Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i wanna know

stocker GTO twin turbo 4wd v6 3l... vs stocker r33 GTR twin turbo 2.6l straight 6

who wins drag? circuit? any comments

i know the 1990 gto has much better tech with active aero and active suspension (apparently the suspension lowers it self and the front lip comes down AS ive been told by someone who is selling his car)

go go go answer my q's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/149603-mitsubish-gto-vs-gtr/
Share on other sites

I belive all thing that are good about a GTO is what also makes them such a pain to mod stock for stock GTOs arnt slow and do 100kph in 1st but still think a GTR would win all. GTO has more wiring then is good for it i wanted one before i brought my GTR but very lttle info about mods out there.

Agree with GorGasm 100%

I hear they have a glass transfer case that costs you a kidney when it breaks also :wave:

Not only that, the gearbox is not the strongest either - you'll find many GTO/Dodge Stealth owners have had the gearboxes reconditioned/rebuilt.

GTOs look nice but they are heavy, don't handle too well and expensive to maintain - basically Mitsubishi's version of the 300ZX

you're going to get a bias opinion on a skyline forum... but here is my opinion, might be biased since i've never owned a GTO..

They look nice - one of the guys in sau vic has one, looks hot, and goes well, very responsive, being 3L.... but i belive they are heavy compared to a GTR, handling isn't quite GTR class, and they cost a lot to make go fast, mainly because not many people have put the R&D into them here compared to GTRs....

gtos look wider than the gtrs on the street - they look good, but i reckon they go crap when compared to gtrs. They are too heavy - but can be modded to do some fast times. Interior looks way too daunting for my liking..

I own both cars, i think the GTR is a true race car out of the GTO but GTO does have lot more torque compared with the GTR.

But as as daily i would perfer a GTO because the ride is much nicer and comfortable than the GTR but if it was race track i would choose the GTR.

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (SUPRA TT , COOLER EXHAUST, CLUTCH 20PSI BOOST) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 30 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 20 YO KID

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (SUPRA TT , COOLER EXHAUST, CLUTCH 20PSI BOOST) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 30 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 20 YO KID

oh dear.....

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (GL Lancer - heaps of stickers - 4 inch tip on my stock zorst) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 130 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 12 YO KID - Then i wet my pants and woke up......

yuck........

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (SUPRA TT , COOLER EXHAUST, CLUTCH 20PSI BOOST) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 30 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 20 YO KID

great story...seriously, great story............................................................. :(:no:

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (SUPRA TT , COOLER EXHAUST, CLUTCH 20PSI BOOST) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 30 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 20 YO KID

The only down side with the GTR is to many P-platers own them. Especially ones that public education has failed.

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (SUPRA TT , COOLER EXHAUST, CLUTCH 20PSI BOOST) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 30 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 20 YO KID

damn school holidays.

I DRAGGED A GTO IN MY OLD CAR (SUPRA TT , COOLER EXHAUST, CLUTCH 20PSI BOOST) HE LAUNCHED HARD OFF THE LIGHTS BUT AFTER SECOND GEAR HE WAS NOTHING TO ME AND THEATS IN A RWD CAR I RECKON THAT THEY ARE PRETTY SLOW AND HE WAS NO YOUNJGIN LIKE ME HEA WAS LIKE MAYBOE 30 SO I WOULD IMAGING HE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE MORE EXPERIANCE THAN A 20 YO KID

awesome post. def read again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...