Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've done a few track days in this car now and I'm still finding the Attessa is really slow in engaging. Around corners it won't really engage and whilest going straight it seems to take a while. If I go over a speed hump the torque gauge goes up and just sits there if I'm doing a constant speed until I change my driving?

Do all r32 gtr's when you launch take about 1/2 second to engage?

Is there a pressure that the pump should apply that I could check with a pressure gauge on the bleed nipple? It has been bled properly. Does the torque gauge read pressure in the line or is it what the Attessa computer thinks its sending?

This car has never had the 4wd working right. I put abs in the car as it never had it installed but it didn't really help much.

It is now really starting to give me the shits. I sold the gtst and bought the gtr so I could go faster on the track I have done everything to it now to get it sorted apart from this issue?

The transfer case should be good considering it worked in the other car and does lockup tight in this one eventually.

I don't really know how other 32's handle because I haven't been in any others and I'm trying no to buy a TSC until I get it a little better or is this how the 32 gtr's handle?

Any ideas? I need help.

r ugly poos (32) have slow attessas.

Attessa on the r33 has about 10 times as fast reaction time (from memory, I dont' have the figures with me because i'm not at home).

I can't tell how your car drives e.g. whether it's actually half a second or if it just feels long.

Best you can is bleed the attessa system

R32 attessa is slow... nearly 1/2 a second sounds about right.

R33/34 use a different system (which is quicker), and a different computer (which is quicker).

They also have a (small) preload, which gives a much better feel to the car under most driving conditions

There are controllers that will adjust the front torque up for cornering (via forum name Duncan, I think), but I don't know of any that will give a permanent preload for an R32 (and if they did, I don't know if the clutch packs would suffer excssive wear or anything). I was going to try and wire up a primitive resistor based one (it appears to be possible), but I just havn't had the time.

MANWHORE - ugly? pot calls kettle "black"

(no accounting for taste)

:D

--ebola

yeah, that doesn't sound right to me. on launch in my 32 GTR all 4 wheels spin together. I think by the time the driveline has taken up the slack, and the wheels start to break traction the fwd is engaged.

same thing happens to my gtr, even 2nd chirps before the fwd do anything, when i smash it in.

the r32 box is differant to the r33/34 boxs in the way that the 33/34's a preloaded via a spring (or something alomg those lines) which helps it kick in quicker.

plus the electronics are faster too, the r32 attessa computer reads the abs sensors a hell of a lot slower than the the r33 etc.

ive always thought about a r33 4wd conversion, but money is an issue.

steve

PhatR32 it sounds like you have a transfer case issue.

Mine had excesive wheel spin when I bought it. It had fried clutches in the transfer.

Mines just like Beer Barons, I can launch it from a stand still and there is bugger all wheel spin if anything. Second gear brings a wallop of tourque steer as all four wheels break traction together.

The attessa still anticipates wheel spin via throttle position even if its stationary so dispite being slower id still expect it to be fairly quick off the line.

As for cornering get used to the way the car behaves and then make changes accordingly with a controller etc. I treat mine like a RWD vehcile when on the circuit. If it steps out of line the attessa gives me some alowance before steping in and giving a hand.

I don't plan to fit a controller I like the way it drives once you get passed the understeer. Each to his own though.

sounds like a transfer issue. I had the same thing with my GTS4, where it was laggy in engaging AWD (i'd get a RWD launch then about a second into it the front would kick in violently)... did a full AWD check from bleeding and refilling the ATTESA system, then pulled apart the transfer and swapped in replacement gears from a GTR... launches really well now, with very little RWD wheelspin, and a smoother transition.

R32's have an 8bit ATTESA CPU wheras R33's have a 16bit, and later models gettin a 32bit one (or something along those lines).

Most cheapie torque split controllers do SFA... its much more fun when you figure out how to drive the car with ATTESA.

This controller is not cheap and it does not do SFA. It is a computer unto itself, it intercepts the signal form the G sensor and decided what needs to happen based on your input - it has 5 seperate maps for 5 different styles of driving and each can be adjusted to be more or less sensitive to Gforce, additionally a switch can be installed to allow you to quick-switch between two seperate setups. Personally, my switch switch's between aggressive AWD and bog stock for day to day use.

