Jump to content
SAU Community

Precision Turbochargers Ball Bearing Highflow - R32, R33, R34 & Vg30


Recommended Posts

Yep, Aaron is a real nice guy and offers and excellent service... and im also providing an alternative to GCG with proven results...

Regards,

Sarkis

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

UPDATE - Jut got off the phone with one of the tuners at TUNE HOUSE and he confirmed that they have easily gotten 250 - 270rw/kw on R33's with the Precision Turbo 500HP highflow, and the $200 you save from the GCG item can go toward an EBC or any other mod...

Regards,

Sarkis

UPDATE- Just spoke to Precision Turbo's and have been advsied that they are also offering FREE postage back to you as well as all gaskets and bolds to bolt back on...

Dyno sheet will be available on this thread on friday... so keep an eye out!

Regards,

Sarkis

UPDATE- Just spoke to Precision Turbo's and have been advsied that they are also offering FREE postage back to you as well as all gaskets and bolds to bolt back on...

Dyno sheet will be available on this thread on friday... so keep an eye out!

Regards,

Sarkis

Hey Sarkis do any lines have to be modified?

Oil ect...

NYTSKY - Nope they use the stock oil and water lines... New bango bolts are supplied cause the thread on the new Garrett core are different to the stock ones... this is COMPLETE highflow and only uses your exhaust and comp housings... the rest are brand new Garrett parts.

Oi mate - I spoke to them today regarding any surge issues and they said in the past 8 years of RB turbo highflows they have done (10 per day = 25,000 units at least) that they have NEVER had any surge issues with the RB25DET highflows...

TUNE HOUSE told me that 3 of their recent R33's have landed a 270rw/kw with these highflows using Haltech ECU's

Regards,

Sarkis

scratch that, alternative sourced

EDIT: take my name off take my name off aaaaaahhh! lol...

Edited by Pauly33GTS-t

UPDATE - Dyno graphs added!

I couldn't believe the results when i first saw the dyno graph... I cant wait to get one of these babies! Common guys place your orders while these prices last...

Regards,

Sarkis

these look awesome, however I don't understand why when you get one of Slide's hi-flowed turbos he says it is compulsory to drill out the oil restrictors to allow more oil to cool the turbo, yet these and CGC don't tell you to do this.

Cause Slide's high flows are Journal bearing which require a constant oil pressure and flow...

Precision Turbo & GCG highflow's are Ball Bearing same as the factory turbo which means no moddification of the water or oil lines are needed. In other words by going to a journal bearing highflow, you are "down grading" in quality to your stock turbo...

Regards,

Sarkis

25,000 RB Highflows????

And then this gem:

In other words by going to a journal bearing highflow, you are "down grading" in quality to your stock turbo...

A journal high flow is an upgrade in every sense of the word.

Cause Slide's high flows are Journal bearing which require a constant oil pressure and flow...

In other words by going to a journal bearing highflow, you are "down grading" in quality to your stock turbo...

Sorry mate, ive got to disagree there.

there are too many differences in opinion about these turbos, how could anyone feel comfortable getting them.

i would rather go to GCG or Slide just because i know that they will make the numbers because everyone else on the forum who wants a highflow has gotten one from either. and at least Slide is a trader and a member long before that, so we all know he isnt going anywhere.

also, i just have to add that 99% of 32 and 33 gtr turbo's are journal did nissan downgrade to them for any reason?

same highflows with the same wheels producing the same numbers.. there is no difference and the fact of the matter is that ball bearing turbo's do FAIL (you have constant metal to metal contact).. journal bearing turbos ONLY fail when oil feed is interupted (there is no metal to metal contact).

and what's more, with the price of BRAND NEW garrett turbochargers these days which have an internationally backed warranty from a massively respected company, why would anyone spend MORE than the cost of a new garrett on a highflow no matter WHO makes it?

I disagree that its a "downgrade" completely. However, I don't think that the comment justified you completely writing off ball bearing highflows from this particular company. You gotta remember that was a comment from the user, not the company.

i would rather go to GCG or Slide just because i know that they will make the numbers because everyone else on the forum who wants a highflow has gotten one from either. and at least Slide is a trader and a member long before that, so we all know he isnt going anywhere.

Why? Because if you're not a trader on SAU or have Sydneykid's seal of approval then you're automatically a fraud?? These aren't good enough reasons to dismiss these turbo's. If you rang around like I have, you would find that they are quite reputable.

also, i just have to add that 99% of 32 and 33 gtr turbo's are journal did nissan downgrade to them for any reason?

No, not at all. Journal bearings better suited the applications on the RB26DETT. Just like ball bearings were better suited for the RB25DET.

same highflows with the same wheels producing the same numbers.. there is no difference and the fact of the matter is that ball bearing turbo's do FAIL (you have constant metal to metal contact).. journal bearing turbos ONLY fail when oil feed is interupted (there is no metal to metal contact).

Whats the point of this comment? Are you trying to say that journal bearings are more reliable than a ball bearing in a turbo application? Where's the evidence saying that an oil feed failure to the turbo is less likely than a ball bearing failure? At the end of the day, everything fails, it's just a matter of time.

and what's more, with the price of BRAND NEW garrett turbochargers these days which have an internationally backed warranty from a massively respected company, why would anyone spend MORE than the cost of a new garrett on a highflow no matter WHO makes it?

