Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

very nice increase, quick question though how come the blue torque line ends earlier then the red. are the graphs overlaid correctly ?

simple...one run was 10-12 km/h faster than the other..i.e. revved a little higher/longer

Jim is one of the country's most skilled and reputable dyno operators, used by leading teams in all forms of motorsport.

again i must stress there is no bullsh1t going on here.

  • 4 weeks later...

i see. so weve gne from what seems to be "big" cams to the bigest ones that thomas has to offer.

with these very suprising results.

very nice work but. im still so impressed.

so generaly speaking, if your going to run decent boost go for the big ones eah?

i knew i was soft buying type b 260's. but that was almost 3 years ago :S

Dont be confused between a 300kw gain in total, its just that the power comes on earlier(and more)to the point that it now makes boost(and power) where it didnt before, excellent result must be happy as a pig in s#$t. Whats the driving difference like?

Dont be confused between a 300kw gain in total, its just that the power comes on earlier(and more)to the point that it now makes boost(and power) where it didnt before, excellent result must be happy as a pig in s#$t. Whats the driving difference like?

has made a huge difference on the road...it has really livened up the midrange and made the car more streetable.

"thats if 550 AWKW can ever be described as streetable"

This goes against convential thinking...but...

an incorrectly matched cam and turbo package can make or break a build.

this was a laggy set-up till slightly bigger camshafts were installed

around 300 more KW at 150kph...wow

Those waving lines in the top are just due to big power,Wheelspin and IRS moving on the dyno

car cannot be dynod in 2 gears look at the speed they are doing and also Gearing on the dyno will only give u 10-20 hp difference not 300kw

Yes shoot8 is more load better for high hp

and great power gain mate

Ps its a Street car

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 馃榿
    • The factory oil pressure sender is no longer in the car that's what is confusing me. In the Taarks adapter I have an aftermarket Bosch style pressure/temp sender and the factory temp sender only. Oil pressure is perfect. Where does the factory oil temp sender go to if there were never any gauges? Why was it there from the factory?
  • Create New...