It also has a full datalogging facility.

same thing happens to my gtr, even 2nd chirps before the fwd do anything, when i smash it in.

the r32 box is differant to the r33/34 boxs in the way that the 33/34's a preloaded via a spring (or something alomg those lines) which helps it kick in quicker.

plus the electronics are faster too, the r32 attessa computer reads the abs sensors a hell of a lot slower than the the r33 etc.

ive always thought about a r33 4wd conversion, but money is an issue.

steve

a lot of that is not quite right. firstly, that's not how your awd system should be operating, so some maintenance there may help. secondly the box is not different, and the gearbox has nothing to do with awd, it's the transfer case which is a completely seperate thing (though conected to the rear of the gearbox).

yes the R33 and R34 transfer cases have pre-load on the clutch plates. I have looked at a couple and can't see any springs, I think it's more to do with the number of plates, and hydraulic pressure giving that preload. yes the computers are different, and I assume their mapping is different too. there is a lot more too it than just the abs sensors though. steering angle, g-forces, throttle position and yes individual wheel speed do all play a part in it's calculations.

just wanted to clear that info up :)

yepi also get a nice wack of rear wheel spin when lauched..id say transfer case,same as me although i hope not...

just take it out get in checked..i think i read in hpi that its not cheap but worth it rather thatn buying another 2nd handy

thanks for that, i was meant to say transfer and not box!

as for the preload, ive read a few places that mension springs, as well as hearing about people (33/34 owners) having to remove their front drive shafts while get a rwd dyno done to avoid burning out the clutch packs due to the pre load.

that led me to beleive that springs where involved, because if you pulled the fuse on the atessa pump there wouldnt be any pressure on the plate from the fluid.

maybe there are springs one the clutch plates them selves? again i have seen the 33/34 transfers so i really shouldnt comment.

i may have to look into why my gtr kicks in late, it only happens for a split second, with wet lanuches she grips like shit to fur.

steve

a lot of that is not quite right. firstly, that's not how your awd system should be operating, so some maintenance there may help. secondly the box is not different, and the gearbox has nothing to do with awd, it's the transfer case which is a completely seperate thing (though conected to the rear of the gearbox).

yes the R33 and R34 transfer cases have pre-load on the clutch plates. I have looked at a couple and can't see any springs, I think it's more to do with the number of plates, and hydraulic pressure giving that preload. yes the computers are different, and I assume their mapping is different too. there is a lot more too it than just the abs sensors though. steering angle, g-forces, throttle position and yes individual wheel speed do all play a part in it's calculations.

just wanted to clear that info up :thumbsup:

thanks for that, i was meant to say transfer and not box!

as for the preload, ive read a few places that mension springs, as well as hearing about people (33/34 owners) having to remove their front drive shafts while get a rwd dyno done to avoid burning out the clutch packs due to the pre load.

that led me to beleive that springs where involved, because if you pulled the fuse on the atessa pump there wouldnt be any pressure on the plate from the fluid.

maybe there are springs one the clutch plates them selves? again i have seen the 33/34 transfers so i really shouldnt comment.

i may have to look into why my gtr kicks in late, it only happens for a split second, with wet lanuches she grips like shit to fur.

steve

come to think of it mine grips like shit to blanket on dirt or in the wet 2...maybe the transfer case is ok.or maybe because there isnt as much grip the plates just dont slip as they dont need to bite as hard...

hmmmmm, check out the pics in the shopmanuals, the one in jap is the r34 one and the english one is for th r32. from one the pics i can see both have a return spring. maybe the r34 one is stronger/larger?

or maybe theres now differance between them at all?

steve

post-11604-1167829929.jpg

post-11604-1167829948.jpg

Edited by PHATR32

hmmm, i wonder?

can anyone with a r33/34 gtr pull the attessa fuse, and "drop a banger" on some wet grass and see what happens? or jack up all four and accelerate a litte, then get someone to hold the front wheels to see there is some force?

steve

same thing happens to my gtr, even 2nd chirps before the fwd do anything, when i smash it in.

the r32 box is differant to the r33/34 boxs in the way that the 33/34's a preloaded via a spring (or something alomg those lines) which helps it kick in quicker.

plus the electronics are faster too, the r32 attessa computer reads the abs sensors a hell of a lot slower than the the r33 etc.

ive always thought about a r33 4wd conversion, but money is an issue.

steve

Me too. On takeoff there is the tiniest bit of spin from the rears and then the front hooks in. Also when i bang it into second i always get chirps as well. But my transfer has 4,000km on it and was fully rebuilt...spent 6k!

I thought that was the way its sposed to be? ...and yes has been bled blah blah...

Thanks for the responses.

How far does the oil drop in the tank in the boot in some of your cars when the ignition is turned on for the first time in the day? From memory mine drops about 10mm.

The amount it drops could be an indication of any air in the system or that I have the wrong type of oil and it is being compressed to much and maybe I need a less compressable oil for better response?

well from my experiance the r32 atessa isnt as quick or should i say the car is heaps taily then it cuts in.

i followd you for a few laps a wakefield. it seemed it worked fine. lots of steering input but. was good to watch. your car seemed evan tailier than mine lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...