Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The general power output figure for an rb20det is 215hp, but I'm assuming that is the silvertop ECCS.

I am looking at putting a redtop NICS engine into an r30 with a dr30 brake upgrade, I need to know whether it exceeds the FJ20det output or not for engineering info.

The FJ20det is 190hp and the RB20det is 215, the redtop rb20det has to be inbetween there somewhere within reason, I need to know what it is.

Thanks,

Rick.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147909-redtop-nics-power-output/
Share on other sites

I believe the Nics is around 135kw compared to a silvertop 160kw.

So the Nics has a little bit less power than a FJ20.

Ahahaha, that's both good and bad to hear... :)

Well it's a good thing considering this will be the very first turbo car I've ever driven let alone had. Because, I probably shouldn't have too much power.

At the same time that makes it kinda annoying...

What sort of kw rating does the FJ put out?

And what is the NICS horsepower rating?

Cheers!

Rick.

It's gonna set me back bugger all and I don't have enough money to do otherwise so I'm content with the idea. Put it this way, regular mr30 = 85rwhp, I think. NICS = 150rwhp in an r30 with an exhaust (I'm pretty sure on that) That jump in power alone is a fair bit and should be enough for me to get the car to do whatever I need to do with it.

Also the turbo 2-door R31's have the NICS engine and weigh 1350kg I believe whereas MR30's weigh 1150kg's, so that should allow for some more power access.

Edited by Blue Dynamite

Yes, but the NICS are plagued with electrical problems... most of the red-top RB20's are.

They werent the latest and greatest and a brand new motor design which was much improved/ironed out with the silver top, which are far more reliable.

You might be lucky, you might not have a problem... but it potentially might be a cheap motor that ends up costing you much more than you expected

Yes, but the NICS are plagued with electrical problems... most of the red-top RB20's are.

They werent the latest and greatest and a brand new motor design which was much improved/ironed out with the silver top, which are far more reliable.

You might be lucky, you might not have a problem... but it potentially might be a cheap motor that ends up costing you much more than you expected

Good point, but at least for the time being, this is all I can afford. I've seen it running and everything 'appears' to be in well running order, so hopefully I am lucky.

Cheers.

Rick.

I'd think very hard before using that engine . People here are trying to stop you painting yourself into a corner with the early R31 spec RB20DET . It would make more sense to save a bit longer and buy an engine that not only works better everywhere , is easier to get parts for and comes standard with better manifolding/turbocharger and engine control electrics . Just to get the non std engine and gearbox into an R30 is going to take a bit of effort and money so why go with a known problem child .

Cheers A .

I'd think very hard before using that engine . People here are trying to stop you painting yourself into a corner with the early R31 spec RB20DET . It would make more sense to save a bit longer and buy an engine that not only works better everywhere , is easier to get parts for and comes standard with better manifolding/turbocharger and engine control electrics . Just to get the non std engine and gearbox into an R30 is going to take a bit of effort and money so why go with a known problem child .

Cheers A .

A) because I'm getting it for $500 with help in instalation

B) because the engine is being taken out of a 240z and all if any adaption process's should already be done (I'm told the only real adaption is with the gearbox). As for gearbox mounts I'm using a standard MR30 gearbox, however it's in good condition and Bazz from Datsport said it wont have a problem so long as I use decent gearoil in it.

C) I only really need it to last me a year anyway.

D) The body of my project car is delapidated and thus putting a $2000 engine/gearbox into it wouldn't make much sense to me.

D2) Maybe when I get it complied with the weak NICS engine, I give it a decent paint job (going with a can fixup for now), have learned how to drive with a dodgey turbo engine; then upgrading to a silvertop would be a better idea.

Call me ignorant and arrogant and I guess I am taking a chance on this engine holding up for a year, but I think I blew my dailys engine the other day and god knows I couldn't be bothered rebuilding another one for its tainted wishbones, dead front shocks, dead clutch and broken windows at 300-500+ effort for the power of an L24.

I think I'd just find a usable injected L28 and plonk it in . Spending on dying cars is not real good in my book . You're probably better off trying to find another acceptable MR30 and buying one cheaply .

Cheers .

And so says the latest deserter from the classic brigade :)

Some of us still believe in old vs newer, to be better.

Merry Xmas & happy new year A, guess we will catch up again in the new year.

Cheers, D

Red top NICCS were rated @ 142Kw @ 6200 but all the tests done on them in Oz say they're stuffed over 5000 rpm so I guess you would be looking at a realistic figure of about 120/130.

Cheers, D

Yep thats due to the standard turbo, runs out of puff just after 5000rpm on stock boost (8-9psi) and drops to around 5psi at 7000rpm, thats why you see most of them run a RB25 T3 these days.

The Zed guys in the states had the same problem with the T03 on the L28ET. As it neared closer to the red line the further the boost bled off, so nearly all quick Zeds use an EBC to overcome the problem.

Cheers, D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
    • I'm almost at a point where I feel like changing the alternator. Need to check the stuff you mentioned first though.
×
×
  • Create New...