Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We wondered where Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. possibly could go with its VQ-series 3.5L DOHC V-6 after winning a 10 Best Engines award for a dozen consecutive years. After all, most contemporary engine families don't last this long, much less last this long at the top.

So where is Nissan going? To the podium for its 13th award.

The company's engineers apparently don't intend to relinquish the VQ's now-legendary status as the definitive V-6 benchmark because this year, the fourth generation of the VQ is 80% new, flaunting revised design features that address the one development aspect in which the VQ had been slipping refinement and brewed in a fresh new level of performance, just to be certain everybody knows they're serious.

In recent 10 Best Engines competitions, Ward's editors have been straightforward about the VQ's benchmark role: It's tough to rag on a legend, but ever since the 02 model year, when Nissan bored the sweet original 3L VQ to a brawnier 3.5L, we've noted an erosion of refinement. Noise, vibration and harshness levels had been sacrificed at the altar of increased horsepower and torque.

The modular DOHC V-6 that launched in 1995 in the U.S. at 3L and 190 hp gradually had grown to 3.5L and as much as 298 hp - a 50%-plus hike in power from just a 17% increase in size.

But for the fourth-gen 07 variant, the VQ35HR, there's a critical new structural ladder frame, an enlarged crankpin and crank journal diameter, a new cylinder-head design, a trick new asymmetric piston skirt and longer connecting rods, in addition to a raft of friction-reducing updates.

The engineers out there easily will assemble the puzzle to see improved NVH was a prime target. It worked. The VQ has regained much of its hallowed silkiness. Once again, it's easy to forget to upshift, it revs so smoothly, Editor Drew Winter says.

But all that refinement attention bore gifts even better than those best appreciated by the J.D. Power quality fanatics. The HR designation for this latest-generation VQ stands for high revolution, meaning there are more revs available from an engine that always preferred the high-altitude section of the tach to begin with.

The VQ35HR now offers a luscious 7,500-rpm redline (up from 7,000 rpm with the manual transmission for the old VQ) and revs so passionately that a gearshift feels unnecessary before 6,000 rpm.

A 6,800-rpm power peak would be a warning sign in less religiously detailed engines. But for the new VQ, that region of the tach is fully and invitingly exploitable.

All those revs mean extra power, too, and the HR variant of the VQ (a fourth-gen VQ35DE with fewer of the high-rev ministrations will be fitted for several models) loads up with 306 hp and 268 lb.-ft. (363 Nm) of torque / power that matches the class-leading Lexus IS 350's 3.5L DOHC V-6, but lags it slightly in torque.

Nissan engineers say they developed the high-rev variant of the 3.5L DOHC V-6 to be a more emotional experience, and we're down with that, too.

Anytime you can spin a V-6 to 7,500 rpm, get more power and refinement and bask in magnificent new sounds specifically targeted for the HR, there's nothing to do but once again award the champion its hard-earned belt.

Source: Wards Auto

post-20773-1167866229.gif

Edited by scathing

Still, its only making an extra 8hp with that extra 500rpm of redline, and new internals. Although the shot on the Wards site doesn't show it, I believe its meant to have a dual intake rather than the single the older VQ's have had.

I would have expected far more power than just 8hp at the flywheel, especially if it spins more smoothly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
    • Sorry, I wasn't very clear.....just that the standard injectors are apparently good over 600rwhp/450rwkw which you won't get to on standard turbos anyway.....they are much better sized from factory than we are used to in RBs.
    • I'm not sure where you are, but United Terrey Hills has E85. 
×
×
  • Create New...