Jump to content
SAU Community

What Kws At The Wheels Is Ur Skyline Making...


Adz2332
 Share

Kws At The Wheels  

219 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

yep what a day, worked out in the end

Full boost before was at 4250rpm, think it is the same still , don't know to busy watching

the road:)

I can get 20+psi on just a footbrake if i want, no point though, anymore than 3200rpm

and 3 psi and it digs a hole on mt drag radials

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

yep what a day, worked out in the end

Full boost before was at 4250rpm, think it is the same still , don't know to busy watching

the road:)

I can get 20+psi on just a footbrake if i want, no point though, anymore than 3200rpm

and 3 psi and it digs a hole on mt drag radials

Darren, How much of an exhaust and what size you running?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daz, tell the real story. It was 471.3rwkw - that point 3 can make a big difference :rofl:

Three 450-470+rwkw runs, back-to-back and in 40+'c heat. Impressive stuff.

Edited by whatsisname
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 inch dump, 3 inch exhaust full length of the car, 1 big muffler

and a little muffler at the back, i have no intention on ever using no

exhaust and race fuel..its a street car, and a challenge.

first pull was 460, then 1 or 2 degrees of timing 471, was there a 450?

can't remember

cheers

darren

Edited by S3_Girl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey just like to update me kw output lol

well ive had my car tuned with the powere fc logit the other night and am running 1.3 bar std turbos

starting to make boost at 1900 rpm and full boost by about 3300 rpm and comes on pretty hard for std

the power fc logit is the way to go for sure i have no knock and and pulls hard all the way to 8000

prolly around 280 to 290 + easy

see how long b4 i need new turbo's

mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a guy is sellin his S15 and uses my dyno chart as proof of the power...

http://forum.silviansw.com/viewtopic.php?t=26296

Damn funny read.... :):D:O

Becareful guys!! Who woulda thought this shit would happen!

:laughing-smiley-014: the dumbass [insert OWNED!! image here] :laughing-smiley-014:

If he was a little smarter he could of at least photochopped it - Hi Tech Dyno, file name, power figure etc.

Nice one Busky2k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 inch dump, 3 inch exhaust full length of the car, 1 big muffler

and a little muffler at the back, i have no intention on ever using no

exhaust and race fuel..its a street car, and a challenge.

first pull was 460, then 1 or 2 degrees of timing 471, was there a 450?

can't remember

cheers

darren

Darren, Troy just told me the other day you have only just changes the stock brakes to 33 ones, WOW how did it used to pull up?? Ok?? Must be alot better now with that much power and now brakes you can trust...... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your car back yet andy?

nah paul...dropping it in today, if the clutch arrives

got held at customs for 7 days now (and $500 for duty + gst)

to "protect" the local business...but the thing is, nismo clutch can only be bought oversea, not made locally :nyaanyaa:

way to make money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok time for ppls thoughts

a mate of mine his R34 made 147RWKW @ the last dyno day and that was running stock boost

he has since got another tunner to put a boost controller on just the bleed type and a fuel cut defender and now hes making 204RWKW from a NEO ive spoken to a couple of others and i really didnt think just winding boost up to 14psi on a neo would get you over 200kw

anyone elses thoughts on these NEO engines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its around the mark considering its running the fcd. BUT 14psi is iffy on the R34 turbo.

Generally 11psi ish makes that sort of power (maybe a touch more as the R34 turbo's ted to push 10-15rwkw more than the rb25det turbo's so 210-215rwkw) when ign and fueling is optimal (ecu).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok time for ppls thoughts

a mate of mine his R34 made 147RWKW @ the last dyno day and that was running stock boost

he has since got another tunner to put a boost controller on just the bleed type and a fuel cut defender and now hes making 204RWKW from a NEO ive spoken to a couple of others and i really didnt think just winding boost up to 14psi on a neo would get you over 200kw

anyone elses thoughts on these NEO engines

Hey Madaz

Yeah sounds right. I'd say though between 12 and 14psi he would have about half a kw difference! So he should probably put the boost down a little before things go bang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...