Jump to content
SAU Community

"shaved Injectors" ?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So let me get this right, if i remove the 4 hole caps off the top of the RB25DET injectors they would they would be at ~550cc flow?

If this is so then im WRAPPED lol but how come none of the tuners have ever discovered this? would the single pintle flow cause any disruption to economy? or cause unburnt fuel?

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people do know, iv heared of people doing this to wrx injectors for at least a year if not more.

on the test bench the one i done just squirted out one large jet rather then four from the factory 4 hole plate, i dont know what this would do for atomisation etc, but at the end of the day its still only 4 jets not some special mist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes his input would be good .

Just on the RB25DET 370cc injectors I think they end up in the 550-600's depending on fuel rail pressure . The 270cc variety may be the same thing with smaller cap holes .

I'm trying to find out if Pulsar GA16 injectors are side feed and what they are likely to give with the cap removed because some people may want a cheap mid 400's cc injector .

From what the Americans say about the Subaru and Nissan injectors the spray pattern is like a narrow angle cone .

Just to refresh can some one put up the cc/Hp formula please .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you would need an aftermarket ecu that can tune each cylinder individually and a wideband o2 sensor for each cylinder to make the most of this mod.

Why would this be any different than fitting aftermarket injectors?

I agree with the ecu (or other piggyback/cut devices) to tune for best power/efficiency, but O2 sensors for each cylinder is a bit over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you would need an aftermarket ecu that can tune each cylinder individually and a wideband o2 sensor for each cylinder to make the most of this mod.

Yep definitely no need for individual pot o2 sensor.

Get them flow tested and trim each cylinder accordingly. Or as people often do shove the slightly higher flowing injectors towards the back of the motor where its hotter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep definitely no need for individual pot o2 sensor.

Get them flow tested and trim each cylinder accordingly. Or as people often do shove the slightly higher flowing injectors towards the back of the motor where its hotter.

So will anyone confirm whether this is a viable option and what disadvantages there are in doing this opposed to buying aftermarket ones?

Sounds a bit ghetto to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to wait till someone can compare the spray patterns of two...

Which would be either a static pic or some video of good quality, as the comparo between the two is whats going to be most valuable to this thread

Until then, its a bit hard to make a call. Great thread this with some potentially great info, lets just not all spam away asking if its possible until someone actually does some indepth testing :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I flowed a shaved injector today, the spray pattern was just one fine jet, when compared to a stock injector it just had 4 jets, looked exactly the same just four rather then one.

I dont know what a good flow is suposed to look like, but its was just one big jet rather then 4 smaller ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No doubt it would look similar to the well known top feed rx7 550cc 'squirters'. :)

Best bet is to have some one check the injector out who knows injectors, let them know what you have done and have them comment on the spray pattern.

Remember the top feed gtr and r32 gts/t injectors are all single spray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm linishing a set for my friends SR20 atm.

Also I know a turbo suzuki 1300 bike that uses "shaved" WRX injectors (they flow 880 cc or so) and that makes about 280 rwkw on them and does fine.

Also no matter what the jet its going to slam into the valve/head anyway and spray everywhere so I don't see it being a huge problem.

My friend will give it a go and see, aparently the varience of "shaved" injector flowrate is generally larger then proper large injectors from what i have seen.

Edited by GTR1993
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember the top feed gtr and r32 gts/t injectors are all single spray.

Personally i run rx7 ser V squirters which are thought to be bad in the spray pattern dept., but im getting similar fuel economy to Cubes (10L/100km) with his GTR injectors.

People here with r33's are getting the same economy (if not worse) with their supposed better quad squirters.

Everyone tunes for the 12:1, so if we all get the same fuel economy and AFR's then i say go for it, as spray pattern wont mean much to the final product -UNLESS its a big dribbler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think its a good idea to play with injectors that much. I went for the Nismo 740cc injectors 4 hole injectors as ive seen too many engines blow up from high flowed injectors or old rx7 550cc injectors. so i went new ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, yeah, no arguing that the duty cycle is different. And a circuit car will go to those speeds for more distance and longer times. But, I suspect that if a tailshaft has a harmonic problem, that it would cause damage and shit itself maybe even on the first pass. A second or two of running at the resonant/harmonic problem speed is already a couple hundred revolutions.
    • Shaft speed would be the same, however it's how long they hold it there for and repeated conditions. FWIW half way down the main straight at SMSP I'm bouncing off 4th with a 8600RPM limiter. That shaft would be spinning at 8600RPM for a few seconds before I need to smash the brakes, by T2 it's getting close to that speed again. Now a drag car/roll race car would see that shaft speed for a 1 to 2 secs then they would coast, hit the brakes and that's it.
    • With same diff ratio, tyre diameter and road speed, the tailshaft rpm is the same regardless of the gearbag's ratio. Given that very quick drag cars are probably doing similar road speeds to the fastest circuit cars (circa 300 km/h), and there will be many of either category that can't go that fast and so you'd have inummerable matchups between drag and circuit car speeds at smaller numbers, and given that they are probably using rather similar tyre diameters and probably using similar diff ratios, and...where any of those numbers were different they could quite easily be in opposite directions thus cancelling out.... I think you'd find that there'd be more similarity than difference in tailshaft speed between these two use cases, no?
    • they might see those prop shaft speeds for 1 to 2 secs only 
    • A year of slogging through this bearing issue and finally fixed. What a nightmare. The oil pressure increase did not fix the problem. If you would like to read all the details in case you ever run into a similar issue visit my thread on Yellow Bullet. https://www.yellowbullet.com/threads/continuous-rod-bearing-issues.2689569/?post_id=74193031&nested_view=1&sortby=oldest#post-74193031 In the end the rod bearings themselves were the issue. I had switched from ACL (first engine) to King because that was all we could get at the time and I thought nothing of it. Put the ACL's back in after a year of taking the pan off multiple times to change many things. Issue resolved. Can't believe it was just the bearings themselves all along. It has now been about two years since I drove the car on the street or had it at the track. At some point I had installed all solid and spherical bushings in the rear but had never aligned it since it just went on and off the dyno. Alignment was the first thing to do. (Old photo but same concept) Then I took the transmission out and went through it. This was my first gearset install and I've done about 15 since this one and learned a lot and wanted to apply some of these tweaks to mine. The aftermarket shift forks take very well to some modification and I wanted to make that change. Shifts are now super smooth and no having to find the gear. I also recut the 5th and reverse shift sleeves - always wanted to try this and see how well it works. It works very well! No grinds or having to do a second attempt going into reverse and 5th is perfect. Before During After Going back in In rummaging through my spare trans parts box I found the only parts I've ever broke on a stock trans; the 3-4 shift fork - twice!  
×
×
  • Create New...