at 260rwkw...with an EMANAGE...but thats with a better fuel pump...not std fuel pressure.

The emange will run to 280 cos I have done it...But I got a much better tune form the PFC.

I have also ran the emanage and the SAFC in my FTO...low power app with EXACTLY the same dyno after....

Every1 else has posted pros and cons...

Get a PFC or Haltech as suggested.

With the emanage blue... the options all add up, e.g. the software (unless your tuner already has it), the injector harness, etc. You should check out the emanage ultimate if you're looking at going this road.

  • 2 months later...

The Ultimate seem like a good buy with all the harness and support tool provided. Anyway it is nice to be able to fiddle with the software and tuning by yourself, but tuning it wrong is high which let to my friend blowing up his engine on the same day he dyno then when home to alter the setting himself. Most piggy back & ECU should be tune on the dyno then leave it once it's done. I will probably go for an FCon SZ or a 2nd FCON Vpro depending on availability plus i have a tuner who drives a GTT with Vpro too. We are always chasing for power, so buy something that do not limit ur goal for many year to come since the ECU is the brain for everything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Appreciate the feedback. It is street car, but not a daily. Last week I got a quote from a good exhaust shop for a decat, one which is bolt-on, bolt-off to be easily replaceable. I got quoted for around €150. I usually do push the motor, but I wasn't in this case to make sure that no damage is done until I get the cat sorted. I think it's best to also ask the exhaust shop for the other option and see what they can do. If (big if) I were to decat though, would it be best to tune the car or would the stock ECU handle it? As far as I know, the stock ECU is not tunable and that would require additional purchases.
    • As above, definitely bash it or get it replaced with a high flow unit.
    • get some flares on them, or wider guards haha
    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
×
×
  • Create New...