Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking at lowering my spring rates both front/rear by 2kg/mm (manufacturer specifies acceptable range +/- 2kg/mm for my model)

Currently have "firm" rates:

Front 10kg/mm with free length of 175mm (Stroke 98mm)

Rear 8kg/mm with free length of 200mm (Stroke 111mm)

Now if I were to change to 8kg front and 6kg rear can I just use the longer rear spring in the front and lower the spring perch to compensate for height difference (final ride height won't matter as have 2 way height adjust). Just wondering if this will cause issues, wouldn't think so as springsare linear in rate.

Seeing if I can just buy x1 pair of springs?

thanks

Edited by PT

200mm free height spring is fine in the front. If you have preload and base height adjustment, that is more than enough to make the height right. And then a new pair of 200mm free height 6kg/mm in the rear.

So yes, you can just buy 1 pair of springs

  • 1 month later...

OK new springs have arrived and I have swapped them over and adjusted preload on them, not fitted to car as it's at the workshop getting other stuff done.

Main concern is the coilovers hitting the bump stops due to lighter spring rates. I have done rough calculations to try to offset this, I know it's not "exaclty" like this in real world as other factors occur but...

FRONT: factory weight=690kg, divide by two=345kg per side (L and R)

10kg/mm spring will compress ~34mm

8kg/mm spring will compress ~43mm

Difference ~9mm, so I have increased preload by 9mm over original set up (I have then taken into account I am using a longer spring too)

REAR: factory weight=550kg, therefore ~275kg per side

8kg/mm spring will compress ~34mm

6kg/mm spring will compress ~45mm

Difference ~11mm, so have increased preload by 11mm compared to before (BUT I hace a helper spring too 1.9kg/mm with 80mm free length=too hard to factor in)

Long winded post yes, plenty of crap figures/numbers yes, but have I gone about this in the right way???

Should or do I need to trim the bump stops, they are 2-3" long

Edited by PT

How much you trim the bump stops depends on the height you have the car set to. Whether or not it reaches the bumpstops depends on height, shock rates, where you're driving etc.

Increasing preload as you have done will raise the car, this may bother you.

How much the strut compresses also depends on the shock. A high pressure monotube shock will compress less than a low pressure twin tube shock because of the gas pressure inside acting as a spring.

Your rear struts have helper springs so that effectively gives bugger all preload when they are uncrushed. With the weight of the car down, the helper spring completely crushes so they dont have an effect on how the main spring behaves.

Edited by salad

yeah they have 2 way height adjustment so I can alter final ride height independently from the spring perch, hence preload affecting height can be negated.

they are a twin tube (Tein)

surprisingly despite the helper spring there the main spring has now got 5mm of preload on it by rasing the spring perch 11mm total

I'll wait til fitted before cutting the bumpstops in that case.

You haven't considered the dynamic weight transfer when cornering/braking/accelerating in your calculation :yes:

The strut will now compress further when cornering with the same load even if you increase the pre load to compensate for the difference in static loading.

If you are really concerned you can increase the pre load on the spring to the point where the weight of the car is only compressing it by a small amount (say 10-15mm either end) and adjust the height via the base adjustment in order to maximize travel.

Try this;

This is how much much to trim off a Group Buy front bump stop, shown next to a standard Skyline front bump stop. The orange line is for standard height, the red line is for ~350 mm centre of wheel to guard and the yellow line is for ~330 mm centre of wheel to guard.

Bump_Stop_Comparison_With_Heights_Small.jpg

:miner: cheers :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...