Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmm , so looks like R32GTST's get the 15/16 bore master cylinder .

Some more possibilities , these Nissans have 25.4mm (1") master cylinders .

Maxima 5/90 on 3L , Pathfinder D21 VG30E 4x4 10/92 - 11/95 , Pathfinder R50 V6 4x4 11/95-00 .

Patrol Y60 (GQ series) had both the 1" and 1 1/16 BMC .

Going to have to look through wreckers or pester some poor parts person .

Cheers A .

I had a dig through Pick and Pay Less today and mainly found out what doesn't have what I need . Just about all the larger heavier cars like 280ZX's , Z31 300Z , 300C's use some form of BM44 15/16 bore master cylinders .

The only useful thing I did find was a D21 Navara (5/87) with a Nabco BM50 1" cylinder , perfect except it had no proportioning valve . It also only had 1 front and 1 rear hydraulic line outlet so would need a "T" for the front and some kind of external rear line pressure limiting valve ie like JDM R30's and Bluebirds had .

They had no Y60 (GQ) Patrols or later D50 Pathfinders to look at .

Cheers A .

Maxima 5/90 on 3L , Pathfinder D21 VG30E 4x4 10/92 - 11/95 , Pathfinder R50 V6 4x4 11/95-00 .

Patrol Y60 (GQ series) had both the 1" and 1 1/16 BMC .

Interesting....this means you have a good chance finding something local. PBR make local master cylinders for early D21s. Not sure where the lines come out though?

The kindest thing anyone ever did to an Australian built Nissan was to throw all PBR/Girlock hydraulics as far away as possible . Irks me to say it but local content brake components are rubish compared to JDM bits .

Rally fraternity hate PBR/Girlock cylinders because they are built to a price not to a standard .

Thanks anyway cheers A .

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

discopotato03, I'd like to wade in on this discussion. I'm currently looking for a solution for my S13 Silvia I'm building that now has a set of R33 GT-R Brembo's fitted:

Pics

http://www.sillbeer.com/2007/01/and-now-wh...ew-hotness.html

Now I also saw the article on the US site where they had used a Z32 300ZX Brembo brake upgrade and went for the 1 1/16" non-ABS BMC. Unfortunately like you I've realised they're only in LHD guise (UGH!!!!).

So if anyone can help in identifying if Nissan (ie. Nabco/Tokico) make a 1 1/16" non-ABS BMC for RHD situations from a car with a similar weight distribution as a Skyline/Silvia, please speak up...otherwise a 1" might have to do. Part numbers would be very helpful too.

Cheers

Brendan

Just a thought, but according to most specifications around the web, the R32 GT-R N1 versions had the ABS removed to reduce weight, would that then point towards the possibility of them having a 3 port brake master cylinder in the larger BM57 size?

Anyone?

Edited by VSPEC32
Dayam aye, why is the R33 one smaller? You'd think less travel, more force would be better (except when you lock them up too easily)

Just remember to think about the correct meaning of the words you are using....and never forget these two equations.

Pressure (P) = Force (F) / Area (A) .................... Eqn (1)

Friction = uN (Normal force N) .................... Eqn (2)

A few things impact on the general setup...but we can neglect pedal ratio as we are using all this different gear on the same car (Assumed).

So you put a smaller master cylinder in your car. That means you have less area of piston. So making the denominator smaller does not affect the numerator. So that is using a smaller master cylinder doesnt directly affect the force...it affects the pressure. It increases the pressure in the brake lines.

Now that is related to the caliper and pistons/pads as its the pressure in the brake lines that apply a normal force to the pad onto the rotor.

So there are two types of friction, static and kinetec. Now whilst static friciton is higher then kinetic, we dont want to be locking brakes. As that means we have less grip with the road as a locked tyre is modelled as kinetic friction. (remember thats the lower of friction values...bad if we are tryign to stop a car) So remember a rolling tyres grip level is modelled by static friction, ie no relative slip between the two surfaces.

So not wanting to lock a tyre, we must ensure the pad is moving relative to the rotor. ie Kinetic friction.

Now we only want enough force that brings the pad and rotors to the brink of lock up. If we lock up we lose tyre grip with the road.

So remembering that P = F/A. You havent changed your calipers, so the Area of pitons is the same. Having increase the pressure in the lines means that F=PA. A is constant, so the more pressure we have the more force we have.

So that all said, this all assumes the same pedal effort all the way back at Eqn 1. So you apply a 10kg load onto the brake pedal with a smaller master cylinder you will be closer to locking up the brakes with a smaller master cylinder then you would a larger master cylinder. If you have bigger pistons in your caliper and combine that with a smaller master cylinder then you will again have brakes that lock up too easily.

So if you increase the piston size in your calipers, then its not a bad idea to increase the diameter in your BMC. It helps not to have a hair trigger brake pad ready to lock your rotor as soon as you look at the brake pedal. Looking at Nissan it seems they have done the same thing.

