Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

very nice increase, quick question though how come the blue torque line ends earlier then the red. are the graphs overlaid correctly ?

simple...one run was 10-12 km/h faster than the other..i.e. revved a little higher/longer

Jim is one of the country's most skilled and reputable dyno operators, used by leading teams in all forms of motorsport.

again i must stress there is no bullsh1t going on here.

  • 4 weeks later...

i see. so weve gne from what seems to be "big" cams to the bigest ones that thomas has to offer.

with these very suprising results.

very nice work but. im still so impressed.

so generaly speaking, if your going to run decent boost go for the big ones eah?

i knew i was soft buying type b 260's. but that was almost 3 years ago :S

Dont be confused between a 300kw gain in total, its just that the power comes on earlier(and more)to the point that it now makes boost(and power) where it didnt before, excellent result must be happy as a pig in s#$t. Whats the driving difference like?

Dont be confused between a 300kw gain in total, its just that the power comes on earlier(and more)to the point that it now makes boost(and power) where it didnt before, excellent result must be happy as a pig in s#$t. Whats the driving difference like?

has made a huge difference on the road...it has really livened up the midrange and made the car more streetable.

"thats if 550 AWKW can ever be described as streetable"

This goes against convential thinking...but...

an incorrectly matched cam and turbo package can make or break a build.

this was a laggy set-up till slightly bigger camshafts were installed

around 300 more KW at 150kph...wow

Those waving lines in the top are just due to big power,Wheelspin and IRS moving on the dyno

car cannot be dynod in 2 gears look at the speed they are doing and also Gearing on the dyno will only give u 10-20 hp difference not 300kw

Yes shoot8 is more load better for high hp

and great power gain mate

Ps its a Street car

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...