Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've recently installed a pnuematic boost controller to my lightly modded stock turbo R32 GTS-t.

Problem is that the boost pressure doesn't hold all the way but starts to drop at the top end.

I haven't done any testing yet but I think it's either the wastegate spring is too soft and is allowing the wastegate to be pushed open or the BOV is leaking.

Opinions please.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15207-boost-droping-off/
Share on other sites

Have you had your car dyno'ed? Because that will give you the best idea of whats happening. How much is it dropping off?

To give you an idea of what its normal turbo behaviour. My standard RB20DET turbo will peak at 11.5 pound at 4200 rpm. After that it drops off slowly to a low of 9.23 at 6250rpm.

The stock turbo is not efficent enough to produce the same amount of boost through out the rev range. It "runs out of puff" as it were.

A turbo will not hold the same amount of boost to an infinite RPM. If that were the case we'd all be shopping for the smallest turbo we could find so we could shove 18 pound through it with no lag. Of course thats not the case.

Turbocharger efficency and how it works is a tricky subject, and something im nowhere near qualified to speak specifically about. But im sure theres others on here that know all about impeller air flow, fin design, housings etc..

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15207-boost-droping-off/#findComment-309878
Share on other sites

When I have a working scanner I'll scan my dyno sheet. At 4800rpm my boost drops off from 12.5psi to 10psi immediately, within probably 50-100revs and then slowly tapers off from 10psi to about 9.5psi by 6630rpm at which peak power is reached. Its quite odd and has something to do with the NVCS, hopefully once I remove the ECU and fit something else up it'll get rid of the problem.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/15207-boost-droping-off/#findComment-309929
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
    • Such a shame places like Amaroo Park have been redeveloped, smaller tracks always make for good racing. Cheers for sharing @PranK there's some good Lakeside video's too. Its so hard with older the cars as parts are so rare and everything was made for a particular chassis at that point in time. Even the V8 Supercar Blueprint era cars are all different between each chassis within a team as they learnt things and made improvements. The COTF cars between each Chassis builder is different too especially motor/oil systems/intakes. The Group A stuff is worth so much too especially chassis with good history. The only way to do it would be composite panels and similar engine drivelines to the original cars. Ford sierra running Focus RS driveline, Commodore running a short stroke LS/LT or a Falcon with coyote and a H Pattern dog box. Could use a standard ecu across all models with a Torque Map and DBW for parity which is not even used in Supercars currently. Hell a TCM is almost a full chassis car these days and the suspension is not even close to standard style in the front running cars.  
×
×
  • Create New...