Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://63.240.161.99/motoroil/index.html

from other thread.

I just read the first page. I may have read it wrong, but almost seems as if it's very hard to go too thin, that's not that problem. Goes as thin as possible

http://63.240.161.99/motoroil/index.html

from other thread.

I just read the first page. I may have read it wrong, but almost seems as if it's very hard to go too thin, that's not that problem. Goes as thin as possible

I just read that link, and I agree. Thinner is better, for daily street use anyway.

I use fully synthethic in my RB25, and have since the day i got it

I Use Kendall full mineral oil in my R33. 20W50 in Summer and 10W40 in Winter. The stuff is absolutely fantastic. It basically stops engine wear and has the same if not better properties as synthetic oil including burn point.

Hey how are we all?? Just wondering I was speaking to a mechanic and was advised that full synthetic oil may be abit too thin for my R33 and for security has said that semi synthetic would be a safe choice. What do you guys think??

not true. oil thickness is not directly affected by whether it's synthetic or not. my advice is go for a good full synthetic. something in 10W40 should be fine. personally I like motul chrono 300V, but it's pretty pricey. there may be other options nearly as good, but for much less $$.

10W60 is not neccisarily a good choice. ideally you want the two weights as close together as possible. because to make an oil have the property of a 10 weight at one temp and a 60 weight at another requires a lot of additives. even a 10W40 has the hot weight 4 times the cold. 6 times is too much imo. 3 times or less is desirable. but I live with the 10W40 as it's a synthetic ester base.

Get a new mechanic, he has no clue about engines.

Beer Baron's rule of thumb is true for mineral oils at least, as they do have a natural tendency to thin out when hot, so additives are added to reduce this. The wider the vis range the more additives (which break down over time, meaning your vis changes).

Synthetic oils don't thin as much, and don't require as much additive.

Only go for a 50 or 60 weight when racing. It's much too thick for the street.

5W-30 or 0W-30 fully synthetic is perfect.

What are you guys thoughts on the fuchs (spelling??) fully synthetic 15w40 for a rb25det? ive used it in my old gtst rb20det and my current gts25t and never had any problems with it.

What are you guys thoughts on the fuchs (spelling??) fully synthetic 15w40 for a rb25det? ive used it in my old gtst rb20det and my current gts25t and never had any problems with it.

i use the Fuchs 10W-30 (full syn)

love it good stuff

i think for skylines you need a good full syn oil

RellikZephyr

Keep in mind guys, when the RB family of engines were designed in the 80's, synthetic oil wasn't terribly common. They were designed to use a 7.5W-30 mineral oil. Use this as a minimum and anything better will just be a bonus. I've tried the Nissan 7.5W-30 and it's pretty crap compared to pretty much all non-mineral oils.

With the numbers though, the first number (eg 5W) is the weight or viscosity of the oil - the higher the number, the thicker it is. Thicker oils offer greater protection but don't flow around your engine very well, which is where the second number comes in. The second number (eg 50) represents the amount of protection it offers - ie the protection of a 50W oil.

So the ideal situation is to have a thin oil that will flow easily to cover every component as quickly as possible, but have the highest protection.

You don't want to go too thin though like 0W which may actually drain down while sitting at the traffic lights quicker than your idling engine can get the oil up to the top.

I personally use Mobil 1 or Penzoil 5W-50 in my GTR. Probably not entirely neccesary, but I'm not taking any chances - I want the best for my baby :(

Edited by EVIL TWIN
Keep in mind guys, when the RB family of engines were designed in the 80's, synthetic oil wasn't terribly common. They were designed to use a 7.5W-30 mineral oil. Use this as a minimum and anything better will just be a bonus. I've tried the Nissan 7.5W-30 and it's pretty crap compared to pretty much all non-mineral oils.

With the numbers though, the first number (eg 5W) is the weight or viscosity of the oil - the higher the number, the thicker it is. Thicker oils offer greater protection but don't flow around your engine very well, which is where the second number comes in. The second number (eg 50) represents the amount of protection it offers - ie the protection of a 50W oil.

So the ideal situation is to have a thin oil that will flow easily to cover every component as quickly as possible, but have the highest protection.

You don't want to go too thin though like 0W which may actually drain down while sitting at the traffic lights quicker than your idling engine can get the oil up to the top.

I personally use Mobil 1 or Penzoil 5W-50 in my GTR. Probably not entirely neccesary, but I'm not taking any chances - I want the best for my baby :(

Um, eh?

The first number (before the W) indicates the oil viscosity when cold.

The second number indicates its viscosity when hot.

So mobil 1 5W50 viscosity is 105 centistokes at 40 degrees C & 17.5 centistokes at 100 degrees C. 0W40 equivalent numbers are 80 & 14. The hot end is more important because you can cook the oil in a GT-R quite easilly with no cooler. This is why a higher viscosity hot temperature property can be a good thing.

These are physical properties of the oil & don't refer to it's protection. For that you need look at different API ratings for the oils. I don't know what "the amount of protection - ie the protection of a 50W oil." means.

Try the Mobil website....

http://www.mobil.com/Australia-English/LCW...c_V_Mineral.asp

you cant go wrong sticking to manifacturers specs when its a daily driven street car. For turbo piston engines, fully synthetic is better, because of the lower additives, and higher "cooking" point, which is needed when passing through the turbo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The exhaust gases are at their highest temperature as they leave the exhaust port and enter the manifold. They cool as they flow through the manifold because they transfer heat to the manifold and the manifold loses heat to the surrounding environment. Thus, inevitably, the exhaust gases are cooler as they enter the turbo compared to when they entered the exhaust manifold. So, yes, the exhaust manifold can easily get as hot as the turbine housing. Having said that, you will generally see the highest temperatures where the exhaust gases have to slow down or they are concentrated into one area - which is usually the collector on the manifold and in the turbine housing, because the gases slam into the metal at those places, increasing the convective heat transfer coefficient and transferring even more heat to the metal than they might just flowing past elsewhere. Exhaust manifold heat shields are a good idea - certainly for the stock manifold they are there from the factory. People seldom have anything like that on a tubular manifold because they are hard to achieve. Some might wrap a tube manifold with fibreglass tape - but this has a reputation of leading to cracked welds. The best case is generally to put ceramic coating onto the manifold to prevent it getting as hot (internal coating) and radiating/convecting heat into the bay (external coating). All the real heat from a turbo comes from the exhaust side. The gases entering are at ~800-900°C and the steel/iron gets nearly that hot. The compressor side is only going to heat the charge air up to <<200°C (typically not much more than 100°C). So that's nothing, by comparison. The compressor is not a significant source of engine bay heat.
    • Late to the party, specifically joined this forum as I just bought one of these and this thread has been a gold mine of info. If the OP is still around, mind if I ask what gas you been putting in yours? Mine has a Japanese sticker in the cap saying premium but it seems to get way worse mileage on premium (95) than 91. I always thought it was meant to be the other way round🤷 I do think Nissans claimed "6l/100km" is a bit fantastical 😂
    • Does exhaust manifold get hot as turno exhuast side? I have a turbo cover to managr heat in the engine bay but  nothing is covering the exhaust manifold before turbo   i know as turbo does compress air, the temp does go up however does that mean exhaust manifold would be as hot?
    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
×
×
  • Create New...