Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So let me get this right, if i remove the 4 hole caps off the top of the RB25DET injectors they would they would be at ~550cc flow?

If this is so then im WRAPPED lol but how come none of the tuners have ever discovered this? would the single pintle flow cause any disruption to economy? or cause unburnt fuel?

Cheers

people do know, iv heared of people doing this to wrx injectors for at least a year if not more.

on the test bench the one i done just squirted out one large jet rather then four from the factory 4 hole plate, i dont know what this would do for atomisation etc, but at the end of the day its still only 4 jets not some special mist.

Yes his input would be good .

Just on the RB25DET 370cc injectors I think they end up in the 550-600's depending on fuel rail pressure . The 270cc variety may be the same thing with smaller cap holes .

I'm trying to find out if Pulsar GA16 injectors are side feed and what they are likely to give with the cap removed because some people may want a cheap mid 400's cc injector .

From what the Americans say about the Subaru and Nissan injectors the spray pattern is like a narrow angle cone .

Just to refresh can some one put up the cc/Hp formula please .

Cheers A .

you would need an aftermarket ecu that can tune each cylinder individually and a wideband o2 sensor for each cylinder to make the most of this mod.

Why would this be any different than fitting aftermarket injectors?

I agree with the ecu (or other piggyback/cut devices) to tune for best power/efficiency, but O2 sensors for each cylinder is a bit over the top.

you would need an aftermarket ecu that can tune each cylinder individually and a wideband o2 sensor for each cylinder to make the most of this mod.

Yep definitely no need for individual pot o2 sensor.

Get them flow tested and trim each cylinder accordingly. Or as people often do shove the slightly higher flowing injectors towards the back of the motor where its hotter.

Yep definitely no need for individual pot o2 sensor.

Get them flow tested and trim each cylinder accordingly. Or as people often do shove the slightly higher flowing injectors towards the back of the motor where its hotter.

So will anyone confirm whether this is a viable option and what disadvantages there are in doing this opposed to buying aftermarket ones?

Sounds a bit ghetto to me

You have to wait till someone can compare the spray patterns of two...

Which would be either a static pic or some video of good quality, as the comparo between the two is whats going to be most valuable to this thread

Until then, its a bit hard to make a call. Great thread this with some potentially great info, lets just not all spam away asking if its possible until someone actually does some indepth testing :)

I flowed a shaved injector today, the spray pattern was just one fine jet, when compared to a stock injector it just had 4 jets, looked exactly the same just four rather then one.

I dont know what a good flow is suposed to look like, but its was just one big jet rather then 4 smaller ones.

No doubt it would look similar to the well known top feed rx7 550cc 'squirters'. :)

Best bet is to have some one check the injector out who knows injectors, let them know what you have done and have them comment on the spray pattern.

Remember the top feed gtr and r32 gts/t injectors are all single spray.

I'm linishing a set for my friends SR20 atm.

Also I know a turbo suzuki 1300 bike that uses "shaved" WRX injectors (they flow 880 cc or so) and that makes about 280 rwkw on them and does fine.

Also no matter what the jet its going to slam into the valve/head anyway and spray everywhere so I don't see it being a huge problem.

My friend will give it a go and see, aparently the varience of "shaved" injector flowrate is generally larger then proper large injectors from what i have seen.

Edited by GTR1993
Remember the top feed gtr and r32 gts/t injectors are all single spray.

Personally i run rx7 ser V squirters which are thought to be bad in the spray pattern dept., but im getting similar fuel economy to Cubes (10L/100km) with his GTR injectors.

People here with r33's are getting the same economy (if not worse) with their supposed better quad squirters.

Everyone tunes for the 12:1, so if we all get the same fuel economy and AFR's then i say go for it, as spray pattern wont mean much to the final product -UNLESS its a big dribbler

I dont think its a good idea to play with injectors that much. I went for the Nismo 740cc injectors 4 hole injectors as ive seen too many engines blow up from high flowed injectors or old rx7 550cc injectors. so i went new ones.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks Duncan! Yeah it's street use for me only. Maybe occasional track day. Any difference in noise when running with the two pumps? I would expect the lift pump to be more quiet than the main pump so hopefully not? And yes, unfortunately quite a big price difference to the simple hanger setup. Though I'm usually willing to trade money for better reliability and future-proofing. Buy once, cry once and all that. I'd be very happy to never have to deal with fuel pump / wiring issues again  
    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
×
×
  • Create New...