Now take this with a grain of salt, but i have driven an R32 GTSt with Brembos it stopped realy nicely. Loved how it stopped. I have driven an R33 GTSt with Brembos and i jumped on the pedal and instantly locked them all up and crashed into witches hats. Now i dont know what pads and tyres were like, and the R33 was on a slippery skid pan...but its something that is in the back of my mind.

So why did Nissan drop the BMC size on the R33. I dont know. But if ppl can tell me the coeffecient of friciton of the R32 and R33 std pads...i suspect they dropped the BMC size as they reduced the friction in the pad used as the car had bigger rotors and would handle the heat better then an R32. Lower temp pads normally means lower friction coeffecient.

The GTRs which would have had more performance orientated pads woudl have had a higher u level meaning that a pedal offering more modulation / travel would be desirable.

Just a thought, but according to most specifications around the web, the R32 GT-R N1 versions had the ABS removed to reduce weight, would that then point towards the possibility of them having a 3 port brake master cylinder in the larger BM57 size?

Has anyone got any solid information on this?

Has anyone got any solid information on this?

Our Targa car is a genuine R33 N1, it has ABS. I'm pretty sure i've heard duncan taling about the R32 N1 ATTESSA unit, as it's ABS functions are deleted, so R32 N1 (and Nismo) have no ABS.

Better late than never.

Late 1992 R32 GTST Non-ABS Master Cyl.

Excellent pedal feel. Almost too easy to lock all 4 wheels but that comes down to the pad that I run.

Hasn't had a flush for 1yr. :S

Only markings I can see on it are:

BM-44

NAB00

I had a mate with a Late 1992 GTS4 check his he said it says..

Japan Nissan Tokico BM50

post-382-1173415001.jpg

post-382-1173415006.jpg

post-382-1173415011.jpg

post-382-1173415018.jpg

Just had a look at mine

car was originally an 1993 R32 GTS and it has a Tokico BM38.

pedal feel is good with the crappy single piston callipers but i am going to have to upgrade it now that gtr32 calipers and 324mm rotors are going on or I am guessing the pedal would hit the floor before lockup :glare:

OK, still trying to track down information on the brake master cylinder from an R32 GT-R N1 (BNR32 N1) - I did manage to find a Chassis number...would that help anyone in tracking it down?

R32 GT-R V-SPEC N1 > KBNR32RBFS ZN

R32 GT-R V-SPEC II N1 > KBNR32RBFS8 ZN

Cheers

Brendan

Edited by VSPEC32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just wanted to pop in an update on my setup. The CD swap has been great, I love the mazworks housing for the overall simplicity. I ended up sealing my trans tunnel with a thin sheet of aluminum reused some of the holes on the trans tunnel, and laid some window sealing EPS foam around the edges. Works great, really quieted things down and sealed up the car.  As for the power comment. Right now I am also running about 650whp. with the way the bell housing is attached to the face of the transmission I have zero doubts it would be fine, mainly because the input shaft and main shaft bearings are seated into the bell housing adapter. This means the load is NOT on the bolts to maintain the power, rather into he casing of the bell housing; Yes the bolts are doing some work there, but with both shafts locked in zero worries.  End of the day, the Mazworks solution is the easiest and safest. no need to take your trans to a shop to get milled perfectly, it fits with minimal clearancing, and you can use all your existing clutch and flywheel.  Driving wise the CD has been great compared to the big box, I'll probably swap my final drive at some point. The serial 9 shifter is gooooood, my only qualm is how tight it is, it takes a fair bit to get use to, 5th and 6th are a bit eh/hard to find at times, but maybe I need re-adjusting, and I think my clutch master is very tired and needs a rebuild. 
    • If you are keen, have a look at my build thread. Car is for sale for the right money or straight swap for a F80 M3 LCI.
    • Welcome mate.  No point in over thinking it, buying any one of those cars you mentioned is not a smart or logical choice with the availability of many "better" (re price to performance) cars available to you.  The heart wants what the heart wants, buy whatever it leads you too.
    • Hey everyone! Im so grateful to be apart of this community and ill do my best to be apart of this. Firstly, i'm not disclosing my real name due to in real life circumstances surrounding my privacy and public image (sorry lol) Secondly, The only thing personal I am willing to share is that I'm from Sydney and a descendant of one of Sydneys largest mortgage firms. I got gifted my first ever car, a 2022 Porsche Cayenne and I love it to death. Ive been driving it for about 5 or 6 months now and honestly Im so grateful for my parents for gifting me this vehicle. However recently I've been working my ass off to afford my second car (which I need help deciding soooooo community help me out please?). Once decided, im planning to try modify it myself. Recent I've been thinking about getting a Skyline, particularly a 25GT or GT-V, yes I know overrated as hell, but I'm also considering a Chaser which I recently came to love. However my dream is to one day own a 180SX (So hard to find clean versions and im not really into importing).  Lastly before I send this off, I want to apologize if I sound tacky or pretentious. I try not to and want to genuinely learn from everyone and anyone. (Im no expert in this area) Thanks for reading!
    • I've got three stashed away but it's starting to get silly with the prices 
×
×
  • Create New...