Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For most 'normal' people, a three inch does all that it is supposed to (less restriction). Anything bigger is for show or really, really high horse power applications (you do actually need some backpressure to run smoothly/properly for anything remotely like daily driving).

Forced induction cars don't need backpressure anywhere near as much as NA cars. Because the turbo forces more than 1 atmosphere of pressure into the cylinder, it's pretty well "sucked" out by the lower pressure atmosphere behind it.

It's also the main reason why extractors are more suited to NA cars. Not really because NA cars have more to gain from the extractors, but because turbo cars have less to lose from an inefficient exhaust manifold design.

I think 4" dump would be too big for a normal street-driven GTS-t and sap a little performance, but I think the same pipe would absolutely kill the performance of any normal NA car.

You cant have too little back pressure. Think about this, people spend alot of time and money getting the air in and OUT of the head as easily and quickly as possible - head porting, heat wrapping, etc - all designed to get the air out quicker. Back pressure will not help this, it will fight it, it will retain heat in the cylinders. What possible good does it do in the pursuit of hp????

The cat is a BIG restriction to the flow of the exhaust. If you ever get the chance have a look inside one - its scary.

I read a post by Sydneykid where he flow tested a 3" (or was it 2.5" - Sydneykid) pipe, and found no restriction to air flow up to around 600hp air flow (help again Sydneykid!) or more.

Another thing to consider is what mufflers/resonators are fitted to the exhaust. I originally fitted an N1 style exhaust - very loud but made boost very quickly and gave a good power increase.

I then changed to a Nismo exhaust with 1 muffler and 1 resonator and I noticed the car slowed down, and made boost later. Both systems were 3". Sorry I can't back this up with dyno figures.

My personal advice would be to get the biggest diameter, least restrictive exhaust that you can - it cant hurt! Then fit the highest flow cat you can find;) you'll love it.

The design of the exhaust is as tricky as you make it.

The most forgotten dimension by exhaust upgraders is the 'thermal' one (and it relates directly to exhaust gas speed). At the start of the turbo exit the gases have incredible heat (and therefore speed and pressure) ,as the gasses travel back the speed of the gas reduces as its energy is lost to the pipe and radiated as heat.

Here is where it gets hard. The cooler gases are best not put through overly large pipes as it can increase turbulence but, smaller pipes have a larger surface area to volume ratio to lose heat through!

In practice I have found that the largest diameter should be at the start of the turbine outlet, any larger and you create unnecessary turbulence. Factory turbo --- 3inch from memory. Think 'match porting' at this stage.

Next the cat needs to be as close to the turbo as is practical, better still lets forget you have one (they kill power).

The first 3inch muffler needs to be nice and close to the dump pipe and filled with stainless packing (fibreglass will usually die and turn the muffler into a marracca) Exhaust places directing you to fibreglass mufflers will never place a muffler very close to the dump for this reason.

The second muffler before the diff @ 2 1/2 inch and 2 1/4 over the diff into a slight megaphone shaped tail pipe that tappers gradually out to 4inches.

Wrap the dump pipe to the first muffler or cat (which has been ceramic coated) in heat tape. If you have the money coat or wrap the entire exhaust.

If you tell people to reduce exhaust pipe diameter as you go back on a street car exhaust , they look at you funny and think your a loon.No it's not about backpressure, it's about retaining a low pressure 'trail' all the way back to the tail pipe. Hi I'm certified ! :P

I forgot to mention that the design is one that goes from 'hot' to 'cold' front to back and as that relates to high pressure to low pressure your home and hosed.

Then again if you can trap all the heat in then a uniform diameter of 3 inches all the way is the shot.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
    • I’d go the smaller rear just because you’re staying on 98, if e85 I’d go the bigger one
×
×
  • Create New...