Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some good tips here. I'd love a 400D myself but cant afford it quite yet so I have no choice but photoshop hehe

I have the same problem with my cam too where it overexposes shiny white things. To fix it, I'd shoot white cars a bit underexposed and use photoshop's shadow/highlights and levels tools.

If you shoot the car overexposed its really hard to get detail back in photoshop so underexposing is the way

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks to me like the camera is metering the average for the whole frame, as the rest of your shot is perfectly exposed. but the white car is slightly overexposed (washed out, lack of detail).

Not sure on the specs of you camera, but if you could change the way it meters that would be a good way to go (centre weighted, with the car in the centre of frame). Actually, have just read the specs you posted, and it seems it does Ealuative, Centre Weighted and Spot. Try the Centre Weighted, and even a couple of shots with Spot (though this really will meter according to one spot, and ignore the rest of the frame, so could be very hit and miss). Of course you'll have to keep the car in the centre, then just crop differently for different placements.

Other than that, Genghis has a good idea with under exposing, then using Levels in photoshop (or masking off the car in seperate layer and adjusting just the levels of the car so that the background stays correctly exposed). I se from the specs that your camera can do -2 stops in 1/3 increments. Play around with -1/3, -2/3 and -1 stop (1 stop equals half the amount of light getting to the sensor).

Bsically try a few shots with each method, and a few combining them, then see which comes up best. The Exif info stored with the picture should tell you what exposure setting you were on, and maybe even what metering method. The software that came with the camera should be able to show that info.

Looks to me like the camera is metering the average for the whole frame, as the rest of your shot is perfectly exposed. but the white car is slightly overexposed (washed out, lack of detail).

Not sure on the specs of you camera, but if you could change the way it meters that would be a good way to go (centre weighted, with the car in the centre of frame). Actually, have just read the specs you posted, and it seems it does Ealuative, Centre Weighted and Spot. Try the Centre Weighted, and even a couple of shots with Spot (though this really will meter according to one spot, and ignore the rest of the frame, so could be very hit and miss). Of course you'll have to keep the car in the centre, then just crop differently for different placements.

Other than that, Genghis has a good idea with under exposing, then using Levels in photoshop (or masking off the car in seperate layer and adjusting just the levels of the car so that the background stays correctly exposed). I se from the specs that your camera can do -2 stops in 1/3 increments. Play around with -1/3, -2/3 and -1 stop (1 stop equals half the amount of light getting to the sensor).

Bsically try a few shots with each method, and a few combining them, then see which comes up best. The Exif info stored with the picture should tell you what exposure setting you were on, and maybe even what metering method. The software that came with the camera should be able to show that info.

Thanks for the info. The inherent problem is that you basically need to have the camera set up before the car hoves into view. So I guess if I use the ISO settings available & then go from there. Will play around with the exposure also.

I'm not sure how much of a difference the ISO setting will make, that may just adjust the shutter speed required for a given aperture (the sensitivity, also how much noise you end up with). The camera will still try to meter (expose) for the whole scene, that's why I reckon try centre weighted metering, that way it may help with white cars, and also with black as it will be concentrating on the car. If try to underexpose all the time, dark cars won't come out so well, so I guess you'll just have to find a good mid point that works well enough most of the time (unless it's really quick to change stuff).

Anyway, good luck, and if you find a set up that works post it up here and we can all learn what works in case we come across a similar problem.

  • 2 weeks later...

Seeing as how the 400D is the camera of choice, does anyone know where to get one on special or know of a good place to buy them?

Have used www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au before and found them good, they list 400D for $1,178.00, any better prices or deals out there? No point paying more than I have too.

Haven't used before but

http://www.camerasdirect.com.au list the 400D for $1099. Might pop in and check out the store as it is in Brisbane and pick up is fine.

Oh, reason I am looking at just the camera body and not the whole lens kit as well is I have normal/old Canon Eos camera already and the lenses will work fine (apparently)?

Edited by wannabeslida

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Chrome surrounds back on and polished up, no idea why some knob would prime a single piece 🙄
    • Well, in the same way that you can't tell any SUV from any manufacturer in any size category from any other one, "sports" coupes now all look identical. Stand back and squint your eyes and the Supra and the 400Z and the GR/BRZ things all look the same. I was just thinking last night, when sitting behind a Subaru CrossTrek, that I have no idea what it is, how it differs from an XV, or a Forester, or an Outback, or anything else Subaru offer, and I couldn't tell if it was supposed to be small, medium or large. I contrasted that to the good old days, where a HQ Kingswood had familial similarities to an LJ Torana, but there is no way that you could confuse them, and how a bit later, the HX Kinger and the concurrent Torana and the Gemini all had familial similarities, but you still could not confuse them. Ditto the ugly Fords and Chryslers of the era. But now, a RAV4 looks like a Kluger, looks like a Yaris/Cross/whatever they're calling those stupid f**king things, looks like every other Toyota that's not a Camry/Corolla sedan.
    • The Prelude doesn't look that bad without all that lens distortion in those pics. Makes it look disproportionate when it isn't. Actually I kind of liked it at the Osaka Auto Messe earlier this year. 
    • Pour in the highest octane, non-ethanol fuel you can get and see if the readout changes. If it's dead bang on 11% then I would question the sensor. Another quick test, just take it out and run normal (in an american accent) gas-o-line through it and see if the sampled ethanol or lack of changes.   United E85 here in the land of drop bears does vary a bit, I've had as high as E87 (could be water in their tanks too, who knows)
×
×
  • Create New...