Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

For a stock gtr34 engine + intercooler + dump pipes.

With Apexi pfc +twin pot filters + 3'' front pipe back + 1.0bar of boost.

What's power figure at awkw or rwkw ?

0-100kph time ?

0-400m time ? street condition (with rear seat and spare wheel)

Thanks !!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/151022-gtr34-power-figure-with-some-mods/
Share on other sites

wow cool !!

but how come your 1/4 time is so quick compares to 0-100 time ??

others said, to run high 11s or flat 12.0s you should make at least around flat 4.0s for 0-100 ??

anyway, that's amazing for such simple mods. Hoped mine could do that too.... cheers

My 34 GTR has pretty much those mods trust intercooler ,power fc, cam gears, exhaust and intake mods stock turbos and engine etc has put out 345 awhp/260awkw or around 280-290rwkw and has run a best of 12.3 @ 112.5 mph but was squatting at the rear on launching off the line so could only do 2 sec 60 ft times really needs some suspension work i think, this was done on a pretty average track here in townsville on a warm night so should be able to get the 60 ft down to 1.7-1.8 and run high 11 sec, my blogg has a dyno sheet and a few photos http://gtr13.blogspot.com

Edited by gtr13

ohh boys.!! :P

i gotta do something about my car cause it really sucks to produce only 220 awkw with those mods !!!

so it didn't go like it should...cheezzz... I should bring it to somewhere else to have a proper tune...any suggestions guys???

Where and who's the real gtr34 tuner (in Melb) ?? .....cheers. :P

ohh boys.!! :happy:

i gotta do something about my car cause it really sucks to produce only 220 awkw with those mods !!!

That will depend on the dyno of the day dude , don't take to much notice of the power it makes, take it to the strip and see what trap speed you gat that will give a better indication of the average power tha car makes in the RPM you are using.

Stock turbos will not give you a lot of power up high but with mods you are listing you could see a high 11 or flat 12 pass.

I have less mods than you in mine but with HKS GTSS turbos + my car is heavier than yours and I still managed 11.8 at 118 mph.

well..., with the current mods and power (220 awkw, winter 15C)...mine did [email protected] on 20C day...SUCKS.. :O ... cause i've got twin plate as well...so no excuse at all..!!

I asked around, people told me to get it re-tune cause it should produce around 240-250 awkw and an easy flat 12s like you guys did !!....

It seemed showing me that i'd waisted money and trust on the previous tuner.. :D ..and it's about time to place another bet to win some decent records.. :cool:...hopefully........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...