Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If Anyone can help me I was looking for some information about the ENR34 2000 non turbo model AWD system as I am thinking about purchasing this car. What I wanted to know, is it the attesa? system or constant AWD and does anyone know of any way to disable the front wheels like you can on the attesa system? Any help would be good

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148899-enr34-awd-system/
Share on other sites

I would put money on it being the attessa system. Nissan wouldn't R&D a new symeterical AWD system for the lower end of their market.

I scratch my head everytime someone asks how to disable the attessa system, I mean once you do - you really have a GTS with a heavy front end. One day I plan on owning my own GTR, and their is no way I would be changing the AWD system thats had millions of dollars spent in R&D on how it reacts to conditions, to adjust it to a backyarders idea of how it should perform.

Cheers

Sumo

sometimes its handy to be rwd for a bit
It's RWD most of the time! AWD is only engaged under certain conditions, like cornering, or rear-wheel slip.

Frankly, if you don't like the idea of Nissan's AWD system, don't get a car with it fitted; get a plain old common-or-garden RWD, like a Falcodore.

It's RWD most of the time! AWD is only engaged under certain conditions, like cornering, or rear-wheel slip.

Frankly, if you don't like the idea of Nissan's AWD system, don't get a car with it fitted; get a plain old common-or-garden RWD, like a Falcodore.

sometimes its nice to STAY in rwd

I would put money on it being the attessa system. Nissan wouldn't R&D a new symeterical AWD system for the lower end of their market.

I scratch my head everytime someone asks how to disable the attessa system, I mean once you do - you really have a GTS with a heavy front end. One day I plan on owning my own GTR, and their is no way I would be changing the AWD system thats had millions of dollars spent in R&D on how it reacts to conditions, to adjust it to a backyarders idea of how it should perform.

Cheers

Sumo

Oh okay cause I was under the impression that the attesa system was electronically initiated, and I heard that you can just remove the fuse to disable the attesa system which sends all the power to the rear wheels, with no front wheel drive at all. Also you can just install a switch which enables you to turn of the attesa, I'm not really sure if this is true or what? but if so thats great.

Oh okay cause I was under the impression that the attesa system was electronically initiated, and I heard that you can just remove the fuse to disable the attesa system which sends all the power to the rear wheels, with no front wheel drive at all.
I'm pretty sure that only works with the R32s. If you do that on a 33 or 34, they go into "limp home" mode.
Also you can just install a switch which enables you to turn of the attesa, I'm not really sure if this is true or what? but if so thats great.
Which is why someone worked out that the switch by-passes the "limp home" function.
actually when u pull the fuse on the r32's it compltely kill the front wheels, but the r33 and r34 the clutch pack is tightened by a spring (or somethign along those lines). basicly they will still be in rwd mode when u pull the fuse.

I'm sorry I don't really undestand can you explain in dumbas language I don't know much about cars.

I'll put it simply for you as everyone else seems to be avoiding giving you an answer.

The R34 25GT FOUR does in fact use ATESSA. They are a great car and if you don't want something fast and like the idea of 4WD would be a great car.

Why bother disabiling the atessa? it's not like he's gonna drift it, and it ain't a crazy performance car so you should be fine.

If you want it to be RWD nissan also make model that is only RWD, therefore you will win either way.

Personally a 4 door auto with 4WD sounds like an awesome car to me.

  • 1 month later...

Hey Guys,

Sorry to dig up an old thread, but had some questions relating to the ENR34, Particualr the 2 Door, Manual, AWD version.

1. Is the drivetrain out of a r33GTR? or more similar to a stagea RSFour.

2. Would it be as simiple as drop in a rb26 and instant GTR?

Thanks

Mario

Hey Guys,

Sorry to dig up an old thread, but had some questions relating to the ENR34, Particualr the 2 Door, Manual, AWD version.

1. Is the drivetrain out of a r33GTR? or more similar to a stagea RSFour.

2. Would it be as simiple as drop in a rb26 and instant GTR?

Thanks

Mario

I have a 2 door, manual r34 gt-four (had it about 2months now) and not many people really know the facts about their set-up, and this is only what i have found after reading up but mostly just driving the car.

1. Yes it uses the same atessa system as the gtr (which is only the computer side of things)

2. No its not a gtr gearbox, its definately not the r34 gtr box cause thats 6 spd, and the gt-four just doesnt "feel" strong like a gtr box, i would say its more along the lines internally of a rb25de box (same as a rb20det) or maybe a rb25det with the obvious casing changes to attach a transfer box.

3. No you cannot pull a fuse and turn it into rwd, that ONLY works for the r32's. Like previously said the car will go into a limp mode. Driving around like this will damage the front diffs clutches. Apparently you can disconnect the front shafts and it will go to rwd but the amont of effort to do it, just by a gtst.

4. HKS torque splitters can be fitted to adjust how much power is distributed to the front and rear. There is NO way to turn all the power to the rear, even with maximum power set to the rear, there will still be about 5% of the power still being sent to the front diff, which means no sitting on the brakes doing a big trev skid.

Although, with about 95% of the power going to the rear, that should be enough to step out around corners.

5. At the stock power level, the car just feels safe to drive in the dry around any corner. I can boot first gear take a 90 degree bend while smashing second and the ass end will attempt to come out but then the front just grips and puts you straight ahead, the car will understeer before it oversteers into a corner.

The wet is another story, since it is mainly rwd it will go VERY sideways if pushed but its a very easily controlled sideways since you can always feel the front helping you stay in control. So pretty much what i'm saying is if you want to go "drifting" like intial D in this car wait till its wet, go to somewhere quite, and have all the fun then, otherwise get a gtst.

6. The rb26 can bolt straight up and id say that once that was done, even in the dry the awd system will be smoking all fours around corners. A more budjet friendly solution is to get a stegea neo rb25det, change the front diff over with the stock gtfour one and your have a 206kw motor in your car cheap. Another good reason to go the stegea motor is that you stock gtfour harness will bolt up and the r34 ecu is flashable so you can get it retuned without spending dollars on a new ecu or piggy back.

Im planning to put a stagea motor in my car, and the more i learn about the gt-four i will post up cause its a bit of a mystery...

Edited by R34GTFOUR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...