Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

89 R32 GTR for sale Midnight blue $18,000

mods are

T78 Trust/Greddy

50mm Wastegate

Greddy blow off valve

Forged pistons

stainless top mont manifold

820cc trust injectors/ just been flowed and seals replaced

Huge aftermarket cams from japan.

Greddy twin entry fuel rail and reg.

Braided fuel lines

BIG fuel pump unsure of brand.]

Two stage boost controler

BLITZ 600x300x120 intercooler NEW

Tripal core radiator

Triple plate clutch/NEW thrust bearing

MINES twin air pods/GREDDY pipe to turbo

4 inch exhaust from turbo back

APEXI POWER FC with controller new in box not fitted.

Lowered springs/new wheel bearings

Near New ventilated disks

19x9.5 inch Starcorp racing impul wheels/ 80-90% tread

R33 drivers seat

new autometre guages and cups not fitted still in box's/Oil Press and Water temp

VENOM 30 pound boost guage NEW not fitted

126,000kms

The car has a slightly bent front left control arm and the paint work has been keyed from the front quarter to the boot. And the exhaust is very slightly damaged.]

I have had the car at JAKES PERFORMANCE canberra to test and inspect the car and sort out a coil pack problem..It made 279kw at the rears on 9 pound . 350-400 kw at all four's on 18-20 pound. contact Andrew on 0402658374

post-34083-1166775289.jpg

post-34083-1166775458.jpg

Edited by r32 gtr T78
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148400-for-sale-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

What caused the bent control arm?

Exactly which panels have been keyed? What is the rest of the paint like condition-wise?

How long ago was the engine built with the forged pistons, and who built it?

Is this car located in Canberra?

  • 4 weeks later...
seems very cheap...

It is cheap. The car belongs to a friend of mine. The car is located in Orange 50km from bathurst. The control arm is bent from a slight mishap with a medium strip (no rim damage). Has been quoted $350 to repair. The panels that have been keyed are front quarter, drivers door, rear quarter and boot. The rest of the paint is average. The engine was built in japan so exact details are unknown. For more details call Andrew. He doesnt get on the net much so dont expect replies from pm's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...