Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im fairly certain std rb25 headgasket is 1.2mm thick, and a 86.5mm bore first oversize (20 thou), 85mm stroke, 87mm headgasket bore size, 62cc combustion chamber head, 11.5cc dome and the rb25 piston will sit 1.2mm below deck height...not sure if i worked that out correctly though. I based it off CPs which i believe have a 0 deck height. Then i worked out 8.7:1.

Yours is a little less cause your oversize again at 40 thou over. But then your CC size is 5cc smaller. So it bumps it back up again.

I use to work it our manually until i was pointed to this site which helps alot....saves all the maths on the paper and in my head.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/compcalc.html

I just worked ours out with the cps and i get 8.2:1 CR which is exactly how they advertise them. So i know this calculator works good. That and it worked good when i rebuilt my rb25 with acl forgies. I just worked out an rb30det with acl 25 pistons with your 34 neo head and at 40 thou over with a 1mm hg i got bloudy 9.6:1CR.... thats gibson motorsport gtr territory there.

Ok one more time...Spool did the rb25 pistons have any dome on them or were they flat as a tack? Cause im pulling the specs off the acl website for their pistons. If its wrong then it could explain the weird CRs im getting in comparison to what your getting.

Edited by r33_racer

sorry I was working on acl rb30et piston

which has -4.5cc dome, 0 deck height , a compressed gasket usually works out at 1mm compressed, 88.8 mm gasket bore size ( the last few Ive had measured this )

and the more oversize you go the higher comp ratio you end up with as your swept volume increases.

So with the ACL RB30ET piston with a R33 RB25 head you end up with close enough to 8.0:1 comp - plus or minus as every engine differes a little, depending on actual comb chamber volumes, compressed head gaskets ( depending on brand etc )

Its a very precise calculation.

interesting on the headgasket...i was under the impression that a 1.2mm gasket is 1.2 when compressed. And my 1.6mm headgasket is 1.6mm when compressed. Well that .2 difference makes a difference to the CR.

My apologies, your right about the higher comp to volume increase. I had it back to front.

I was working everything off rb25 pistons not rb30et ones.

with the head gasket - I am referring to graphite gaskets. So when u meausre it on the bench, it will definately be less when compressed. A laminated steel one should theoretically be what it is advertised at. So like u said a 1.2mm should be 1.2mm when compressed. But never take it for granted, it is easy to measure with a small piece of malleable lead or similar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...