If you can find me a BRAND NEW Garrett turbo rated to 500hp that is a true bolt on replacement (ie. no stuffing around with oil and water lines whatsoever) for the standard item for under $1550, I'll buy it.....

That simple...

Edited by Ol_Mate
I disagree that its a "downgrade" completely. However, I don't think that the comment justified you completely writing off ball bearing highflows from this particular company. You gotta remember that was a comment from the user, not the company.

This is true but from the misleading information provided it is quite worrying to see an ambassador of a business trying to push its products and not knowing much about it to help us make a discussion on them.

Why? Because if you're not a trader on SAU or have Sydneykid's seal of approval then you're automatically a fraud?? These aren't good enough reasons to dismiss these turbo's. If you rang around like I have, you would find that they are quite reputable.

If you look at the above statements made most of them were stolen from Sydneykid.

I never said they were a fraud at all but as i have written above the information wasnt all that assuring.

No, not at all. Journal bearings better suited the applications on the RB26DETT. Just like ball bearings were better suited for the RB25DET.

Whats the point of this comment?

How is that a good generalisation of what turbo's were deemed better for an application?

Why would journal better suit a GTR (Certified race bred cars) then a much lesser sports coupe?

This was a very bad example on your part.

As by that statement you would be leading people to beleive that Journal are better suited to cars that require harder working better performing gear. >_<

Are you trying to say that journal bearings are more reliable than a ball bearing in a turbo application?

Didn't you just say that?

Where's the evidence saying that an oil feed failure to the turbo is less likely than a ball bearing failure? At the end of the day, everything fails, it's just a matter of time.

That is exactly my point and why myself and (im sure) 2rismo pointed out a silly comment like this:

In other words by going to a journal bearing highflow, you are "down grading" in quality to your stock turbo...

Very missleading and defaming (of Journal bearing systems) information that most people viewing this thread might not know about.

If you can find me a BRAND NEW Garrett turbo rated to 500hp that is a true bolt on replacement (ie. no stuffing around with oil and water lines whatsoever) for the standard item for under $1550, I'll buy it.....

That simple...

Nope its not possible but the point is who cares about ball bearing when there is no real difference to journal? Show me the differences between dyno sheets between these highflows in particular.

Cheers

First of all, my apologies for the misconception of my comments.

What I meant was, Ball Bearing turbos are superior in durability than journal bearing turbos. This comment is not only stated by me, but by MANY knowledgeable SAU members and performance specialist. It is my understanding that ALL RB20, RB25 & RB26 come with ball bearing turbos from factory, therefore a journal bearing unit will be a downgrade to a certain degree of durability.

Guy’s I’m not trying to say that Slide’s or GCG’s turbos aren’t good, in fact I think they are one of the best options out there! However, from seeing the prices on ball bearing highflows, I have organised a Group Buy with a highly credible workshop called Precision Turbochargers who cater for ball bearing as well as journal bearing highflows. Slide’s journal bearing offer is at an unbeatable price therefore I have not tried offering anything in that range. On the other hand Precision Turbo’s are offer a similar product to GCG at a better price and that’s what im trying to offer all SAU members. An alternative to other manufactures with the same quality and service.

Regards,

Sarkis

I think I probably should have explained myself a little better in regards to journal bearings and the RB26DETT.

In the late 80's and early 90's, ball bearing technology hadn't progressed to the point where they were suited to high RPM, high temperature conditions found in turbochargers. Also cost of manufacture was a big issue.

So, as I'm sure you know, the majority of turbocharged vehicles manufactured at this time ran with a sleeve/journal bearing for reliability, friction and cost issues. They did so for years with great results.

But as ball bearing technology progressed, it was found that they actually exerted less friction on the shaft than a sleeve bearing. With less friction they were able to make the turbos more efficient and more responsive than they ever could with journal/sleeve bearings.

As far as I know, and correct me if I'm wrong, R32 GT-R's had a sleeve bearing turbo setup all around, R33 GT-R's had a ball bearing turbo but the R33 N1 remained sleeve bearing and R34 GT-R's had twin ball bearing cores all around.

As a result, I'm not sure what you are referring to here:

also, i just have to add that 99% of 32 and 33 gtr turbo's are journal did nissan downgrade to them for any reason?

Anyway, I was just trying to clear up the fact that in the early variants of the RB26DETT, sleeve bearings were the go due to technology of the time. But as it was further developed ball bearing cores were adopted due to the lower friction they exerted on the shaft.

As for the reliability of each type of bearing, they each have their flaws. Journals are mainly affected by dirty oil problems and are susceptible to axial load issues due to the thrust bearing setup. They are also more sensitive to low oil pressure such as at start and shutdown of the motor (which wouldn't really be an issue if you actually looked after the car). Ball bearings are affected if they are not cooled sufficiently and are pretty much a throw away item if the bearings let go.

I'm going to try and source some dyno sheets from these turbos in particular as well as a couple of GCG and Slide hi flows as well. Might take a little while though.

Edited by Ol_Mate
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...